North Texas
Western Kentucky
Northwestern
Rutgers
Nebraska
Ohio State
Michigan
Minnesota
USC
Washington
PurdueFour-year talent direction
Track class strength, position balance and roster needs across signing cycles.
STATTAKE DATABASEFIND ANY TEAM OR PLAYER
Big Ten • FBS TEAM DATABASE
Indiana
Complete schedules, team production, player statistics, news, analytics, recruiting and program history in one fan destination.
2026 SEASON DATABASE
Indiana football
Record: 8–1 (Schedule & Results)
Conference: Big Ten
Players: 53
Points For: 292
Points/Game: 32.4
Points Against: 112
Opp. Points/Game: 12.4
2026 SEASON
LIVE SCOREBOARD →Schedule & results
OFFICIAL SCHEDULE FEEDOpponent names and logos open team pages. Dates and results open StatTake box scores.
WEEKOPPONENTLOCATIONGAME
WEEK 10BYE——
TEAM PRODUCTION
Team stats
Season totals organized for quick comparison. Swipe horizontally for more.
2026 SEASON TOTALS
ALL GAMESOffense at a glance
| PASS CMP | PASS ATT | PASS YDS | PASS % | PASS AVG | PASS TD | PASS INT | PASS RTG | SACK | RUSH ATT | RUSH YDS | RUSH AVG | RUSH TD | REC | REC YDS | REC AVG | REC TD | PTS/G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 138 | 231 | 2,100 | 59.7 | 9.1 | 22 | 2 | 165.8 | 0 | 312 | 1,688 | 5.4 | 13 | 138 | 2,100 | 15.2 | 22 | 32.4 |
TEAM ANALYTICS CENTER
OPEN NATIONAL ANALYTICS →Indiana analytics
LOADING 2026 EPA METRICS
The verified team snapshot is loading now.
2026 COMPLETE TEAM ROSTER
PLAYER PROFILES →Individual player statistics
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Passing
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Rushing
| PLAYER | CAR | YDS | AVG | LNG | TD | FUM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T. RichardRB | 113 | 745 | 6.6 | 57 | 6 | — |
| L. Beebe Jr.RB | 134 | 715 | 5.3 | 70 | 4 | — |
| G. WilsonQB | 8 | 71 | 8.9 | 43 | 1 | — |
| J. HooverQB | 33 | 54 | 1.6 | 16 | 2 | — |
| J. CampbellRB | 8 | 50 | 6.3 | 23 | 0 | — |
| S. CuonoRB | 13 | 46 | 3.5 | 9 | 0 | — |
| K. MartinRB | 3 | 7 | 2.3 | 6 | 0 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 312 | 1,688 | 5.4 | 70 | 13 | 0 |
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Receiving
| PLAYER | REC | YDS | AVG | LNG | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. BeckerWR | 50 | 875 | 17.5 | 79 | 9 |
| N. MarshWR | 38 | 669 | 17.6 | 75 | 8 |
| S. PrestonWR | 12 | 177 | 14.8 | 39 | 1 |
| D. ChandlerWR | 11 | 131 | 11.9 | 42 | 4 |
| T. MorrisWR | 11 | 99 | 9.0 | 22 | 0 |
| B. SchottTE | 3 | 54 | 18.0 | 25 | 0 |
| T. RichardRB | 5 | 49 | 9.8 | 38 | 0 |
| T. GibbsTE | 3 | 23 | 7.7 | 13 | 0 |
| J. WasserstromWR | 1 | 10 | 10.0 | 10 | 0 |
| L. Beebe Jr.RB | 3 | 7 | 2.3 | 3 | 0 |
| A. BarkerTE | 1 | 6 | 6.0 | 6 | 0 |
| TEAM TOTALS | 138 | 2,100 | 15.2 | 79 | 22 |
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Defense
| PLAYER | TOT | SOLO | AST | TFL | SACK | INT | PD | FF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I. JonesLB | 65 | 39 | — | 2.5 | 0 | 1 | 2 | — |
| R. HardyLB | 58 | 35 | — | 5.5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | — |
| P. ZachmanDB | 51 | 27 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 2 | — |
| A. FerrellDB | 46 | 21 | — | 1.0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | — |
| B. Baldwin Jr.DB | 37 | 16 | — | 4.0 | 3 | — | 1 | — |
| T. OsunsanmiDL | 34 | 22 | — | 15.5 | 10 | — | 0 | — |
| S. DaleyDL | 31 | 17 | — | 7.5 | 5 | — | 0 | — |
| T. TuckerDL | 31 | 13 | — | 3.5 | 1 | — | 0 | — |
| J. SavageLB | 25 | 15 | — | 5.0 | 1 | — | 2 | — |
| J. SharpeDB | 25 | 15 | — | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | — |
| M. LandinoDL | 20 | 13 | — | 6.0 | 5 | — | 1 | — |
| A. HarrisDB | 17 | 8 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — |
| J. HjelleDL | 16 | 7 | — | 3.5 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. BurnhamDL | 14 | 6 | — | 3.5 | 1 | — | 1 | — |
| R. GandyDB | 14 | 9 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| J. BellDB | 13 | 7 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. UtzingerLB | 12 | 8 | — | 1.5 | 1 | — | 0 | — |
| Q. SanksDB | 12 | 6 | — | 1.0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — |
| B. SmytheDL | 8 | 3 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — |
| C. ObiazorDL | 6 | 1 | — | 1.5 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| D. NdukweDL | 6 | 4 | — | 4.5 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| K. WyattDL | 6 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| K. TurnerLB | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| A. ChungDB | 4 | 0 | — | 0.5 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| K. CalhounDL | 4 | 3 | — | 2.5 | 2 | — | 0 | — |
| C. McHaneyDL | 3 | 0 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. OwensDB | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| L. MurffDB | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| C. WilliamsDB | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| D. ClausenLS | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| D. EvansOL | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| H. OhlingerLB | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| L. Beebe Jr.RB | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| P. ElmoreTE | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 573 | 307 | 0 | 76 | 32 | 7 | 22 | 0 |
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Kicking & Scoring
| PLAYER | FGM | FGA | FG% | XPM | XPA | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N. RadicicPK | 11 | 16 | — | 21 | 22 | 54 |
| P. McAteerPK | 2 | 4 | — | 12 | 13 | 18 |
| TEAM TOTALS | 13 | 20 | 65.0 | 33 | 35 | 72 |
TEAM NEWS + STATTAKE ARTICLES
ALL CFB NEWS →Latest Indiana coverage
NATIONAL UPDATE
Indiana’s Curt Cignetti stays cryptic on Josh Hoover vs.
