Akron
Purdue
Miami
Louisville
Stanford
NC State
California
Virginia
SMU
Georgia Tech
DukeFour-year talent direction
Track class strength, position balance and roster needs across signing cycles.
STATTAKE DATABASEFIND ANY TEAM OR PLAYER
ACC • FBS TEAM DATABASE
Wake Forest
Complete schedules, team production, player statistics, news, analytics, recruiting and program history in one fan destination.
2026 SEASON DATABASE
Wake Forest football
Record: 8–1 (Schedule & Results)
Conference: ACC
Players: 73
Points For: 390
Points/Game: 43.3
Points Against: 143
Opp. Points/Game: 15.9
2026 SEASON
LIVE SCOREBOARD →Schedule & results
OFFICIAL SCHEDULE FEEDOpponent names and logos open team pages. Dates and results open StatTake box scores.
WEEKOPPONENTLOCATIONGAME
WEEK 8BYE——
TEAM PRODUCTION
Team stats
Season totals organized for quick comparison. Swipe horizontally for more.
2026 SEASON TOTALS
ALL GAMESOffense at a glance
| PASS CMP | PASS ATT | PASS YDS | PASS % | PASS AVG | PASS TD | PASS INT | PASS RTG | SACK | RUSH ATT | RUSH YDS | RUSH AVG | RUSH TD | REC | REC YDS | REC AVG | REC TD | PTS/G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 186 | 270 | 2,807 | 68.9 | 10.4 | 22 | 1 | 182.4 | 0 | 313 | 1,592 | 5.1 | 26 | 186 | 2,807 | 15.1 | 22 | 43.3 |
TEAM ANALYTICS CENTER
OPEN NATIONAL ANALYTICS →Wake Forest analytics
LOADING 2026 EPA METRICS
The verified team snapshot is loading now.
2026 COMPLETE TEAM ROSTER
PLAYER PROFILES →Individual player statistics
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Passing
| PLAYER | CMP | ATT | YDS | CMP% | AVG | TD | INT | RTG | SACK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G. LopezQB | 153 | 228 | 2176 | 67.1 | 9.5 | 18 | 1 | 172.4 | — |
| S. PizzellaQB | 29 | 37 | 517 | 78.4 | 14.0 | 3 | 0 | 222.5 | — |
| G. JonesQB | 2 | 3 | 89 | 66.7 | 29.7 | 1 | 0 | 425.9 | — |
| G. LawlessQB | 2 | 2 | 25 | 100.0 | 12.5 | 0 | 0 | 205.0 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 186 | 270 | 2,807 | 68.9 | 10.4 | 22 | 1 | 182.4 | 0 |
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Rushing
| PLAYER | CAR | YDS | AVG | LNG | TD | FUM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T. Clark IIIRB | 86 | 416 | 4.8 | 57 | 8 | — |
| D. LawrenceRB | 69 | 327 | 4.7 | 21 | 3 | — |
| G. LopezQB | 76 | 318 | 4.2 | 24 | 6 | — |
| J. SearcyRB | 28 | 207 | 7.4 | 55 | 4 | — |
| S. PizzellaQB | 19 | 115 | 6.1 | 19 | 2 | — |
| K. McCalebRB | 7 | 81 | 11.6 | 39 | 1 | — |
| D. DickmannWR | 4 | 66 | 16.5 | 44 | 1 | — |
| K. DanielsRB | 17 | 49 | 2.9 | 7 | 0 | — |
| R. HenleyRB | 3 | 14 | 4.7 | 7 | 1 | — |
| G. JonesQB | 2 | 7 | 3.5 | 11 | 0 | — |
| G. LawlessQB | 1 | 4 | 4.0 | 4 | 0 | — |
| J. FoleyWR | 1 | -12 | -12.0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 313 | 1,592 | 5.1 | 57 | 26 | 0 |
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Receiving
| PLAYER | REC | YDS | AVG | LNG | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. HernandezWR | 61 | 945 | 15.5 | 78 | 7 |
| J. FoleyWR | 28 | 557 | 19.9 | 73 | 4 |
| K. ShanksWR | 21 | 311 | 14.8 | 40 | 2 |
| A. MeeksWR | 16 | 267 | 16.7 | 72 | 1 |
| D. DickmannWR | 13 | 206 | 15.8 | 87 | 1 |
| D. BarryTE | 7 | 121 | 17.3 | 39 | 3 |
| D. GoldstonWR | 2 | 65 | 32.5 | 51 | 0 |
| K. JohnsonTE | 9 | 64 | 7.1 | 17 | 1 |
| D. LawrenceRB | 9 | 57 | 6.3 | 14 | 0 |
| J. SearcyRB | 2 | 55 | 27.5 | 36 | 0 |
| B. KaniaWR | 4 | 53 | 13.3 | 24 | 1 |
| W. LoerzelTE | 5 | 40 | 8.0 | 15 | 1 |
| T. Clark IIIRB | 2 | 16 | 8.0 | 13 | 0 |
| W. BrysonWR | 2 | 15 | 7.5 | 9 | 0 |
| L. MorrisTE | 1 | 13 | 13.0 | 13 | 0 |
| K. McCalebRB | 1 | 11 | 11.0 | 11 | 0 |
| H. O'BrienWR | 1 | 6 | 6.0 | 6 | 0 |
| S. PizzellaQB | 1 | 4 | 4.0 | 4 | 0 |
| M. LusardiTE | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 |
| TEAM TOTALS | 186 | 2,807 | 15.1 | 87 | 22 |
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Defense
