North Texas
Western Kentucky
Northwestern
Rutgers
Nebraska
Ohio State
Michigan
Minnesota
USC
Washington
PurdueFour-year talent direction
Track class strength, position balance and roster needs across signing cycles.
STATTAKE DATABASEFIND ANY TEAM OR PLAYER
Big Ten • FBS TEAM DATABASE
Indiana
Complete schedules, team production, player statistics, news, analytics, recruiting and program history in one fan destination.
2026 SEASON DATABASE
Indiana football
Record: 2–0 (Schedule & Results)
Conference: Big Ten
Players: 43
Points For: 107
Points/Game: 53.5
Points Against: 16
Opp. Points/Game: 8.0
2026 SEASON
LIVE SCOREBOARD →Schedule & results
OFFICIAL SCHEDULE FEEDOpponent names and logos open team pages. Dates and results open StatTake box scores.
WEEKOPPONENTLOCATIONGAME
WEEK 10BYE——
TEAM PRODUCTION
Team stats
Season totals organized for quick comparison. Swipe horizontally for more.
2026 SEASON TOTALS
ALL GAMESOffense at a glance
| PASS CMP | PASS ATT | PASS YDS | PASS % | PASS AVG | PASS TD | PASS INT | PASS RTG | SACK | RUSH ATT | RUSH YDS | RUSH AVG | RUSH TD | REC | REC YDS | REC AVG | REC TD | PTS/G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22 | 32 | 440 | 68.8 | 13.8 | 10 | 0 | 287.4 | 0 | 76 | 430 | 5.7 | 4 | 22 | 440 | 20.0 | 10 | 53.5 |
TEAM ANALYTICS CENTER
OPEN NATIONAL ANALYTICS →Indiana analytics
LOADING 2026 EPA METRICS
The verified team snapshot is loading now.
2026 COMPLETE TEAM ROSTER
PLAYER PROFILES →Individual player statistics
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Passing
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Rushing
| PLAYER | CAR | YDS | AVG | LNG | TD | FUM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T. RichardRB | 26 | 166 | 6.4 | 23 | 3 | — |
| L. Beebe Jr.RB | 30 | 145 | 4.8 | 21 | 0 | — |
| G. WilsonQB | 3 | 49 | 16.3 | 43 | 1 | — |
| J. CampbellRB | 5 | 36 | 7.2 | 23 | 0 | — |
| J. HooverQB | 6 | 18 | 3.0 | 11 | 0 | — |
| S. CuonoRB | 6 | 16 | 2.7 | 8 | 0 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 76 | 430 | 5.7 | 43 | 4 | 0 |
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Receiving
| PLAYER | REC | YDS | AVG | LNG | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. BeckerWR | 7 | 145 | 20.7 | 41 | 5 |
| N. MarshWR | 4 | 88 | 22.0 | 51 | 2 |
| S. PrestonWR | 2 | 49 | 24.5 | 39 | 1 |
| D. ChandlerWR | 2 | 45 | 22.5 | 42 | 2 |
| T. RichardRB | 2 | 43 | 21.5 | 38 | 0 |
| T. MorrisWR | 3 | 35 | 11.7 | 22 | 0 |
| B. SchottTE | 1 | 25 | 25.0 | 25 | 0 |
| J. WasserstromWR | 1 | 10 | 10.0 | 10 | 0 |
| TEAM TOTALS | 22 | 440 | 20.0 | 51 | 10 |
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Defense
| PLAYER | TOT | SOLO | AST | TFL | SACK | INT | PD | FF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I. JonesLB | 17 | 10 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| R. HardyLB | 12 | 6 | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — |
| B. Baldwin Jr.DB | 10 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| R. GandyDB | 8 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| A. FerrellDB | 6 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. SavageLB | 6 | 4 | — | 1.5 | 1 | — | 0 | — |
| J. UtzingerLB | 6 | 4 | — | 0.5 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| Q. SanksDB | 6 | 4 | — | 0.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — |
| S. DaleyDL | 6 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| T. OsunsanmiDL | 6 | 3 | — | 3.5 | 1 | — | 0 | — |
| J. HjelleDL | 5 | 2 | — | 1.5 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| P. ZachmanDB | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| A. ChungDB | 4 | 0 | — | 0.5 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| D. NdukweDL | 4 | 3 | — | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. BellDB | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. BurnhamDL | 4 | 1 | — | 0.5 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| C. ObiazorDL | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| K. TurnerLB | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| K. CalhounDL | 2 | 2 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — |
| L. MurffDB | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| M. LandinoDL | 2 | 1 | — | 1.5 | 1 | — | 0 | — |
| T. TuckerDL | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — |
| C. McHaneyDL | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| C. WilliamsDB | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| H. OhlingerLB | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. SharpeDB | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 126 | 66 | 0 | 19 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Kicking & Scoring
| PLAYER | FGM | FGA | FG% | XPM | XPA | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N. RadicicPK | 1 | 1 | — | 7 | 7 | 10 |
| P. McAteerPK | 0 | 0 | — | 7 | 8 | 7 |
| TEAM TOTALS | 1 | 1 | 100.0 | 14 | 15 | 17 |
TEAM NEWS + STATTAKE ARTICLES
ALL CFB NEWS →Latest Indiana coverage
NATIONAL UPDATE
Indiana: Can't Wait For Saturday I'm still going with the Buckeyes, but it will be…
Can't Wait For Saturday I'm still going with the Buckeyes, but it will be closer than most think. Sep. 25—*** You probably don't need a reminder, but the most lopsided outcome of Bret Bielema's head coaching career was a 53-point decision in 2025 at Indiana. To be fair, the Hoosiers went on to win the College Football Playoff title and finished with a perfect season.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEIndiana: Curt Cignetti dispels rumor teams lost communications on final Miami poss…
Of course, whenever the president is in town, security concerns can often result in additional complications for both fans and the teams involved. Earlier Thursday, Longhorns head coach Steve Sarkisian revealed the Secret Service temporarily halts all in-stadium communication — including for teams — whenever the president moves around, citing Trump’s visit to last season’s national championship game between Indiana and Miami. Cignetti corrected the narrative by pointing out the temporary loss of communication occurred during Miami’s second-to-last offensive series, which ended in a 22-yard touchdown pass from Carson Beck to Malachi Toney to pull the ‘Canes within 24-21 with 6 1/2 minutes left in regulation. “There’s something spreading like wildfire on social media, right, that when the president leaves that communication devices go out, the headsets. That’s a fact, that happens,” Cignetti said Thursday night, via the Kirkwood & Dunn podcast. “And when President Trump left the (national championship) around the seven-minute mark of the fourth quarter, there were two or three plays – we were on defense – where we couldn’t hear at all. And the second play was when they gave the ball
READ UPDATE →STATTAKEIs Indiana Already Better Than Last Year’s National Champion?
