Georgia
BYU
Washington State
Stanford
Arizona
UCLA
California
Colorado
Washington
Utah
Oregon State
North CarolinaFour-year talent direction
Track class strength, position balance and roster needs across signing cycles.
STATTAKE DATABASEFIND ANY TEAM OR PLAYER
Big Ten • FBS TEAM DATABASE
Oregon
Complete schedules, team production, player statistics, news, analytics, recruiting and program history in one fan destination.
2022 SEASON DATABASE
Oregon football
Record: 10–3 (Schedule & Results)
Conference: Big Ten
Players: 67
Points For: 504
Points/Game: 38.8
Points Against: 356
Opp. Points/Game: 27.4
2022 SEASON
LIVE SCOREBOARD →Schedule & results
OFFICIAL SCHEDULE FEEDOpponent names and logos open team pages. Dates and results open StatTake box scores.
WEEKOPPONENTLOCATIONGAME
WEEK 7BYE——
POSTSEASONBOWL & PLAYOFF GAMES
TEAM PRODUCTION
Team stats
Season totals organized for quick comparison. Swipe horizontally for more.
2022 SEASON TOTALS
ALL GAMESOffense at a glance
| PASS CMP | PASS ATT | PASS YDS | PASS % | PASS AVG | PASS TD | PASS INT | PASS RTG | SACK | RUSH ATT | RUSH YDS | RUSH AVG | RUSH TD | REC | REC YDS | REC AVG | REC TD | PTS/G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 308 | 432 | 3,703 | 71.3 | 8.6 | 30 | 9 | 162.0 | 0 | 496 | 2,831 | 5.7 | 34 | 308 | 3,703 | 12.0 | 30 | 38.8 |
TEAM ANALYTICS CENTER
OPEN NATIONAL ANALYTICS →Oregon analytics
LOADING 2022 EPA METRICS
The verified team snapshot is loading now.
2022 COMPLETE TEAM ROSTER
PLAYER PROFILES →Individual player statistics
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Passing
| PLAYER | CMP | ATT | YDS | CMP% | AVG | TD | INT | RTG | SACK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B. NixQB | 294 | 408 | 3594 | 72.1 | 8.8 | 29 | 7 | 166.1 | — |
| T. ThompsonTE | 11 | 21 | 72 | 52.4 | 3.4 | 0 | 2 | 62.1 | — |
| B. IrvingRB | 2 | 2 | 36 | 100.0 | 18.0 | 1 | 0 | 416.2 | — |
| J. ButterfieldQB | 1 | 1 | 1 | 100.0 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 108.4 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 308 | 432 | 3,703 | 71.3 | 8.6 | 30 | 9 | 162.0 | 0 |
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Rushing
| PLAYER | CAR | YDS | AVG | LNG | TD | FUM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B. IrvingRB | 155 | 1052 | 6.8 | 66 | 5 | — |
| N. WhittingtonRB | 139 | 781 | 5.6 | 55 | 5 | — |
| B. NixQB | 88 | 514 | 5.8 | 80 | 14 | — |
| J. JamesRB | 46 | 189 | 4.1 | 24 | 5 | — |
| S. DollarsRB | 34 | 188 | 5.5 | 20 | 1 | — |
| B. Cardwell Jr.RB | 11 | 76 | 6.9 | 16 | 1 | — |
| K. HaasenritterDB | 9 | 46 | 5.1 | 9 | 1 | — |
| D. Thornton Jr.WR | 2 | 6 | 3.0 | 9 | 0 | — |
| C. GonzalezDB | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 3 | 0 | — |
| M. MatavaoTE | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 3 | 1 | — |
| N. SewellLB | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | — |
| T. ThompsonTE | 5 | -6 | -1.2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| A. BalesPK | 1 | -11 | -11.0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| S. McGeeWR | 3 | -11 | -3.7 | 6 | 0 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 496 | 2,831 | 5.7 | 80 | 34 | 0 |
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Receiving
| PLAYER | REC | YDS | AVG | LNG | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T. FranklinWR | 61 | 891 | 14.6 | 67 | 9 |
| C. CotaWR | 36 | 497 | 13.8 | 49 | 3 |
| K. HutsonWR | 44 | 473 | 10.8 | 58 | 0 |
| T. FergusonTE | 32 | 391 | 12.2 | 53 | 5 |
| D. Thornton Jr.WR | 17 | 366 | 21.5 | 58 | 1 |
| B. IrvingRB | 31 | 299 | 9.6 | 37 | 3 |
| N. WhittingtonRB | 22 | 169 | 7.7 | 29 | 1 |
| S. DollarsRB | 16 | 143 | 8.9 | 39 | 0 |
| M. MatavaoTE | 10 | 134 | 13.4 | 24 | 1 |
| P. HerbertTE | 6 | 95 | 15.8 | 40 | 1 |
| S. McGeeWR | 11 | 67 | 6.1 | 15 | 0 |
| C. McCormickTE | 10 | 66 | 6.6 | 17 | 3 |
| B. NixQB | 2 | 36 | 18.0 | 18 | 1 |
| B. Cardwell Jr.RB | 4 | 34 | 8.5 | 13 | 1 |
| C. ChapmanWR | 1 | 15 | 15.0 | 15 | 0 |
| J. DelgadoWR | 1 | 12 | 12.0 | 12 | 0 |
| J. JamesRB | 1 | 6 | 6.0 | 6 | 0 |
| J. Conerly Jr.OL | 1 | 4 | 4.0 | 4 | 1 |
| K. KasperWR | 1 | 4 | 4.0 | 4 | 0 |
| K. HaasenritterDB | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 |
