Four-year talent direction
Track class strength, position balance and roster needs across signing cycles.

Complete schedules, team production, player statistics, news, analytics, recruiting and program history in one fan destination.
Record: 5–7 (Schedule & Results)
Conference: Big Ten
Players: 59
Points For: 344
Points/Game: 28.7
Points Against: 382
Opp. Points/Game: 31.8
Season totals organized for quick comparison. Swipe horizontally for more.
| PASS CMP | PASS ATT | PASS YDS | PASS % | PASS AVG | PASS TD | PASS INT | PASS RTG | SACK | RUSH ATT | RUSH YDS | RUSH AVG | RUSH TD | REC | REC YDS | REC AVG | REC TD | PTS/G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 234 | 378 | 3,193 | 61.9 | 8.4 | 22 | 7 | 148.4 | 0 | 460 | 1,728 | 3.8 | 19 | 234 | 3,193 | 13.6 | 22 | 28.7 |
The verified team snapshot is loading now.
| PLAYER | CMP | ATT | YDS | CMP% | AVG | TD | INT | RTG | SACK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. KaliakmanisQB | 229 | 368 | 3124 | 62.2 | 8.5 | 20 | 7 | 147.7 | — |
| A. SuraceQB | 4 | 9 | 58 | 44.4 | 6.4 | 2 | 0 | 171.9 | — |
| S. AshenfelderQB | 1 | 1 | 11 | 100.0 | 11.0 | 0 | 0 | 192.4 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 234 | 378 | 3,193 | 61.9 | 8.4 | 22 | 7 | 148.4 | 0 |
| PLAYER | CAR | YDS | AVG | LNG | TD | FUM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. RaymondRB | 244 | 1241 | 5.1 | 51 | 13 | — |
| J. BenjaminRB | 68 | 328 | 4.8 | 19 | 2 | — |
| C. Campbell Jr.RB | 22 | 119 | 5.4 | 22 | 0 | — |
| S. Brown VRB | 16 | 38 | 2.4 | 9 | 0 | — |
| E. GuerrierRB | 7 | 25 | 3.6 | 9 | 0 | — |
| T. MitchellRB | 3 | 14 | 4.7 | 7 | 0 | — |
| J. PatelPK | 1 | -3 | -3.0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| S. AshenfelderQB | 1 | -3 | -3.0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| A. SuraceQB | 2 | -5 | -2.5 | 0 | 0 | — |
| A. KaliakmanisQB | 96 | -26 | -0.3 | 15 | 4 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 460 | 1,728 | 3.8 | 51 | 19 | 0 |
| PLAYER | REC | YDS | AVG | LNG | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K. DuffWR | 60 | 1084 | 18.1 | 72 | 7 |
| I. StrongWR | 52 | 762 | 14.7 | 45 | 5 |
| D. SheffieldWR | 44 | 577 | 13.1 | 54 | 5 |
| K. Fletcher Jr.TE | 26 | 236 | 9.1 | 39 | 0 |
| A. RaymondRB | 18 | 225 | 12.5 | 48 | 2 |
| B. Black IIIWR | 8 | 119 | 14.9 | 37 | 1 |
| C. WeberTE | 17 | 102 | 6.0 | 12 | 0 |
| M. Thomas IIIWR | 1 | 25 | 25.0 | 25 | 1 |
| J. BenjaminRB | 4 | 19 | 4.8 | 6 | 0 |
| V. Allen IIIWR | 1 | 18 | 18.0 | 18 | 0 |
| J. GisterTE | 1 | 11 | 11.0 | 11 | 0 |
| D. KaliakmanisWR | 1 | 9 | 9.0 | 9 | 1 |
| L. BlakeTE | 1 | 6 | 6.0 | 6 | 0 |
| TEAM TOTALS | 234 | 3,193 | 13.6 | 72 | 22 |
| PLAYER | TOT | SOLO | AST | TFL | SACK | INT | PD | FF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J. EladDB | 77 | 51 | — | 3.0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | — |
| D. DjabomeLB | 67 | 33 | — | 5.5 | 2 | — | 0 | — |
| K. SandersDB | 64 | 39 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| A. WrightLB | 53 | 26 | — | 0.5 | 0 | — | 2 | — |
| B. MascoeDB | 48 | 29 | — | 2.0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | — |
| C. MillerDB | 43 | 34 | — | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 | — |
| J. HendersonCB | 39 | 29 | — | 3 | 0 | — | 3 | — |
| E. O'NeillDL | 37 | 16 | — | 10.0 | 2.5 | — | 1 | — |
| B. WeaverDL | 28 | 9 | — | 7.0 | 2.5 | — | 1 | — |
| J. ThompsonDL | 25 | 13 | — | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | — |
| J. WalkerDE | 25 | 12 | — | 2.5 | 1 | — | 0 | — |
| M. WalkerLB | 17 | 7 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| Z. AngoyDL | 14 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| K. GriffinDL | 12 | 8 | — | 1.5 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| S. RobinsonLB | 12 | 5 | — | 0.5 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| A. SalaamDB | 9 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| D. DeNgoheDL | 8 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| F. GnagoDL | 7 | 3 | — | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — |
| C. JoinesDB | 6 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| D. McClaryLB | 6 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| O. BillotteDL | 6 | 1 | — | 0.5 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| D. Abdou RahmanDL | 5 | 5 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | — |
