Fresno State
Stanford
BYU
Utah
Washington
Notre Dame
Arizona
Colorado
Oregon
Arizona State
California
UCLA
IowaFour-year talent direction
Track class strength, position balance and roster needs across signing cycles.
STATTAKE DATABASEFIND ANY TEAM OR PLAYER
Big Ten • FBS TEAM DATABASE
USC
Complete schedules, team production, player statistics, news, analytics, recruiting and program history in one fan destination.
2019 SEASON DATABASE
USC football
Record: 8–5 (Schedule & Results)
Conference: Big Ten
Players: 62
Points For: 422
Points/Game: 32.5
Points Against: 382
Opp. Points/Game: 29.4
2019 SEASON
LIVE SCOREBOARD →Schedule & results
OFFICIAL SCHEDULE FEEDOpponent names and logos open team pages. Dates and results open StatTake box scores.
WEEKOPPONENTLOCATIONGAME
WEEK 5BYE——
WEEK 7BYE——
WEEK 9BYE——
WEEK 11BYE——
POSTSEASONBOWL & PLAYOFF GAMES
TEAM PRODUCTION
Team stats
Season totals organized for quick comparison. Swipe horizontally for more.
2019 SEASON TOTALS
ALL GAMESOffense at a glance
| PASS CMP | PASS ATT | PASS YDS | PASS % | PASS AVG | PASS TD | PASS INT | PASS RTG | SACK | RUSH ATT | RUSH YDS | RUSH AVG | RUSH TD | REC | REC YDS | REC AVG | REC TD | PTS/G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 365 | 514 | 4,365 | 71.0 | 8.5 | 35 | 15 | 159.0 | 0 | 375 | 1,617 | 4.3 | 18 | 365 | 4,365 | 12.0 | 35 | 32.5 |
TEAM ANALYTICS CENTER
OPEN NATIONAL ANALYTICS →USC analytics
LOADING 2019 EPA METRICS
The verified team snapshot is loading now.
2019 COMPLETE TEAM ROSTER
PLAYER PROFILES →Individual player statistics
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Passing
| PLAYER | CMP | ATT | YDS | CMP% | AVG | TD | INT | RTG | SACK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K. SlovisQB | 282 | 392 | 3502 | 71.9 | 8.9 | 30 | 9 | 167.6 | — |
| M. FinkQB | 58 | 88 | 648 | 65.9 | 7.4 | 4 | 5 | 131.4 | — |
| J. DanielsQB | 25 | 34 | 215 | 73.5 | 6.3 | 1 | 1 | 130.5 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 365 | 514 | 4,365 | 71.0 | 8.5 | 35 | 15 | 159.0 | 0 |
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Rushing
| PLAYER | CAR | YDS | AVG | LNG | TD | FUM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V. MalepeaiRB | 105 | 503 | 4.8 | 26 | 6 | — |
| S. CarrRB | 72 | 396 | 5.5 | 60 | 5 | — |
| K. Christon IIRB | 68 | 373 | 5.5 | 55 | 2 | — |
| M. SteppRB | 48 | 307 | 6.4 | 35 | 3 | — |
| A. St. BrownWR | 7 | 60 | 8.6 | 37 | 1 | — |
| Q. JounttiRB | 13 | 38 | 2.9 | 6 | 0 | — |
| D. DavisCB | 2 | 15 | 7.5 | 11 | 0 | — |
| J. DanielsQB | 3 | -6 | -2.0 | 5 | 0 | — |
| M. FinkQB | 12 | -12 | -1.0 | 8 | 1 | — |
| K. SlovisQB | 45 | -57 | -1.3 | 9 | 0 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 375 | 1,617 | 4.3 | 60 | 18 | 0 |
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Receiving
| PLAYER | REC | YDS | AVG | LNG | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M. Pittman Jr.WR | 101 | 1275 | 12.6 | 77 | 11 |
| A. St. BrownWR | 77 | 1042 | 13.5 | 95 | 6 |
| T. VaughnsWR | 74 | 912 | 12.3 | 49 | 6 |
| D. LondonWR | 39 | 567 | 14.5 | 46 | 5 |
| S. CarrRB | 22 | 143 | 6.5 | 21 | 1 |
| K. Christon IIRB | 11 | 126 | 11.5 | 58 | 3 |
| E. KrommenhoekTE | 11 | 122 | 11.1 | 60 | 0 |
| V. MalepeaiRB | 15 | 70 | 4.7 | 16 | 1 |
| V. Jones Jr.WR | 6 | 35 | 5.8 | 8 | 0 |
| J. FaloTE | 4 | 23 | 5.8 | 12 | 1 |
| K. FordWR | 1 | 20 | 20.0 | 20 | 1 |
| M. McClainWR | 3 | 19 | 6.3 | 9 | 0 |
| D. WilliamsWR | 1 | 11 | 11.0 | 11 | 0 |
| TEAM TOTALS | 365 | 4,365 | 12.0 | 95 | 35 |
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Defense
| PLAYER | TOT | SOLO | AST | TFL | SACK | INT | PD | FF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J. Houston Jr.LB | 104 | 64 | — | 7.0 | 2.5 | — | 3 | — |
| T. HufangaS | 90 | 58 | — | 7.5 | 3.5 | — | 3 | — |
| I. Pola-MaoS | 73 | 45 | — | 5.5 | 1.5 | 4 | 2 | — |
| K. MaugaLB | 59 | 30 | — | 7.0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | — |
| P. Gaoteote IVLB | 58 | 30 | — | 3.0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| D. JacksonLB | 46 | 26 | — | 11.5 | 5.5 | — | 3 | — |
