Utah
UNLV
New Mexico
Northwestern
Penn State
Michigan State
Maryland
Indiana
Nebraska
Ohio State
Washington
USCFour-year talent direction
Track class strength, position balance and roster needs across signing cycles.
STATTAKE DATABASEFIND ANY TEAM OR PLAYER
Big Ten • FBS TEAM DATABASE
UCLA
Complete schedules, team production, player statistics, news, analytics, recruiting and program history in one fan destination.
2025 SEASON DATABASE
UCLA football
Record: 3–9 (Schedule & Results)
Conference: Big Ten
Players: 54
Points For: 218
Points/Game: 18.2
Points Against: 401
Opp. Points/Game: 33.4
2025 SEASON
LIVE SCOREBOARD →Schedule & results
OFFICIAL SCHEDULE FEEDOpponent names and logos open team pages. Dates and results open StatTake box scores.
WEEKOPPONENTLOCATIONGAME
WEEK 3BYE——
WEEK 9BYE——
TEAM PRODUCTION
Team stats
Season totals organized for quick comparison. Swipe horizontally for more.
2025 SEASON TOTALS
ALL GAMESOffense at a glance
| PASS CMP | PASS ATT | PASS YDS | PASS % | PASS AVG | PASS TD | PASS INT | PASS RTG | SACK | RUSH ATT | RUSH YDS | RUSH AVG | RUSH TD | REC | REC YDS | REC AVG | REC TD | PTS/G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 229 | 358 | 2,163 | 64.0 | 6.0 | 15 | 7 | 124.6 | 0 | 374 | 1,686 | 4.5 | 8 | 229 | 2,163 | 9.4 | 15 | 18.2 |
TEAM ANALYTICS CENTER
OPEN NATIONAL ANALYTICS →UCLA analytics
LOADING 2025 EPA METRICS
The verified team snapshot is loading now.
2025 COMPLETE TEAM ROSTER
PLAYER PROFILES →Individual player statistics
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Passing
| PLAYER | CMP | ATT | YDS | CMP% | AVG | TD | INT | RTG | SACK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N. IamaleavaQB | 208 | 323 | 1928 | 64.4 | 6.0 | 13 | 7 | 123.5 | — |
| L. DuncanQB | 21 | 34 | 235 | 61.8 | 6.9 | 2 | 0 | 139.2 | — |
| M. MatthewsWR | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 229 | 358 | 2,163 | 64.0 | 6.0 | 15 | 7 | 124.6 | 0 |
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Rushing
| PLAYER | CAR | YDS | AVG | LNG | TD | FUM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N. IamaleavaQB | 112 | 505 | 4.5 | 52 | 4 | — |
| J. BergerRB | 81 | 364 | 4.5 | 24 | 2 | — |
| J. ThomasRB | 82 | 306 | 3.7 | 32 | 1 | — |
| A. WoodsRB | 63 | 294 | 4.7 | 33 | 0 | — |
| A. Frias IIRB | 24 | 183 | 7.6 | 55 | 1 | — |
| T. LeigberRB | 4 | 24 | 6.0 | 15 | 0 | — |
| C. MartinDB | 1 | 20 | 20.0 | 20 | 0 | — |
| K. CoxRB | 2 | 8 | 4.0 | 5 | 0 | — |
| J. BusicDL | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 2 | 0 | — |
| M. MatthewsWR | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | — |
| I. CarlsonRB | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| W. KarollP | 1 | -8 | -8.0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| C. PetermanPK | 1 | -13 | -13.0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 374 | 1,686 | 4.5 | 55 | 8 | 0 |
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Receiving
| PLAYER | REC | YDS | AVG | LNG | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K. GilmerWR | 50 | 535 | 10.7 | 43 | 4 |
| M. MatthewsWR | 33 | 348 | 10.5 | 37 | 2 |
| T. Mokiao-AtimalalaWR | 25 | 322 | 12.9 | 34 | 3 |
| R. Flores Jr.WR | 26 | 274 | 10.5 | 51 | 0 |
| A. WoodsRB | 24 | 211 | 8.8 | 45 | 2 |
| H. HabermehlTE | 20 | 138 | 6.9 | 26 | 0 |
| A. Frias IIRB | 13 | 78 | 6.0 | 22 | 1 |
| J. PedersenTE | 11 | 72 | 6.5 | 15 | 0 |
| J. BergerRB | 10 | 70 | 7.0 | 15 | 2 |
| J. ThomasRB | 10 | 64 | 6.4 | 12 | 0 |
| J. WilsonWR | 2 | 20 | 10.0 | 11 | 0 |
| E. StaplesWR | 2 | 18 | 9.0 | 12 | 0 |
| K. MillerWR | 2 | 9 | 4.5 | 5 | 0 |
| N. Fox-FloresTE | 1 | 4 | 4.0 | 4 | 1 |
| TEAM TOTALS | 229 | 2,163 | 9.4 | 51 | 15 |
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Defense
| PLAYER | TOT | SOLO | AST | TFL | SACK | INT | PD | FF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J. VaughnsLB | 107 | 46 | — | 6.0 | 1 | — | 1 | — |
| I. ChisomLB | 84 | 40 | — | 2.5 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| K. LawrenceDB | 70 | 44 | — | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — |
| C. MartinDB | 65 | 31 | — | 3.5 | 0 | 1 | 3 | — |
| J. WoodsLB | 47 | 28 | — | 4.5 | 1.5 | — | 3 | — |
| S. JacksonDB | 44 | 31 | — | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | — |
| G. Smith IIIDL | 40 | 19 | — | 1.5 | 0.5 | — | 0 | — |
| K. WilliamsDT | 39 | 17 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| R. PleasantDB | 36 | 22 | — | 1.5 | 0 | — | 7 | — |
| K. ClarkDB | 23 | 16 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 2 | — |
| K. BennettDL | 23 | 11 | — | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | — |
| A. Jones Jr.DL | 20 | 10 | — | 2.5 | 1.5 | — | 1 | — |
| A. Jordan Jr.CB | 19 | 12 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 10 | — |
| D. PellotLB | 19 | 11 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. BusicDL | 18 | 12 | — | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | — |
| R. Stafford IIIDB | 16 | 10 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — |
