Miami (OH)
UCF
Syracuse
Virginia Tech
North Carolina
Boston College
Miami
Georgia Tech
Florida State
Louisville
CaliforniaFour-year talent direction
Track class strength, position balance and roster needs across signing cycles.
STATTAKE DATABASEFIND ANY TEAM OR PLAYER
ACC • FBS TEAM DATABASE
Pittsburgh
Complete schedules, team production, player statistics, news, analytics, recruiting and program history in one fan destination.
2026 SEASON DATABASE
Pittsburgh football
Record: 3–0 (Schedule & Results)
Conference: ACC
Players: 51
Points For: 98
Points/Game: 32.7
Points Against: 34
Opp. Points/Game: 11.3
2026 SEASON
LIVE SCOREBOARD →Schedule & results
OFFICIAL SCHEDULE FEEDOpponent names and logos open team pages. Dates and results open StatTake box scores.
WEEKOPPONENTLOCATIONGAME
WEEK 10BYE——
TEAM PRODUCTION
Team stats
Season totals organized for quick comparison. Swipe horizontally for more.
2026 SEASON TOTALS
ALL GAMESOffense at a glance
| PASS CMP | PASS ATT | PASS YDS | PASS % | PASS AVG | PASS TD | PASS INT | PASS RTG | SACK | RUSH ATT | RUSH YDS | RUSH AVG | RUSH TD | REC | REC YDS | REC AVG | REC TD | PTS/G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 62 | 96 | 815 | 64.6 | 8.5 | 7 | 1 | 157.9 | 0 | 106 | 520 | 4.9 | 5 | 62 | 815 | 13.1 | 7 | 32.7 |
TEAM ANALYTICS CENTER
OPEN NATIONAL ANALYTICS →Pittsburgh analytics
LOADING 2026 EPA METRICS
The verified team snapshot is loading now.
2026 COMPLETE TEAM ROSTER
PLAYER PROFILES →Individual player statistics
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Passing
| PLAYER | CMP | ATT | YDS | CMP% | AVG | TD | INT | RTG | SACK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M. HeintschelQB | 59 | 93 | 788 | 63.4 | 8.5 | 7 | 1 | 157.3 | — |
| H. GerinerQB | 3 | 3 | 27 | 100.0 | 9.0 | 0 | 0 | 175.6 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 62 | 96 | 815 | 64.6 | 8.5 | 7 | 1 | 157.9 | 0 |
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Rushing
| PLAYER | CAR | YDS | AVG | LNG | TD | FUM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D. Ferguson Jr.RB | 36 | 183 | 5.1 | 33 | 2 | — |
| L. WrightRB | 31 | 141 | 4.5 | 16 | 1 | — |
| M. HeintschelQB | 23 | 77 | 3.3 | 18 | 1 | — |
| J. CookRB | 2 | 73 | 36.5 | 50 | 1 | — |
| J. TurnerRB | 11 | 39 | 3.5 | 14 | 0 | — |
| H. GerinerQB | 1 | 5 | 5.0 | 5 | 0 | — |
| T. RobinsonWR | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 2 | 0 | — |
| J. BrownRB | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 106 | 520 | 4.9 | 50 | 5 | 0 |
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Receiving
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Defense
| PLAYER | TOT | SOLO | AST | TFL | SACK | INT | PD | FF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. BrookinsDB | 18 | 11 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| J. GuerrierDB | 18 | 11 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| A. Sanford Jr.LB | 16 | 5 | — | 3.5 | 1 | — | 0 | — |
| J. MarcelinLB | 15 | 3 | — | 1.5 | 0.5 | — | 0 | — |
| B. LovelaceLB | 12 | 6 | — | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| D. WardLB | 12 | 5 | — | 1.5 | 0.5 | — | 0 | — |
| R. StraderDB | 10 | 8 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — |
| S. Lee Jr.DB | 10 | 7 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| I. NealDL | 8 | 4 | — | 2.5 | 1 | — | 0 | — |
| S. FitzSimmonsDL | 8 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — |
| A. BryantDB | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| N. JamesDL | 6 | 4 | — | 3.5 | 2 | — | 0 | — |
| A. IbrahimLB | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. MooreDL | 3 | 0 | — | 0.5 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. ScottDL | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| T. ForneyDB | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| Z. CrothersDL | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 3 | — |
| C. WoodsonDB | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| L. HokeDL | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| S. HarrisonDB | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| B. HamiltonWR | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| B. YatesWR | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| C. LindseyLB | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| D. Ferguson Jr.RB | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| D. BrewtonLB | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| E. NairneDL | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. BonsuLB | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. PittmanDL | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. ThompsonLB | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| K. McRae Jr.DB | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| R. MurrayDB | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — |
| T. KinslerWR | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| T. YuhasDL | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| Z. FergusonDB | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| M. JenningsLB | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 174 | 94 | 0 | 19 | 7 | 3 | 8 | 0 |
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Kicking & Scoring
| PLAYER | FGM | FGA | FG% | XPM | XPA | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. ChadhaPK | 4 | 4 | — | 11 | 11 | 23 |
| S. HunsakerPK | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| TEAM TOTALS | 4 | 4 | 100.0 | 12 | 12 | 24 |
TEAM NEWS + STATTAKE ARTICLES
ALL CFB NEWS →Latest Pittsburgh coverage
NATIONAL UPDATE
For UCF, the sky isn’t falling when it comes to offensive struggles.
For UCF, the sky isn’t falling when it comes to offensive struggles. Two weeks into the football season, UCF faces an identity problem. In the season opener, the Knights looked like offensive juggernauts, totaling 560 yards while scoring a school-record 73 points in a dominating 73-6 win over Bethune-Cookman. A week later, UCF looked anemic on offense, managing just 206 yards of offense in a disappointing 12-7 loss at Pittsburgh last Saturday.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEPittsburgh: Heintschel ties Pitt record with 7 TD passes in win.
Heintschel ties Pitt record with 7 TD passes in win. Sophomore Mason Heintschel threw seven touchdown passes, tying the school record, and Pittsburgh rolled to a 59-14 win against Miami (Ohio) on Saturday.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEMiami (Ohio): Mason Heintschel Throws For 7 Touchdowns as Pitt Dominates Miami Ohio.
Mason Heintschel Throws For 7 Touchdowns as Pitt Dominates Miami Ohio. Pitt couldn’t have asked for a better start to the 2026 season, and sophomore quarterback Mason Heintschel was at the center of it. The Panthers crushed Miami (Ohio) 59-14 Saturday at Acrisure Stadium, with Heintschel putting together a record-setting performance that immediately put him on the college football radar.
READ UPDATE →ROSTER BUILDING
RECRUITING HUB →Recruiting & development
Recruiting to production
See how efficiently signed talent develops into starts, impact and wins.
What transfers added
Separate returning development from incoming and outgoing portal value.
PROGRAM CONTEXT
TEAM TRENDS →History & trends
Wins, efficiency and schedule strength in one timeline.
Home, road, favorite and underdog performance.
Recent form versus the long-term series story.
Drafted players by position and development path.
Clemson
Duke