| J. OfurieDB | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| K. LevyDB | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| T. WardDB | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| D. AllenDL | 4 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| S. JusmaDB | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| D. KaliakmanisWR | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| K. ArchieLB | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| M. RobinsonDB | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| S. ClawgesDB | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| Z. WilliamsDB | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| B. Black IIIWR | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| C. WeberTE | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| H. Hughes Jr.DL | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| I. StrongWR | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| I. CrumplerDB | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. InsingaLB | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| T. WhiteOL | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| D. BraithwaiteWR | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 651 | 365 | 0 | 47 | 11 | 5 | 23 | 0 |
| PLAYER | FGM | FGA | FG% | XPM | XPA | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J. PatelPK | 13 | 18 | — | 37 | 39 | 76 |
| D. PizzaroPK | 0 | 1 | — | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| TEAM TOTALS | 13 | 19 | 68.4 | 39 | 41 | 78 |
Saddled with mounting debt, poor on-field results and diminishing television value, the Scarlet Knights are turning into an expensive liability for their conference Rutgers wants to be in the Big Ten, it just doesn't want to act like a Big Ten school. The Knights are also only 3-12 in Big Ten play over the last two seasons. Even when you consider what Greg Schiano has meant to the program -- his 101 wins are 23 more than any other coach in program history, and he's been the coach for nine of the school's 13 bowl games -- those are the kind of results that tend to lead to changes. Yet, in the announcement that Schiano would be returning, Rutgers athletics director Keli Zinn made it clear that this decision had nothing to do with accepting the results. "Our results are not acceptable for the expectations we have for our football program and for the athletics program we are building," Zinn said. "However, I also have an obligation to make decisions that serve the best long-term interests of Rutgers University. "Let me be very clear: this decision is not reflective of a lowering of standards or an indication that everything is fine.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATESchiano met with AD Keli Zinn to lay out a plan for improvement going into next fall after the Scarlet Knights stumbled out of the gate this year. The other obstacle to moving on from Schiano was his buyout figure had he been fired after the 2026 season. $39.99 gets you a FULL year of On3 | Rivals national coverage “Our 2026 football season has fallen well below our expectations and has understandably led to frustration from our passionate fans and supporters,” Zinn said in a statement. “As your Director of Athletics and as a competitor at heart, I feel those same emotions. Our results are not acceptable for the expectations we have for our football program and for the athletics program we are building. “However, I also have an obligation to make decisions that serve the best long-term interests of Rutgers University. There are several factors that go into decisions regarding the hiring and retention of head coaches in all of our sports, especially football and basketball.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEWisconsin to stick with Hopkins at QB vs. Maryland. Wisconsin will stick with freshman Ryan Hopkins as its starting quarterback this week at Maryland, following his impressive debut in Saturday's win over Rutgers.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATERutgers football's loss to Wisconsin another low point in lost season. Rutgers football fell to 2-7 with its loss to Wisconsin, meaning the Scarlet Knights officially will not be bowl eligible in lost season.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATERutgers vs. Wisconsin Prediction, Odds, Picks For College Football Week 10. Get the latest Rutgers vs. Wisconsin odds, prediction and pick for College Football Week 10, plus kickoff time, TV channel and streaming information.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATERutgers football loses top offensive lineman for remainder of season. Rutgers football suffered another tough injury as offensive lineman Kobe Asamoah will miss the rest of the 2026 season.
READ UPDATE →STATTAKEThe Trojans are 4–0. They also beat an 0–3 Rutgers team by seven while losing the second half by 80 yards. Both facts have to matter.
READ UPDATE →Track class strength, position balance and roster needs across signing cycles.
See how efficiently signed talent develops into starts, impact and wins.
Separate returning development from incoming and outgoing portal value.
Wins, efficiency and schedule strength in one timeline.
Home, road, favorite and underdog performance.
Recent form versus the long-term series story.
Drafted players by position and development path.