| D. AupiuDL | 15 | 11 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | — |
| S. TaupakiDT | 15 | 8 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — |
| A. FuimaonoDL | 14 | 3 | — | 1.0 | 0.5 | — | 1 | — |
| S. TaylorLB | 12 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| A. WilliamsDB | 10 | 7 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. BenjaminCB | 9 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| B. ThreatsDB | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| C. CogshellDL | 4 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — |
| T. LeeDB | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| W. MosierLB | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. HargroveDL | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. WallsLB | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| M. SullivanDL | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| C. ShawWR | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| C. StewartDB | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| E. StaplesWR | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| H. HabermehlTE | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| K. GilmerWR | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| R. Flores Jr.WR | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| W. KarollP | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 780 | 418 | 0 | 40 | 10 | 4 | 37 | 0 |
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Kicking & Scoring
| PLAYER | FGM | FGA | FG% | XPM | XPA | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M. BhaghaniPK | 16 | 20 | — | 22 | 22 | 70 |
| TEAM TOTALS | 16 | 20 | 80.0 | 22 | 22 | 70 |
TEAM NEWS + STATTAKE ARTICLES
ALL CFB NEWS →Latest UCLA coverage
NATIONAL UPDATE
UCLA continues CFP push with win over Minnesota, rise to No.
UCLA continues CFP push with win over Minnesota, rise to No. 4 in Coaches Poll. UCLA ran away with the game again in the fourth quarter and moves up one spot in the Coaches Poll. Will the CFP committee take notice?
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEJoel Klatt wonders how much football CFP committee has ‘watched’ before ranking UCLA.
Joel Klatt wonders how much football CFP committee has ‘watched’ before ranking UCLA. The College Football Playoff selection committee put the UCLA Bruins at No. 8 in its first rankings on Tuesday, behind the two-loss Alabama Crimson Tide and Texas Longhorns. UCLA spent Saturday afternoon in Minneapolis giving the committee a reason to look again, beating the Minnesota Golden Gophers 34-20 to reach 9-0 for the first time […] The post Joel Klatt wonders how much football CFP committee has ‘watched’ before ranking UCLA appeared first on Gridiron Heroics.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEUCLA football moves up to No.
UCLA football moves up to No. 4 in this week's US LBM Coaches Poll. The UCLA Bruins moved to 9-0 on the season on Saturday and on Sunday they moved to No. 4 in US LBM Coaches Poll.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATE‘Joel (Klatt) Is Right,’ ‘Move Them Up’ — CFB Fans Throw Their Weight Behind FOX A…
‘Joel (Klatt) Is Right,’ ‘Move Them Up’ — CFB Fans Throw Their Weight Behind FOX Analyst’s Blunt Criticism of CFP Committee Over UCLA’s Ranking. UCLA had one kneel-down left in Minneapolis when Joel Klatt turned his attention to the College Football Playoff committee. The Bruins had just ripped off two 75-yard touchdowns in the fourth quarter, but Klatt wanted to know if anyone who put them eighth had been watching.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEUCLA vs.
UCLA vs. Minnesota Results in the Bruins Buoying Their Big Ten Challenge, Banging on the CFP Door. With yet another win, the UCLA Bruins are now one of just three teams (along with the Miami Hurricanes and Utah Utes) that remain undefeated in the 2026 season, improving to 9-0. Naturally, their path to the College Football Playoff is looking more real by the week, but what about their Week 11 opponent, the Minnesota Golden Gophers?
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEUCLA vs.
UCLA vs. Minnesota Prediction, Odds, Picks For College Football Week 10. Get the latest UCLA vs. Minnesota odds, prediction and pick for College Football Week 10, plus kickoff time, TV channel and streaming information.
READ UPDATE →STATTAKEWhy Is 4–0 UCLA Still Ranked Behind USC?
USC has the better brand and the better loss. UCLA has two Power Four road wins, a 2–0 Big Ten record and the weekend’s most complete performance.
READ UPDATE →ROSTER BUILDING
RECRUITING HUB →Recruiting & development
Recruiting to production
See how efficiently signed talent develops into starts, impact and wins.
What transfers added
Separate returning development from incoming and outgoing portal value.
PROGRAM CONTEXT
TEAM TRENDS →History & trends
Wins, efficiency and schedule strength in one timeline.
Home, road, favorite and underdog performance.
Recent form versus the long-term series story.
Drafted players by position and development path.
Illinois
Iowa
Michigan