| PLAYER | TOT | SOLO | AST | TFL | SACK | INT | PD | FF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V. FirenzeLB | 55 | 21 | — | 4 | 1 | — | 3 | — |
| B. JohnsonDB | 50 | 29 | — | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | — |
| F. CusanoLB | 50 | 17 | — | 2.0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| A. HallLB | 48 | 13 | — | 3.0 | 0 | — | 2 | — |
| D. PattersonDB | 44 | 19 | — | 0.5 | 0 | — | 2 | — |
| L. HardyDL | 44 | 16 | — | 11.5 | 5.5 | — | 0 | — |
| D. Blades IIDB | 33 | 21 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 4 | — |
| R. TongueDB | 31 | 19 | — | 0.5 | 0 | 1 | 2 | — |
| A. WilliamsDB | 30 | 18 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| Z. LohavichanDL | 28 | 8 | — | 7.5 | 2.5 | — | 0 | — |
| G. KirschkeDL | 27 | 13 | — | 8.0 | 4 | — | 1 | — |
| M. TurpinDB | 27 | 10 | — | 1.5 | 0 | — | 2 | — |
| S. EaddyDB | 21 | 14 | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | — |
| D. AfalavaDL | 18 | 6 | — | 3.0 | 2.0 | 1 | 1 | — |
| M. HerronDL | 15 | 3 | — | 2.0 | 1.0 | — | 0 | — |
| M. PartinLB | 15 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| D. DyceLB | 14 | 5 | — | 0.5 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| M. BrightDB | 13 | 7 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| W. WhaleyLB | 12 | 6 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| B. JockLB | 11 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| T. WestDB | 10 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| F. GillensDB | 9 | 8 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — |
| K. LeeDL | 9 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| T. WaltonDL | 9 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| K. DembeleDL | 8 | 4 | — | 4.0 | 2.0 | — | 0 | — |
| C. HardyDL | 7 | 2 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — |
| Z. StevensonDB | 6 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| B. SmileyDL | 4 | 0 | — | 0.5 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. PattersonDB | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — |
| J. PrattDL | 4 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. BlackwellLB | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| K. BartleyDB | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| L. Smalls-AllenDL | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| R. HarringtonDL | 3 | 1 | — | 0.5 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| Z. JacksonWR | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| C. HollesDL | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| D. JohnsonDL | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — |
| J. LowenbergLB | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| M. SibyDB | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| M. AhouaDB | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| S. MitchellDL | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| C. HarrisDL | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| D. CookDB | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. KennedyOL | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| K. TownesDB | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| K. DanielsRB | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| K. McCalebRB | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| S. GarciaDB | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| K. ShanksWR | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 690 | 300 | 0 | 59 | 21 | 5 | 29 | 0 |
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Kicking & Scoring
| PLAYER | FGM | FGA | FG% | XPM | XPA | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. CalvertPK | 13 | 14 | — | 43 | 43 | 82 |
| TEAM TOTALS | 13 | 14 | 92.9 | 43 | 43 | 82 |
TEAM NEWS + STATTAKE ARTICLES
ALL CFB NEWS →Latest Wake Forest coverage
NATIONAL UPDATE
Wake Forest Hammers Merrimack, 77-0.