| M. TuipulotuDL | 46 | 23 | — | 6.0 | 2.0 | — | 3 | — |
| J. TufeleDL | 41 | 21 | — | 5.5 | 3.5 | — | 1 | — |
| O. GriffinCB | 37 | 24 | — | 0.5 | 0 | — | 9 | — |
| I. Taylor-StuartCB | 36 | 27 | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | — |
| C. SteeleCB | 35 | 25 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 5 | — |
| G. JohnsonS | 35 | 27 | — | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4 | — |
| C. WilliamsDB | 29 | 20 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| C. RectorDL | 19 | 10 | — | 2.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | — |
| B. PiliDL | 18 | 10 | — | 5.0 | 1.5 | — | 3 | — |
| C. TremblayDL | 16 | 10 | — | 3.0 | 2.0 | — | 0 | — |
| C. PollardS | 15 | 10 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. FalanikoLB | 12 | 6 | — | 1.5 | 0.5 | — | 0 | — |
| D. HewettCB | 10 | 8 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| N. FigueroaDL | 10 | 5 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | — |
| H. EcholsDL | 9 | 5 | — | 1.5 | 1.5 | — | 1 | — |
| E. WinstonLB | 8 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| B. AllenDB | 6 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. WilliamsDB | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. McMillanS | 6 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| K. MakaulaDB | 6 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — |
| M. WilliamsS | 6 | 5 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | — |
| Q. JounttiRB | 6 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| R. GoforthLB | 6 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| A. StadthausPK | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| C. MurphyDL | 4 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — |
| D. BentonDL | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| M. Pittman Jr.WR | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| T. VaughnsWR | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| V. Jones Jr.WR | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| A. McClainLB | 2 | 2 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — |
| B. NeilonOL | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| D. JohnsonLS | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| M. TufonoDL | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| A. OteyDB | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| C. LockeWR | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. McKenzieOL | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. FaloTE | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| M. BrownPK | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| R. ScottLB | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| S. GilbertLB | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 883 | 535 | 0 | 80 | 35 | 9 | 49 | 0 |
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Kicking & Scoring
| PLAYER | FGM | FGA | FG% | XPM | XPA | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. McGrathPK | 14 | 17 | — | 54 | 54 | 96 |
| TEAM TOTALS | 14 | 17 | 82.4 | 54 | 54 | 96 |
TEAM NEWS + STATTAKE ARTICLES
ALL CFB NEWS →Latest USC coverage
NATIONAL UPDATE
College football odds, lines, schedule for Week 11: LSU, Indiana open as favorites…
College football odds, lines, schedule for Week 11: LSU, Indiana open as favorites in key conference battles. Indiana hosts USC in a pivotal Big Ten clash while Georgia, LSU and unbeaten Utah navigate tricky conference tests as the playoff race heats up Week 11 of the college football season doesn't carry the same curb appeal as Week 10 in terms of ranked vs. ranked matchups. But it is nonetheless littered with challenging games for College Football Playoff hopefuls and national championship contenders. Key points from the original article: • The big games • Best of the rest
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEUSC: Top 10 games for Week 11 of the college football season.
