Oklahoma State
Northwestern
Oregon State
Penn State
Indiana
Rutgers
Wisconsin
Iowa
Minnesota
USC
Washington
James Madison
Texas TechFour-year talent direction
Track class strength, position balance and roster needs across signing cycles.
STATTAKE DATABASEFIND ANY TEAM OR PLAYER
Big Ten • FBS TEAM DATABASE
Oregon
Complete schedules, team production, player statistics, news, analytics, recruiting and program history in one fan destination.
2025 SEASON DATABASE
Oregon football
Record: 13–2 (Schedule & Results)
Conference: Big Ten
Players: 64
Points For: 554
Points/Game: 36.9
Points Against: 268
Opp. Points/Game: 17.9
2025 SEASON
LIVE SCOREBOARD →Schedule & results
OFFICIAL SCHEDULE FEEDOpponent names and logos open team pages. Dates and results open StatTake box scores.
WEEKOPPONENTLOCATIONGAME
WEEK 5BYE——
WEEK 9BYE——
POSTSEASONBOWL & PLAYOFF GAMES
TEAM PRODUCTION
Team stats
Season totals organized for quick comparison. Swipe horizontally for more.
2025 SEASON TOTALS
ALL GAMESOffense at a glance
| PASS CMP | PASS ATT | PASS YDS | PASS % | PASS AVG | PASS TD | PASS INT | PASS RTG | SACK | RUSH ATT | RUSH YDS | RUSH AVG | RUSH TD | REC | REC YDS | REC AVG | REC TD | PTS/G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 313 | 436 | 3,804 | 71.8 | 8.7 | 31 | 10 | 164.0 | 0 | 534 | 3,016 | 5.6 | 35 | 313 | 3,804 | 12.2 | 31 | 36.9 |
TEAM ANALYTICS CENTER
OPEN NATIONAL ANALYTICS →Oregon analytics
LOADING 2025 EPA METRICS
The verified team snapshot is loading now.
2025 COMPLETE TEAM ROSTER
PLAYER PROFILES →Individual player statistics
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Passing
| PLAYER | CMP | ATT | YDS | CMP% | AVG | TD | INT | RTG | SACK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D. MooreQB | 296 | 412 | 3565 | 71.8 | 8.7 | 30 | 10 | 163.7 | — |
| B. ThomasQB | 12 | 16 | 130 | 75.0 | 8.1 | 1 | 0 | 163.9 | — |
| L. MogaQB | 3 | 5 | 58 | 60.0 | 11.6 | 0 | 0 | 157.4 | — |
| A. NovosadQB | 1 | 2 | 40 | 50.0 | 20.0 | 0 | 0 | 218.0 | — |
| J. Ferguson-ReynoldsP | 1 | 1 | 11 | 100.0 | 11.0 | 0 | 0 | 192.4 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 313 | 436 | 3,804 | 71.8 | 8.7 | 31 | 10 | 164.0 | 0 |
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Rushing
| PLAYER | CAR | YDS | AVG | LNG | TD | FUM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N. WhittingtonRB | 129 | 829 | 6.4 | 68 | 6 | — |
| J. DavisonRB | 112 | 667 | 6.0 | 67 | 15 | — |
| D. Hill Jr.RB | 75 | 656 | 8.7 | 71 | 5 | — |
| J. LimarRB | 46 | 262 | 5.7 | 53 | 3 | — |
| D. MooreQB | 73 | 156 | 2.1 | 49 | 2 | — |
| J. HarrisRB | 42 | 151 | 3.6 | 16 | 2 | — |
| D. RiggsRB | 17 | 86 | 5.1 | 19 | 0 | — |
| M. HughesRB | 17 | 70 | 4.1 | 19 | 0 | — |
| D. MooreWR | 4 | 49 | 12.3 | 25 | 1 | — |
| L. MogaQB | 3 | 49 | 16.3 | 25 | 0 | — |
| J. Ferguson-ReynoldsP | 1 | 21 | 21.0 | 21 | 0 | — |
| B. ThomasQB | 9 | 17 | 1.9 | 15 | 0 | — |
| K. SadiqTE | 3 | 6 | 2.0 | 3 | 0 | — |
| B. BoettcherLB | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | — |
| R. Saleapaga IITE | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| M. BensonWR | 1 | -4 | -4.0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 534 | 3,016 | 5.6 | 71 | 35 | 0 |
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Receiving
| PLAYER | REC | YDS | AVG | LNG | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M. BensonWR | 43 | 719 | 16.7 | 64 | 6 |
| K. SadiqTE | 51 | 560 | 11.0 | 30 | 8 |
| J. McClellanWR | 38 | 557 | 14.7 | 51 | 3 |
| J. JohnsonTE | 32 | 510 | 15.9 | 56 | 3 |
| D. MooreWR | 34 | 497 | 14.6 | 65 | 3 |
| G. Bryant Jr.WR | 26 | 306 | 11.8 | 49 | 4 |
| D. Hill Jr.RB | 16 | 137 | 8.6 | 40 | 1 |
| N. WhittingtonRB | 19 | 98 | 5.2 | 12 | 1 |
| J. HarrisRB | 6 | 89 | 14.8 | 50 | 0 |
| J. LimarRB | 11 | 75 | 6.8 | 27 | 0 |
| J. DavisonRB | 12 | 62 | 5.2 | 14 | 0 |
| J. LoweWR | 6 | 56 | 9.3 | 14 | 0 |
| K. KasperWR | 2 | 51 | 25.5 | 40 | 0 |
| R. Saleapaga IITE | 3 | 26 | 8.7 | 18 | 1 |
| C. PerryWR | 10 | 25 | 2.5 | 8 | 0 |
| M. HughesRB | 2 | 24 | 12.0 | 20 | 0 |
| T. TuiotiLB | 1 | 11 | 11.0 | 11 | 0 |