Wake Forest Hammers Merrimack, 77-0. The best thing you can say about the Wake Forest game against Merrimack is that it’s over, with the win, and no significant injuries. The Demon Deacons, without their starting quarterback, slapped Merrimack around in a game that was over at halftime. Wake beat Merrimack 77-0.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEWake Forest’s Heisman hopeful QB Gio Lopez ruled out for Week 10 clash.
Wake Forest’s Heisman hopeful QB Gio Lopez ruled out for Week 10 clash. The Wake Forest football team hopes to win the ACC this season. The Demon Deacons are making a big move on Saturday, ahead of a non conference game against Merrimack. The squad is making a change at the quarterback position.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEJake Dickert’s Stand at Wake Forest.
Jake Dickert’s Stand at Wake Forest. Jake Dickert’s name probably comes up more than he would prefer these days. He will tell you that he gets too much credit for his Wake Forest team being 7-1 and in contention for the ACC Championship game. His name also gets mentioned with every college football head coach job opening.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEPredicting the first round of College Football Playoff rankings.
This year, they are in an eerily similar situation. A loss, and Notre Dame has no quality wins as Finebaum sees it. $19.99 gets you a FULL year of On3 | Rivals national coverage “It’s the marquee game of the week, which is saying a great deal, by the way. I mean, I’ve already said it, and a lot of people have already said that they’ll be left out (if they lose). But that may be more difficult because of the absolute carnage. But it will be a healthy debate, though. It won’t be as clear cut as last year, but I would argue that they have no business being in the playoffs if you can’t win at least one important game.”
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEWake Forest: ESPN updates FPI rankings for every ACC football team after Week 8.
ESPN has updated its FPI metrics following Week 8 of the college football season and there's a new pecking order in the Big 12. Week 8 of the college football season is in the books, and while it didn't have quite as many massive upsets as Week 7, it still had plenty. After all of the action, ESPN has updated its FPI rankings for every Big 12 team. There was plenty of movement, courtesy of a handful of losses by top teams, including BYU and Texas Tech . Key points from the original article: 1. Utah Utes 2. Texas Tech Red Raiders 3. BYU Cougars 4. Houston Cougars 5. Arizona Wildcats 6. Oklahoma State Cowboys 7. Baylor Bears 8. TCU Horned Frogs 9. UCF Knights 10. Cincinnati Bearcats 11. Kansas State Wildcats 12. Kansas Jayhawks 13. West Virginia Mountaineers 14. Iowa State Cyclones 15. Arizona State Sun Devils 16. Colorado Buffaloes
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEHow Jake Dickert built a top-20 team at Wake Forest with one of the Power Four's s…
Wake Forest head coach Jake Dickert details his blueprint for winning with one of college football's smallest Power Four budgets. Jake Dickert knows he is not going to win bidding wars in the transfer portal at Wake Forest.
READ UPDATE →FEATURED STATTAKEMiami’s 24 Straight Completions Are Hiding the Better Stat
Darian Mensah’s ACC-record start was brilliant. Miami’s 136-yard rushing advantage revealed the part of this team that can survive when the quarterback is merely human.
READ UPDATE →ROSTER BUILDING
RECRUITING HUB →Recruiting & development
Recruiting to production
See how efficiently signed talent develops into starts, impact and wins.
What transfers added
Separate returning development from incoming and outgoing portal value.
PROGRAM CONTEXT
TEAM TRENDS →History & trends
Wins, efficiency and schedule strength in one timeline.
Home, road, favorite and underdog performance.
Recent form versus the long-term series story.
Drafted players by position and development path.
Boston College
Clemson
Florida State