North Texas
Western Kentucky
Northwestern
Rutgers
Nebraska
Ohio State
Michigan
Minnesota
USC
Washington
PurdueFour-year talent direction
Track class strength, position balance and roster needs across signing cycles.
STATTAKE DATABASEFIND ANY TEAM OR PLAYER
Big Ten • FBS TEAM DATABASE
Indiana
Complete schedules, team production, player statistics, news, analytics, recruiting and program history in one fan destination.
2026 SEASON DATABASE
Indiana football
Record: 2–0 (Schedule & Results)
Conference: Big Ten
Players: 43
Points For: 107
Points/Game: 53.5
Points Against: 16
Opp. Points/Game: 8.0
2026 SEASON
LIVE SCOREBOARD →Schedule & results
OFFICIAL SCHEDULE FEEDOpponent names and logos open team pages. Dates and results open StatTake box scores.
WEEKOPPONENTLOCATIONGAME
WEEK 10BYE——
TEAM PRODUCTION
Team stats
Season totals organized for quick comparison. Swipe horizontally for more.
2026 SEASON TOTALS
ALL GAMESOffense at a glance
| PASS CMP | PASS ATT | PASS YDS | PASS % | PASS AVG | PASS TD | PASS INT | PASS RTG | SACK | RUSH ATT | RUSH YDS | RUSH AVG | RUSH TD | REC | REC YDS | REC AVG | REC TD | PTS/G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22 | 32 | 440 | 68.8 | 13.8 | 10 | 0 | 287.4 | 0 | 76 | 430 | 5.7 | 4 | 22 | 440 | 20.0 | 10 | 53.5 |
TEAM ANALYTICS CENTER
OPEN NATIONAL ANALYTICS →Indiana analytics
LOADING 2026 EPA METRICS
The verified team snapshot is loading now.
2026 COMPLETE TEAM ROSTER
PLAYER PROFILES →Individual player statistics
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Passing
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Rushing
| PLAYER | CAR | YDS | AVG | LNG | TD | FUM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T. RichardRB | 26 | 166 | 6.4 | 23 | 3 | — |
| L. Beebe Jr.RB | 30 | 145 | 4.8 | 21 | 0 | — |
| G. WilsonQB | 3 | 49 | 16.3 | 43 | 1 | — |
| J. CampbellRB | 5 | 36 | 7.2 | 23 | 0 | — |
| J. HooverQB | 6 | 18 | 3.0 | 11 | 0 | — |
| S. CuonoRB | 6 | 16 | 2.7 | 8 | 0 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 76 | 430 | 5.7 | 43 | 4 | 0 |
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Receiving
| PLAYER | REC | YDS | AVG | LNG | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. BeckerWR | 7 | 145 | 20.7 | 41 | 5 |
| N. MarshWR | 4 | 88 | 22.0 | 51 | 2 |
| S. PrestonWR | 2 | 49 | 24.5 | 39 | 1 |
| D. ChandlerWR | 2 | 45 | 22.5 | 42 | 2 |
| T. RichardRB | 2 | 43 | 21.5 | 38 | 0 |
| T. MorrisWR | 3 | 35 | 11.7 | 22 | 0 |
| B. SchottTE | 1 | 25 | 25.0 | 25 | 0 |
| J. WasserstromWR | 1 | 10 | 10.0 | 10 | 0 |
| TEAM TOTALS | 22 | 440 | 20.0 | 51 | 10 |
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Defense
| PLAYER | TOT | SOLO | AST | TFL | SACK | INT | PD | FF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I. JonesLB | 17 | 10 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| R. HardyLB | 12 | 6 | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — |
| B. Baldwin Jr.DB | 10 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| R. GandyDB | 8 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| A. FerrellDB | 6 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. SavageLB | 6 | 4 | — | 1.5 | 1 | — | 0 | — |
| J. UtzingerLB | 6 | 4 | — | 0.5 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| Q. SanksDB | 6 | 4 | — | 0.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — |
| S. DaleyDL | 6 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| T. OsunsanmiDL | 6 | 3 | — | 3.5 | 1 | — | 0 | — |
| J. HjelleDL | 5 | 2 | — | 1.5 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| P. ZachmanDB | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| A. ChungDB | 4 | 0 | — | 0.5 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| D. NdukweDL | 4 | 3 | — | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. BellDB | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. BurnhamDL | 4 | 1 | — | 0.5 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| C. ObiazorDL | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| K. TurnerLB | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| K. CalhounDL | 2 | 2 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — |
| L. MurffDB | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| M. LandinoDL | 2 | 1 | — | 1.5 | 1 | — | 0 | — |
| T. TuckerDL | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — |
| C. McHaneyDL | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| C. WilliamsDB | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| H. OhlingerLB | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. SharpeDB | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 126 | 66 | 0 | 19 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Kicking & Scoring
| PLAYER | FGM | FGA | FG% | XPM | XPA | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N. RadicicPK | 1 | 1 | — | 7 | 7 | 10 |
| P. McAteerPK | 0 | 0 | — | 7 | 8 | 7 |
| TEAM TOTALS | 1 | 1 | 100.0 | 14 | 15 | 17 |
TEAM NEWS + STATTAKE ARTICLES
ALL CFB NEWS →Latest Indiana coverage
STATTAKE
Is Indiana Already Better Than Last Year’s National Champion?