USC-Indiana, LSU-Texas and Wake Forest-SMU highlight the top 10 games of Week 11 of the college football season. There are only three weeks left in the college football regular season, and there are a lot of important games still to be played. Week 11 includes four top 25 games, according to the AP Poll rankings. It’s a big week in the ACC, and there are potential upsets in the other major conferences. Key points from the original article: 1. USC at Indiana 2. Texas at LSU 3. Wake Forest at SMU 4. Utah at Arizona 5. Missouri at Georgia 6. Texas Tech at Oklahoma State 7. Duke at Miami 8. Northwestern at Ohio State 9. Illinois at UCLA 10. Baylor at BYU
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATE‘Red Flags Going All Over There’ — Joel Klatt Calls Out CFP Committee’s Explanatio…
‘Red Flags Going All Over There’ — Joel Klatt Calls Out CFP Committee’s Explanation for Ohio State’s Surprise Ranking. The Ohio State Buckeyes have suffered a triple whammy in the past few weeks after quarterback Julian Sayin was ruled out indefinitely with a right throwing arm injury, a Week 9 loss to the USC Trojans, and a lowly College Football Playoff ranking. The Buckeyes were ranked No.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEOhio State: 2026 Heisman Poll Week Nine.
2026 Heisman Poll Week Nine. Welcome to the 2026 Heisman Poll Week Nine. Our top five have stayed the same for the last two rounds of voting; only the order keeps changing. Jeremiah Smith was literally running away with it until Ohio State struggled without Julian Sayin against USC.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEBig Ten Power Rankings, Week 10: Can Lincoln Riley lead USC on a late charge?.
Big Ten Power Rankings, Week 10: Can Lincoln Riley lead USC on a late charge?. After knocking off No. 1 Ohio State, the Trojans suddenly have life in the Big Ten and College Football Playoff races After losing to Wisconsin , many wondered if this might be the end of the Lincoln Riley era at USC . A treacherous closing stretch of the season against three top 10 opponents created a reality where the Trojans could finish the year 7-5, which would almost certainly have spelled doom for Riley. Key points from the original article: 1. UCLA 2. Indiana 3. USC 4. Ohio State 5. Iowa 6. Northwestern 7. Minnesota 8. Wisconsin 9. Illinois 10. Oregon 11. Washington 12. Nebraska 13. Michigan 14. Penn State 15. Purdue 16. Rutgers 17. Michigan State 18. Maryland
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEQuarterback play in Big Ten continues to make or break top teams.
Penn State’s Audavion Collins proves he’s one of the best in the Big Ten [opinion]. Audavion Collins has come a long way since growing up in Newton, Georgia (pop. 602), and being the seventh defensive back recruited by Mississippi State in 2022. Most of the Southeastern Conference powers ignored him, perhaps because his statistics weren’t glittering or maybe because he was rated a three-star recruit.
READ UPDATE →STATTAKEWhy Is 4–0 UCLA Still Ranked Behind USC?
USC has the better brand and the better loss. UCLA has two Power Four road wins, a 2–0 Big Ten record and the weekend’s most complete performance.
READ UPDATE →STATTAKEOregon’s Backup Quarterback Made Its Biggest Win More Convincing
Losing Dante Moore should have narrowed Oregon’s options. Dylan Raiola entered and showed why the Ducks’ ceiling is bigger than one quarterback.
READ UPDATE →ROSTER BUILDING
RECRUITING HUB →Recruiting & development
Recruiting to production
See how efficiently signed talent develops into starts, impact and wins.
What transfers added
Separate returning development from incoming and outgoing portal value.
PROGRAM CONTEXT
TEAM TRENDS →History & trends
Wins, efficiency and schedule strength in one timeline.
Home, road, favorite and underdog performance.
Recent form versus the long-term series story.
Drafted players by position and development path.
Illinois
Indiana
Maryland
Michigan
Michigan State