| G. WilsonOL | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 |
| TEAM TOTALS | 313 | 3,804 | 12.2 | 65 | 31 |
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Defense
| PLAYER | TOT | SOLO | AST | TFL | SACK | INT | PD | FF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B. BoettcherLB | 132 | 55 | — | 5.5 | 1 | 1 | 5 | — |
| D. ThienemanDB | 92 | 44 | — | 3.5 | 1 | 2 | 5 | — |
| A. FlowersDB | 69 | 37 | — | 1.0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | — |
| T. TuiotiLB | 68 | 33 | — | 16.0 | 9.5 | — | 5 | — |
| J. MixonLB | 57 | 28 | — | 4.0 | 0.5 | 2 | 7 | — |
| B. AlexanderDL | 50 | 19 | — | 6.5 | 1.0 | — | 1 | — |
| B. Finney Jr.DB | 42 | 29 | — | 3.0 | 1 | 3 | 7 | — |
| D. JacksonLB | 41 | 16 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. CanadyDB | 39 | 19 | — | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 | — |
| M. UiagaleleiLB | 34 | 19 | — | 9.5 | 6 | — | 3 | — |
| A. WashingtonDL | 33 | 15 | — | 4.5 | 1.5 | — | 7 | — |
| B. PurchaseDE | 32 | 13 | — | 4.5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | — |
| I. ObidegwuDB | 25 | 13 | — | 0.5 | 0 | 1 | 6 | — |
| P. WoodyardDB | 22 | 9 | — | 0.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — |
| A. PorterDL | 20 | 6 | — | 2.5 | 1 | — | 1 | — |
| T. JohnsonDB | 19 | 15 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 3 | — |
| T. GrayDL | 18 | 5 | — | 2.0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| N. OffordDB | 15 | 8 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| T. GreenDL | 15 | 8 | — | 1.0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| K. LopaDB | 12 | 5 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| N. WyattLB | 11 | 6 | — | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | — |
| W. StratonLB | 11 | 8 | — | 0.5 | 0.5 | — | 0 | — |
| D. AustinS | 10 | 5 | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | — |
| D. WilliamsLB | 9 | 3 | — | 1.5 | 0.5 | — | 1 | — |
| Z. GrishamDB | 9 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| S. LauleaCB | 7 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — |
| S. DavisS | 6 | 3 | — | 0.5 | 0.5 | — | 0 | — |
| J. JohnsonDL | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| K. MothudiLB | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| M. JohnsonDE | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| B. PlattLB | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| E. RushingLB | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| G. NixLB | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| R. Saleapaga IITE | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| I. LalouluOL | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. LimarRB | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| A. SappingtonPK | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| C. RushingDB | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| D. FieldsDB | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. JohnsonTE | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. Ferguson-ReynoldsP | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. HarrisRB | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. DavisonRB | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| T. HaastrupEDGE | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| X. SimsDL | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| A. BrelandDL | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| M. BensonWR | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 936 | 444 | 0 | 75 | 30 | 15 | 69 | 0 |
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Kicking & Scoring
| PLAYER | FGM | FGA | FG% | XPM | XPA | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. SappingtonPK | 19 | 24 | — | 51 | 51 | 108 |
| G. HurychPK | 0 | 1 | — | 16 | 16 | 16 |
| TEAM TOTALS | 19 | 25 | 76.0 | 67 | 67 | 124 |
TEAM NEWS + STATTAKE ARTICLES
ALL CFB NEWS →Latest Oregon coverage
NATIONAL UPDATE
Oregon news: Star tight end Jamari Johnson headlines injury report vs.