The opponents have not been strong enough to settle the argument. The Hoosiers’ balance, quarterback efficiency and defensive control are strong enough to make it a real one.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEIndiana football gets major NCAA eligibility ruling for two key defenders.
Indiana football gets major NCAA eligibility ruling for two key defenders. Stephen Daley and Kellan Wyatt are eligible again after a favorable court ruling in Indiana's ongoing NCAA case.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATE2026 Big Ten Title Odds: Ohio State leads Polymarket odds after Week 3 of season.
A new Polymarket prediction market lists nine Big Ten football teams with 3% or greater odds to win the Big Ten Championship this season. Ryan Day ‘s Ohio State Buckeyes , which haven’t won a Big Ten title since 2020, are currently trending as an early season favorite with 36% odds as of 11:30 pm ET on Sept. 23 . They sit just ahead of Indiana (25%) and Oregon (12%). Penn State and USC also currently sit at or above 6% odds. Key points from the original article: • Ohio State Buckeyes – 36% • Indiana Hoosiers – 25% • Oregon Ducks – 12% • T4. Penn State Nittany Lions – 6% • T4. USC Trojans – 6% • T6. Michigan Wolverines – 4% • T6. UCLA Bruins – 4% • T8. Iowa Hawkeyes – 3% • T8. Northwestern Wildcats – 3% • Teams 10-18
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEBig Ten Football Power Poll: Week Three.
Big Ten Football Power Poll: Week Three. A week as expected in Week 3 leads to one that should answer many questions in Week 4 Week three pretty much went as expected. The Big Ten was favorited big in a majority of the non-conference games, and they won those games. Key points from the original article: 1. Indiana Hoosiers 3-0 (1) 2. Ohio State Buckeyes 2-1 (3) 3. USC Trojans 4-0 (2) 4. Penn State Nittany Lions 3-0 (4) 5. Michigan Wolverines (3-0) (5) 6. Oregon Ducks 2-1 (8) 7. Iowa Hawkeyes 3-0 (7) 8. Washington Huskies 3-0 (6) 9. Nebraska Cornhuskers 3-0 (9) 10. UCLA Bruins 3-0 (10) 11. Minnesota Golden Gophers 2-1 (11) 12. Northwestern Wildcats 2-0 (13) 13. Illinois Fighting Illini 2-1 (12) 14. Wisconsin Badgers 2-1 (14) 15. Michigan State Spartans 2-1 (15) 16. Maryland Terrapins 2-1 (16) 17. Purdue Boilermakers 1-2 (17) 18. Rutgers Scarlet Knights 0-3 (18)
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATE5 key takeaways from Big Ten football after Week 3.
5 key takeaways from Big Ten football after Week 3. After Week 3 the Big Ten does not have a clear consensus on who will win the conference, just many potential contenders in a cluttered race Each week continues to be filled with new and intriguing storylines in the Big Ten. The Big Ten is as deep and competitive as it's ever been. Key points from the original article: 1. Oregon's offense is still elite 2. Penn State will be a problem this season 3. The Big Ten is deeper than just top two teams 4. Indiana should be ranked higher 5. UCLA is a huge dark horse in this conference
READ UPDATE →FEATURED ANALYSISSeven Teams Have 11-1 Title Odds. Only Three Were Top-12 on Both Sides.
The betting market sees a seven-team championship tier. StatTake’s 2025 efficiency data draws a sharper line around Ohio State, Oregon and Indiana—and exposes the different bets being made on Texas, Notre Dame, Georgia and Miami.
READ UPDATE →ROSTER BUILDING
RECRUITING HUB →Recruiting & development
Recruiting to production
See how efficiently signed talent develops into starts, impact and wins.
What transfers added
Separate returning development from incoming and outgoing portal value.
PROGRAM CONTEXT
TEAM TRENDS →History & trends
Wins, efficiency and schedule strength in one timeline.
Home, road, favorite and underdog performance.
Recent form versus the long-term series story.
Drafted players by position and development path.
Illinois
Iowa
Maryland
Michigan State