Ole Miss
SMU
Wake Forest
NC State
Florida State
Syracuse
Stanford
Georgia Tech
North Carolina
Pittsburgh
KentuckyFour-year talent direction
Track class strength, position balance and roster needs across signing cycles.
STATTAKE DATABASEFIND ANY TEAM OR PLAYER
ACC • FBS TEAM DATABASE
Louisville
Complete schedules, team production, player statistics, news, analytics, recruiting and program history in one fan destination.
2026 SEASON DATABASE
Louisville football
Record: 6–3 (Schedule & Results)
Conference: ACC
Players: 60
Points For: 367
Points/Game: 40.8
Points Against: 233
Opp. Points/Game: 25.9
2026 SEASON
LIVE SCOREBOARD →Schedule & results
OFFICIAL SCHEDULE FEEDOpponent names and logos open team pages. Dates and results open StatTake box scores.
WEEKOPPONENTLOCATIONGAME
WEEK 8BYE——
TEAM PRODUCTION
Team stats
Season totals organized for quick comparison. Swipe horizontally for more.
2026 SEASON TOTALS
ALL GAMESOffense at a glance
| PASS CMP | PASS ATT | PASS YDS | PASS % | PASS AVG | PASS TD | PASS INT | PASS RTG | SACK | RUSH ATT | RUSH YDS | RUSH AVG | RUSH TD | REC | REC YDS | REC AVG | REC TD | PTS/G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 165 | 241 | 2,341 | 68.5 | 9.7 | 15 | 3 | 168.1 | 0 | 310 | 2,118 | 6.8 | 32 | 165 | 2,341 | 14.2 | 15 | 40.8 |
TEAM ANALYTICS CENTER
OPEN NATIONAL ANALYTICS →Louisville analytics
LOADING 2026 EPA METRICS
The verified team snapshot is loading now.
2026 COMPLETE TEAM ROSTER
PLAYER PROFILES →Individual player statistics
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Passing
| PLAYER | CMP | ATT | YDS | CMP% | AVG | TD | INT | RTG | SACK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L. KienholzQB | 158 | 233 | 2276 | 67.8 | 9.8 | 14 | 3 | 167.1 | — |
| D. WydnerQB | 4 | 5 | 42 | 80.0 | 8.4 | 1 | 0 | 216.6 | — |
| B. CherryQB | 2 | 2 | 24 | 100.0 | 12.0 | 0 | 0 | 200.8 | — |
| R. ZimmermanQB | 1 | 1 | -1 | 100.0 | -1.0 | 0 | 0 | 91.6 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 165 | 241 | 2,341 | 68.5 | 9.7 | 15 | 3 | 168.1 | 0 |
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Rushing
| PLAYER | CAR | YDS | AVG | LNG | TD | FUM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I. BrownRB | 99 | 745 | 7.5 | 97 | 8 | — |
| K. BrownRB | 67 | 521 | 7.8 | 58 | 5 | — |
| L. KienholzQB | 89 | 394 | 4.4 | 82 | 11 | — |
| T. RichardsonWR | 11 | 169 | 15.4 | 52 | 2 | — |
| M. DavisRB | 22 | 147 | 6.7 | 39 | 3 | — |
| B. JenningsRB | 13 | 101 | 7.8 | 44 | 3 | — |
| L. ThompkinsRB | 8 | 37 | 4.6 | 19 | 0 | — |
| D. WydnerQB | 1 | 4 | 4.0 | 4 | 0 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 310 | 2,118 | 6.8 | 97 | 32 | 0 |
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Receiving
| PLAYER | REC | YDS | AVG | LNG | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T. RichardsonWR | 44 | 685 | 15.6 | 62 | 3 |
| L. McCoyWR | 25 | 513 | 20.5 | 61 | 4 |
| T. HurryWR | 39 | 474 | 12.2 | 35 | 2 |
| J. SkinnerTE | 20 | 332 | 16.6 | 69 | 3 |
| I. BrownRB | 16 | 145 | 9.1 | 46 | 2 |
| J. VothWR | 3 | 41 | 13.7 | 27 | 0 |
| J. ReidTE | 2 | 35 | 17.5 | 20 | 0 |
| K. BrownRB | 5 | 35 | 7.0 | 13 | 0 |
| T. McWilliams Jr.WR | 4 | 31 | 7.8 | 12 | 0 |
| M. HarbinWR | 2 | 24 | 12.0 | 14 | 0 |
| B. FoleyTE | 3 | 12 | 4.0 | 10 | 0 |
| E. LewisWR | 1 | 12 | 12.0 | 12 | 0 |
| B. JenningsRB | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 2 | 1 |
| TEAM TOTALS | 165 | 2,341 | 14.2 | 69 | 15 |
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Defense
| PLAYER | TOT | SOLO | AST | TFL | SACK | INT | PD | FF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S. ClarkLB | 64 | 19 | — | 5.0 | 0.5 | 1 | 5 | — |
| T. CapersLB | 61 | 29 | — | 2.0 | 0.5 | — | 3 | — |
| K. BeasleyDB | 59 | 28 | — | 2.0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | — |
| B. PerryLB | 43 | 20 | — | 3.5 | 2.5 | — | 4 | — |
| C. LubinDL | 42 | 18 | — | 7.5 | 6.5 | — | 0 | — |
| T. BanksDB | 38 | 24 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| K. EntringerDB | 35 | 14 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| D. KennedyDL | 25 | 6 | — | 3.0 | 1.0 | — | 0 | — |