Indiana’s Curt Cignetti stays cryptic on Josh Hoover vs. Grant Wilson QB decision vs. USC. Currently 8-1, the Indiana football program looks to return to the College Football Playoff in a few weeks.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEIndiana: Playoff expansion will not only mean more teams in the field and the end…
Playoff expansion will not only mean more teams in the field and the end of conference championship games, but also have a massive impact on the schedule going forward. Each team now has two bye weeks each season, but will need to make the most of that extra week off because teams in the Power Four will now have to play 10 Power Four opponents (or Notre Dame ) on their schedules. With each of those conferences expanding to nine-game conference schedules, teams must find one Power Four non-conference opponent to add to their schedules to qualify for College Football Playoff consideration. The majority of teams already hit that mark, but it will force a handful of programs to scramble over the coming months to adjust their 2027 schedules (and beyond) to meet that new requirement. A handful of teams are currently saved by the Oregon State and Washington State rule. For now, Oregon State and Washington State still count as P4 teams after the old Pac-12 abandoned them, and that will continue in 2027, sources told CBS Sports' Richard Johnson. Ole Miss plays the Beavers, and Washington , Arizona and Kansas all get the Cougars in 2027. The Notre Dame inclusion (along with various in-state
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEIndiana: Curt Cignetti not ready to name starting QB for No.
Curt Cignetti not ready to name starting QB for No. 4 Indiana's upcoming game against No. 20 USC. Josh Hoover has been Indiana's starting QB this year, but was replaced due to injury by Grant Wilson in the Hoosiers' last game.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATECollege Football 5 Thoughts: Iowa's CFP Case, Indiana's Schedule, and Is the Heism…
College Football 5 Thoughts: Iowa's CFP Case, Indiana's Schedule, and Is the Heisman Race Over?. After the biggest weekend of the season, is Iowa really a College Football Playoff team? What now for the Heisman, and what's the quirk in Indiana's schedule?
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEPrince goes crazy with 99-yard TD run, but Indiana State loses to Salukis.
Prince goes crazy with 99-yard TD run, but Indiana State loses to Salukis. No purple rain fell from the sky and nobody drove a little red Corvette. But Indiana State's Prince — redshirt junior running back Zechariah Prince, to be specific — dazzled the Memorial Stadium crowd with a school-record touchdown run of 99 yards early in the fourth quarter Saturday night. Unfortunately for the Sycamores, that couldn't overcome a succession of quarterback injuries and three ...
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATECollege football odds, lines, schedule for Week 11: LSU, Indiana open as favorites…
College football odds, lines, schedule for Week 11: LSU, Indiana open as favorites in key conference battles. Indiana hosts USC in a pivotal Big Ten clash while Georgia, LSU and unbeaten Utah navigate tricky conference tests as the playoff race heats up Week 11 of the college football season doesn't carry the same curb appeal as Week 10 in terms of ranked vs. ranked matchups. But it is nonetheless littered with challenging games for College Football Playoff hopefuls and national championship contenders. Key points from the original article: • The big games • Best of the rest
READ UPDATE →STATTAKEIs Indiana Already Better Than Last Year’s National Champion?
The opponents have not been strong enough to settle the argument. The Hoosiers’ balance, quarterback efficiency and defensive control are strong enough to make it a real one.
READ UPDATE →FEATURED ANALYSISSeven Teams Have 11-1 Title Odds. Only Three Were Top-12 on Both Sides.
The betting market sees a seven-team championship tier. StatTake’s 2025 efficiency data draws a sharper line around Ohio State, Oregon and Indiana—and exposes the different bets being made on Texas, Notre Dame, Georgia and Miami.
READ UPDATE →ROSTER BUILDING
RECRUITING HUB →Recruiting & development
Recruiting to production
See how efficiently signed talent develops into starts, impact and wins.
What transfers added
Separate returning development from incoming and outgoing portal value.
PROGRAM CONTEXT
TEAM TRENDS →History & trends
Wins, efficiency and schedule strength in one timeline.
Home, road, favorite and underdog performance.
Recent form versus the long-term series story.
Drafted players by position and development path.
Illinois
Iowa
Maryland
Michigan State