| TEAM TOTALS | 308 | 3,703 | 12.0 | 67 | 30 |
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Defense
| PLAYER | TOT | SOLO | AST | TFL | SACK | INT | PD | FF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B. WilliamsDB | 67 | 45 | — | 1.5 | 1 | 2 | 6 | — |
| J. BassaLB | 57 | 26 | — | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| N. SewellLB | 55 | 24 | — | 5.5 | 1.5 | 1 | 3 | — |
| C. GonzalezDB | 51 | 35 | — | 1 | 0 | 4 | 7 | — |
| T. BridgesDB | 47 | 29 | — | 1.0 | 0 | 3 | 5 | — |
| J. HillLB | 45 | 32 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 3 | — |
| S. Stephens IVDB | 40 | 21 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — |
| D. JohnsonLB | 39 | 15 | — | 8.5 | 6 | — | 2 | — |
| B. DorlusDE | 35 | 16 | — | 9.5 | 2.5 | — | 2 | — |
| J. FloweLB | 35 | 14 | — | 2.5 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| C. RogersDL | 30 | 13 | — | 3.0 | 0 | — | 2 | — |
| B. AddisonDB | 27 | 18 | — | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | — |
| M. FunaLB | 25 | 9 | — | 2.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | — |
| J. RileyDL | 19 | 7 | — | 1.5 | 0.5 | — | 1 | — |
| K. Ware-HudsonDT | 19 | 10 | — | 3.5 | 0.5 | — | 2 | — |
| D. ManningDB | 18 | 14 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| K. BrownLB | 14 | 8 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — |
| J. LaDukeLB | 13 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. GreenfieldDB | 12 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| T. TaimaniDL | 11 | 4 | — | 1.0 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| T. Ma'aeDL | 11 | 6 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | — |
| B. SwinsonDE | 8 | 5 | — | 1.5 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| D. DavidS | 8 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. FlorenceCB | 8 | 6 | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — |
| K. TerrellCB | 6 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. ShipleyDL | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| B. RobertsDL | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| D. BarkinsCB | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| A. BoylePK | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| B. BoettcherLB | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| I. BrevardWR | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. TuckerCB | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| K. WilliamsDT | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| M. RothLB | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| A. Jones Jr.EDGE | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| A. DickersonCB | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| B. IrvingRB | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| C. ChapmanWR | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| C. McCormickTE | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| C. LewisPK | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| D. JacksonLB | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| D. Thornton Jr.WR | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. JamesRB | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. DelgadoWR | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. LoweWR | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| K. HaasenritterDB | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| K. KasperWR | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| M. VidackovicDB | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| N. WhittingtonRB | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| Z. GrishamDB | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| S. MellsDE | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 739 | 399 | 0 | 51 | 17 | 16 | 46 | 0 |
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Kicking & Scoring
| PLAYER | FGM | FGA | FG% | XPM | XPA | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. LewisPK | 14 | 16 | — | 64 | 64 | 106 |
| TEAM TOTALS | 14 | 16 | 87.5 | 64 | 64 | 106 |
TEAM NEWS + STATTAKE ARTICLES
ALL CFB NEWS →Latest Oregon coverage
NATIONAL UPDATE
Will Ole Miss Extend Streak?