| T. ThompsonDL | 25 | 14 | — | 6.5 | 5.5 | — | 1 | — |
| T. HollowayDB | 24 | 15 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 5 | — |
| B. RuffinDB | 20 | 6 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — |
| J. Smith IIDL | 20 | 8 | — | 5.0 | 2 | — | 0 | — |
| J. MackDB | 19 | 11 | — | 0.5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | — |
| C. WhiteLB | 18 | 8 | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — |
| A. GreenDL | 17 | 6 | — | 3.0 | 2 | — | 2 | — |
| B. ScottDB | 17 | 11 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 3 | — |
| D. RussellDL | 17 | 8 | — | 1.5 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| D. Waller Jr.CB | 17 | 12 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| J. DonaldDL | 17 | 5 | — | 2.0 | 0.5 | — | 0 | — |
| M. CarterDL | 15 | 8 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| K. PerryLB | 14 | 11 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| T. ZiesmerDL | 11 | 4 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | — |
| B. AbercrombieDL | 10 | 2 | — | 0.5 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| T. CarterLB | 10 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| A. WattsDB | 7 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| E. HazzardDL | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| A. HarrisDB | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| M. NorwoodDB | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| D. KegebeinLS | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| K. WebbDL | 3 | 2 | — | 0.5 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| D. SmithDL | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| M. DavisDL | 2 | 1 | — | 0.5 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| M. RiceDB | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — |
| I. BrownRB | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. SmithLB | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. Glover-TysonOL | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. VannS | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| L. RobinsonOL | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| L. McCoyWR | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| M. HarbinWR | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 679 | 309 | 0 | 48 | 23 | 9 | 39 | 0 |
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Kicking & Scoring
| PLAYER | FGM | FGA | FG% | XPM | XPA | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. HilbertPK | 11 | 14 | — | 41 | 44 | 74 |
| G. WhitePK | 0 | 0 | — | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| N. KellerPK | 0 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| TEAM TOTALS | 11 | 15 | 73.3 | 44 | 47 | 77 |
TEAM NEWS + STATTAKE ARTICLES
ALL CFB NEWS →Latest Louisville coverage
NATIONAL UPDATE
COLLEGE FOOTBALL NOTES: DV grad Black scores touchdown for Stanford.
COLLEGE FOOTBALL NOTES: DV grad Black scores touchdown for Stanford. Aiden Black hit paydirt. The Delaware Valley graduate hauled in a 75-yard touchdown pass last week in Stanford’s 52-24 loss to Louisville in an Atlantic Coast Conference game. It was Black’s only catch and his first touchdown of the season.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEPlane flies banner calling for Mike Norvell, Peter Collins firing prior to Florida…
Well, ahead of Saturday's game against Clemson, a plane The Seminoles enter Saturday night’s game at 3-4 on the season, including 1-3 in ACC play. They’ve lost two games in a row, both on the road against Louisville and Miami. We’ll look past the fact that the banner incorrectly spelled Norvell as “Novell.” But still, it just shows how loud the noise has truly gotten in Tallahassee. Kickoff between Florida State and Clemson is set for 7:00 PM Eastern on Saturday night. The game will be broadcasted on ACC Network on Halloween. In seven seasons now, he has coached to a 41-38 overall record, including 23-29 in ACC play.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEWake Forest: ESPN updates FPI rankings for every ACC football team after Week 8.