The opponents have not been strong enough to settle the argument. The Hoosiers’ balance, quarterback efficiency and defensive control are strong enough to make it a real one.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEIndiana football gets major NCAA eligibility ruling for two key defenders.
Indiana football gets major NCAA eligibility ruling for two key defenders. Stephen Daley and Kellan Wyatt are eligible again after a favorable court ruling in Indiana's ongoing NCAA case.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATE2026 Big Ten Title Odds: Ohio State leads Polymarket odds after Week 3 of season.
A new Polymarket prediction market lists nine Big Ten football teams with 3% or greater odds to win the Big Ten Championship this season. Ryan Day ‘s Ohio State Buckeyes , which haven’t won a Big Ten title since 2020, are currently trending as an early season favorite with 36% odds as of 11:30 pm ET on Sept. 23 . They sit just ahead of Indiana (25%) and Oregon (12%). Penn State and USC also currently sit at or above 6% odds. Key points from the original article: • Ohio State Buckeyes – 36% • Indiana Hoosiers – 25% • Oregon Ducks – 12% • T4. Penn State Nittany Lions – 6% • T4. USC Trojans – 6% • T6. Michigan Wolverines – 4% • T6. UCLA Bruins – 4% • T8. Iowa Hawkeyes – 3% • T8. Northwestern Wildcats – 3% • Teams 10-18
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEBig Ten Football Power Poll: Week Three.
Big Ten Football Power Poll: Week Three. A week as expected in Week 3 leads to one that should answer many questions in Week 4 Week three pretty much went as expected. The Big Ten was favorited big in a majority of the non-conference games, and they won those games. Key points from the original article: 1. Indiana Hoosiers 3-0 (1) 2. Ohio State Buckeyes 2-1 (3) 3. USC Trojans 4-0 (2) 4. Penn State Nittany Lions 3-0 (4) 5. Michigan Wolverines (3-0) (5) 6. Oregon Ducks 2-1 (8) 7. Iowa Hawkeyes 3-0 (7) 8. Washington Huskies 3-0 (6) 9. Nebraska Cornhuskers 3-0 (9) 10. UCLA Bruins 3-0 (10) 11. Minnesota Golden Gophers 2-1 (11) 12. Northwestern Wildcats 2-0 (13) 13. Illinois Fighting Illini 2-1 (12) 14. Wisconsin Badgers 2-1 (14) 15. Michigan State Spartans 2-1 (15) 16. Maryland Terrapins 2-1 (16) 17. Purdue Boilermakers 1-2 (17) 18. Rutgers Scarlet Knights 0-3 (18)
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATE5 key takeaways from Big Ten football after Week 3.
5 key takeaways from Big Ten football after Week 3. After Week 3 the Big Ten does not have a clear consensus on who will win the conference, just many potential contenders in a cluttered race Each week continues to be filled with new and intriguing storylines in the Big Ten. The Big Ten is as deep and competitive as it's ever been. Key points from the original article: 1. Oregon's offense is still elite 2. Penn State will be a problem this season 3. The Big Ten is deeper than just top two teams 4. Indiana should be ranked higher 5. UCLA is a huge dark horse in this conference
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEEverything Indiana football’s Curt Cignetti said ahead of Northwestern.
Everything Indiana football’s Curt Cignetti said ahead of Northwestern. Curt Cignetti was asked about Aidan Chiles, Chip Kelly, Josh Hoover and more during his usual Monday press conference.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEIndiana: Football Week 5: SD and ND both win Homecoming games.
Football Week 5: SD and ND both win Homecoming games. South Decatur and North Decatur celebrated Homecoming in Week 5 and both teams posted big wins in front of the home crowd. The Cougars hosted Brown County and posted a 49-0 shut out win against the Eagles. South improved to 3-2 on the season and 2-1 in the Mid-Indiana Football Conference.
READ UPDATE →FEATURED ANALYSISSeven Teams Have 11-1 Title Odds. Only Three Were Top-12 on Both Sides.
The betting market sees a seven-team championship tier. StatTake’s 2025 efficiency data draws a sharper line around Ohio State, Oregon and Indiana—and exposes the different bets being made on Texas, Notre Dame, Georgia and Miami.
READ UPDATE →ROSTER BUILDING
RECRUITING HUB →Recruiting & development
Recruiting to production
See how efficiently signed talent develops into starts, impact and wins.
What transfers added
Separate returning development from incoming and outgoing portal value.
PROGRAM CONTEXT
TEAM TRENDS →History & trends
Wins, efficiency and schedule strength in one timeline.
Home, road, favorite and underdog performance.
Recent form versus the long-term series story.
Drafted players by position and development path.
Illinois
Iowa
Maryland
Michigan State