Will Ole Miss Extend Streak? Can USC Top Oregon? Joel Klatt's Week 4 CFB Picks. Week 4 is filled with multiple top-25 games and conference showdowns, take a look at Joel Klatt's picks.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEOregon news: Star tight end Jamari Johnson headlines injury report vs.
Oregon news: Star tight end Jamari Johnson headlines injury report vs. USC. Oregon football already suffered a shocking loss in 2026, d ropping a Week 2 road game against Oklahoma State as a heavy favorite. Of course, that doesn’t knock the Ducks out of College Football Playoff contention just yet, but with a tough Big Ten schedule ahead, it certainly puts Dan Lanning and company behind the 8-ball.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATE2026 Big Ten Title Odds: Ohio State leads Polymarket odds after Week 3 of season.
A new Polymarket prediction market lists nine Big Ten football teams with 3% or greater odds to win the Big Ten Championship this season. Ryan Day ‘s Ohio State Buckeyes , which haven’t won a Big Ten title since 2020, are currently trending as an early season favorite with 36% odds as of 11:30 pm ET on Sept. 23 . They sit just ahead of Indiana (25%) and Oregon (12%). Penn State and USC also currently sit at or above 6% odds. Key points from the original article: • Ohio State Buckeyes – 36% • Indiana Hoosiers – 25% • Oregon Ducks – 12% • T4. Penn State Nittany Lions – 6% • T4. USC Trojans – 6% • T6. Michigan Wolverines – 4% • T6. UCLA Bruins – 4% • T8. Iowa Hawkeyes – 3% • T8. Northwestern Wildcats – 3% • Teams 10-18
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEUSC Cornerback Jontez Williams Clarifies Injury Status.
USC Cornerback Jontez Williams Clarifies Injury Status. Cornerback Jontez Williams believes that No. 12 USC Trojans' defense will get back on track in their top-25 matchup versus the No. 20 Oregon Ducks in Week 4 (Sept.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATE5 key takeaways from Big Ten football after Week 3.
5 key takeaways from Big Ten football after Week 3. After Week 3 the Big Ten does not have a clear consensus on who will win the conference, just many potential contenders in a cluttered race Each week continues to be filled with new and intriguing storylines in the Big Ten. The Big Ten is as deep and competitive as it's ever been. Key points from the original article: 1. Oregon's offense is still elite 2. Penn State will be a problem this season 3. The Big Ten is deeper than just top two teams 4. Indiana should be ranked higher 5. UCLA is a huge dark horse in this conference
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEJeremiah McClellan injury update: Oregon WR broke foot in pregame, out indefinitely.
Jeremiah McClellan injury update: Oregon WR broke foot in pregame, out indefinitely. Oregon receiver Jeremiah McClellan broke his foot during pregame in Week 3, a big blow for the Ducks ahead of USC matchup.
READ UPDATE →FEATURED STATTAKEOklahoma State Didn’t Steal This From Oregon. It Took It.
The eight-point upset will be remembered as Oregon collapsing. The 554–281 yardage gap says Oklahoma State controlled far more of the afternoon than the final score suggests.
READ UPDATE →RANKINGS OPINIONDid Oregon Drop Four Spots Because Voters Only Read the Score?
The Ducks beat Boise State by seven but won the yardage battle by 223. What were AP voters actually grading?
READ UPDATE →ROSTER BUILDING
RECRUITING HUB →Recruiting & development
Recruiting to production
See how efficiently signed talent develops into starts, impact and wins.
What transfers added
Separate returning development from incoming and outgoing portal value.
PROGRAM CONTEXT
TEAM TRENDS →History & trends
Wins, efficiency and schedule strength in one timeline.
Home, road, favorite and underdog performance.
Recent form versus the long-term series story.
Drafted players by position and development path.
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Maryland
Michigan
Michigan State