ESPN has updated its FPI metrics following Week 8 of the college football season and there's a new pecking order in the Big 12. Week 8 of the college football season is in the books, and while it didn't have quite as many massive upsets as Week 7, it still had plenty. After all of the action, ESPN has updated its FPI rankings for every Big 12 team. There was plenty of movement, courtesy of a handful of losses by top teams, including BYU and Texas Tech . Key points from the original article: 1. Utah Utes 2. Texas Tech Red Raiders 3. BYU Cougars 4. Houston Cougars 5. Arizona Wildcats 6. Oklahoma State Cowboys 7. Baylor Bears 8. TCU Horned Frogs 9. UCF Knights 10. Cincinnati Bearcats 11. Kansas State Wildcats 12. Kansas Jayhawks 13. West Virginia Mountaineers 14. Iowa State Cyclones 15. Arizona State Sun Devils 16. Colorado Buffaloes
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATELouisville: Week 9 college fantasy football rankings: Easton Messer, Jesse Legree…
Week 9 college fantasy football rankings: Easton Messer, Jesse Legree crack top 5. Malachi Toney holds FLEX2 after a record 16-catch day, while Louisville’s Lincoln Kienholz debuts at QB1 against a Stanford defense allowing 39. 6 points per game.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEWake Forest: ESPN updates FPI rankings for every ACC football team after Week 6.
ESPN has updated its FPI, the Football Power Index, a set of analytics. It ranked the Big 12 teams through Week 6 of the season. Week 6 has concluded in college football, bringing us to the midway point of the season already. The Big 12 has provided some thoroughly entertaining Key points from the original article: 1. Utah Utes FPI: 18.8 | National: 10 2. Texas Tech Red Raiders FPI: 18.6 | National: 11 3. BYU Cougars FPI: 15.7 | National: 14 4. Houston Cougars FPI: 14.8 | National: 18 5. Baylor Bears FPI: 11.1 | National: 33 6. Arizona Wildcats FPI: 10.4 | National: 35 7. Oklahoma State Cowboys FPI: 8.3 | National: 42 8. Kansas State Wildcats FPI: 6.8 | National: 44 9. TCU Horned Frogs FPI: 6.6 | National: 47 10. UCF Knights FPI: 5.4 | National: 50 11. Kansas Jayhawks FPI: 4.9 | National: 52 12. Iowa State Cyclones FPI: 4.2 | National: 55 13. Cincinnati Bearcats FPI: 3.6 | National: 56 14. Arizona State Sun Devils FPI: -0.3 | National: 70 15. Colorado Buffaloes FPI: -0.4 | National: 71 16. West Virginia Mountaineers FPI: -0.4 | National Rank: 72
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEFlorida State: The 6 College Football Games to Watch in Week 6.
The 6 College Football Games to Watch in Week 6. Check out our conference preview for all the Big 10 action this weekend. Florida State at Louisville 7 p. m.
READ UPDATE →STATTAKEDoes Duke Have the ACC’s Best Résumé?
Miami has the ranking and Louisville has the signature win. Duke is the ACC team that has already stacked two Power Four victories, a road win and three different ways to control a game.
READ UPDATE →STATTAKELouisville Didn’t Replace SMU in the ACC’s First Tier. It Expanded It.
The Cardinals won 41–31 with explosive runs and three takeaways. The Mustangs gained more yards and first downs—which is exactly why the conference race just became more complicated.
READ UPDATE →ROSTER BUILDING
RECRUITING HUB →Recruiting & development
Recruiting to production
See how efficiently signed talent develops into starts, impact and wins.
What transfers added
Separate returning development from incoming and outgoing portal value.
PROGRAM CONTEXT
TEAM TRENDS →History & trends
Wins, efficiency and schedule strength in one timeline.
Home, road, favorite and underdog performance.
Recent form versus the long-term series story.
Drafted players by position and development path.
Boston College
California
Clemson
Duke