Oregon news: Star tight end Jamari Johnson headlines injury report vs. USC. Oregon football already suffered a shocking loss in 2026, d ropping a Week 2 road game against Oklahoma State as a heavy favorite. Of course, that doesn’t knock the Ducks out of College Football Playoff contention just yet, but with a tough Big Ten schedule ahead, it certainly puts Dan Lanning and company behind the 8-ball.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATE2026 Big Ten Title Odds: Ohio State leads Polymarket odds after Week 3 of season.
A new Polymarket prediction market lists nine Big Ten football teams with 3% or greater odds to win the Big Ten Championship this season. Ryan Day ‘s Ohio State Buckeyes , which haven’t won a Big Ten title since 2020, are currently trending as an early season favorite with 36% odds as of 11:30 pm ET on Sept. 23 . They sit just ahead of Indiana (25%) and Oregon (12%). Penn State and USC also currently sit at or above 6% odds. Key points from the original article: • Ohio State Buckeyes – 36% • Indiana Hoosiers – 25% • Oregon Ducks – 12% • T4. Penn State Nittany Lions – 6% • T4. USC Trojans – 6% • T6. Michigan Wolverines – 4% • T6. UCLA Bruins – 4% • T8. Iowa Hawkeyes – 3% • T8. Northwestern Wildcats – 3% • Teams 10-18
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEUSC Cornerback Jontez Williams Clarifies Injury Status.
USC Cornerback Jontez Williams Clarifies Injury Status. Cornerback Jontez Williams believes that No. 12 USC Trojans' defense will get back on track in their top-25 matchup versus the No. 20 Oregon Ducks in Week 4 (Sept.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATE5 key takeaways from Big Ten football after Week 3.
5 key takeaways from Big Ten football after Week 3. After Week 3 the Big Ten does not have a clear consensus on who will win the conference, just many potential contenders in a cluttered race Each week continues to be filled with new and intriguing storylines in the Big Ten. The Big Ten is as deep and competitive as it's ever been. Key points from the original article: 1. Oregon's offense is still elite 2. Penn State will be a problem this season 3. The Big Ten is deeper than just top two teams 4. Indiana should be ranked higher 5. UCLA is a huge dark horse in this conference
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEJeremiah McClellan injury update: Oregon WR broke foot in pregame, out indefinitely.
Jeremiah McClellan injury update: Oregon WR broke foot in pregame, out indefinitely. Oregon receiver Jeremiah McClellan broke his foot during pregame in Week 3, a big blow for the Ducks ahead of USC matchup.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEOregon wide receiver Jeremiah McClellan suffers broken foot.
This was year No. 3 for McClellan in Eugene after breaking out last season. He had caught seven passes for 170 yards and a touchdown through two. Most of the production did come in the opener against Boise State , where McClellan had six of those receptions and 150 yards. You can add the touchdown in there as well. [ $19.99 gets you a FULL year of On3 | Rivals national coverage ] Looking back to 2025, McClellan was a key contributor in all 15 games. This includes the College Football Playoff , where he totaled 13 catches for 160 yards in three games vs. James Madison , Texas Tech , and Indiana . Not a bad sophomore campaign by any stretch of the imagination.
READ UPDATE →FEATURED STATTAKEOklahoma State Didn’t Steal This From Oregon. It Took It.
The eight-point upset will be remembered as Oregon collapsing. The 554–281 yardage gap says Oklahoma State controlled far more of the afternoon than the final score suggests.
READ UPDATE →RANKINGS OPINIONDid Oregon Drop Four Spots Because Voters Only Read the Score?
The Ducks beat Boise State by seven but won the yardage battle by 223. What were AP voters actually grading?
READ UPDATE →ROSTER BUILDING
RECRUITING HUB →Recruiting & development
Recruiting to production
See how efficiently signed talent develops into starts, impact and wins.
What transfers added
Separate returning development from incoming and outgoing portal value.
PROGRAM CONTEXT
TEAM TRENDS →History & trends
Wins, efficiency and schedule strength in one timeline.
Home, road, favorite and underdog performance.
Recent form versus the long-term series story.
Drafted players by position and development path.
Illinois
Maryland
Michigan
Michigan State