Four-year talent direction
Track class strength, position balance and roster needs across signing cycles.

Complete schedules, team production, player statistics, news, analytics, recruiting and program history in one fan destination.
Record: 12–2 (Schedule & Results)
Conference: Big Ten
Players: 68
Points For: 619
Points/Game: 44.2
Points Against: 231
Opp. Points/Game: 16.5
Season totals organized for quick comparison. Swipe horizontally for more.
| PASS CMP | PASS ATT | PASS YDS | PASS % | PASS AVG | PASS TD | PASS INT | PASS RTG | SACK | RUSH ATT | RUSH YDS | RUSH AVG | RUSH TD | REC | REC YDS | REC AVG | REC TD | PTS/G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 397 | 513 | 4,857 | 77.4 | 9.5 | 49 | 4 | 186.9 | 0 | 423 | 2,626 | 6.2 | 33 | 397 | 4,857 | 12.2 | 49 | 44.2 |
The verified team snapshot is loading now.
| PLAYER | CMP | ATT | YDS | CMP% | AVG | TD | INT | RTG | SACK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B. NixQB | 364 | 470 | 4508 | 77.4 | 9.6 | 45 | 3 | 188.3 | — |
| T. ThompsonTE | 24 | 31 | 297 | 77.4 | 9.6 | 4 | 1 | 194.0 | — |
| A. NovosadQB | 9 | 11 | 52 | 81.8 | 4.7 | 0 | 0 | 121.5 | — |
| B. IrvingRB | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 397 | 513 | 4,857 | 77.4 | 9.5 | 49 | 4 | 186.9 | 0 |
| PLAYER | CAR | YDS | AVG | LNG | TD | FUM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B. IrvingRB | 186 | 1180 | 6.3 | 56 | 11 | — |
| J. JamesRB | 107 | 759 | 7.1 | 37 | 11 | — |
| B. NixQB | 54 | 234 | 4.3 | 44 | 6 | — |
| N. WhittingtonRB | 20 | 146 | 7.3 | 41 | 2 | — |
| J. LimarRB | 24 | 109 | 4.5 | 21 | 1 | — |
| D. DowdellRB | 17 | 90 | 5.3 | 13 | 1 | — |
| T. ThompsonTE | 8 | 48 | 6.0 | 13 | 0 | — |
| C. RogersDL | 1 | 18 | 18.0 | 18 | 0 | — |
| G. Bryant Jr.WR | 3 | 18 | 6.0 | 15 | 0 | — |
| K. SadiqTE | 1 | 12 | 12.0 | 12 | 0 | — |
| T. HoldenWR | 2 | 12 | 6.0 | 7 | 1 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 423 | 2,626 | 6.2 | 56 | 33 | 0 |
| PLAYER | REC | YDS | AVG | LNG | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T. FranklinWR | 81 | 1383 | 17.1 | 84 | 14 |
| T. JohnsonWR | 86 | 1182 | 13.7 | 77 | 10 |
| T. HoldenWR | 37 | 452 | 12.2 | 63 | 6 |
| G. Bryant Jr.WR | 30 | 442 | 14.7 | 71 | 4 |
| T. FergusonTE | 42 | 414 | 9.9 | 33 | 6 |
| B. IrvingRB | 56 | 413 | 7.4 | 42 | 2 |
| P. HerbertTE | 15 | 196 | 13.1 | 49 | 3 |
| J. JamesRB | 15 | 132 | 8.8 | 30 | 1 |
| N. WhittingtonRB | 10 | 84 | 8.4 | 31 | 0 |
| J. LimarRB | 7 | 61 | 8.7 | 18 | 0 |
| C. KellyTE | 5 | 37 | 7.4 | 19 | 2 |
| K. SadiqTE | 5 | 24 | 4.8 | 9 | 1 |
| D. AndersonWR | 4 | 21 | 5.3 | 16 | 0 |
| K. HutsonWR | 1 | 8 | 8.0 | 8 | 0 |
| J. DickeyWR | 1 | 7 | 7.0 | 7 | 0 |
| K. KasperWR | 2 | 1 | 0.5 | 5 | 0 |
| TEAM TOTALS | 397 | 4,857 | 12.2 | 84 | 49 |
| PLAYER | TOT | SOLO | AST | TFL | SACK | INT | PD | FF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E. WilliamsDB | 82 | 49 | — | 5.0 | 4.5 | — | 1 | — |
| J. BassaLB | 71 | 42 | — | 3.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — |
| T. JohnsonDB | 70 | 37 | — | 4.5 | 1 | 2 | 7 | — |
| S. Stephens IVDB | 56 | 33 | — | 2.0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | — |
| B. BoettcherLB | 37 | 15 | — | 2.5 | 1 | — | 0 | — |
| J. BurchDE | 34 | 13 | — | 7.5 | 3 | — | 1 | — |
| K. JacksonDB | 34 | 25 | — | 5 | 2 | 3 | 7 | — |
| J. JacobsLB | 32 | 18 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | — |
| J. HillLB | 31 | 13 | — | 5 | 2 | — | 2 | — |
| T. TuiotiLB | 29 | 19 | — | 4 | 2 | — | 1 | — |
| J. FlorenceCB | 27 | 21 | — | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | — |
| B. DorlusDE | 25 | 14 | — | 6.5 | 5 | — | 7 | — |
| D. ManningDB | 25 | 17 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | — |
| N. ReedDB | 25 | 18 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 7 | — |
| T. TaimaniDL | 22 | 8 | — | 1.5 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| C. RogersDL | 21 | 5 | — | 2.5 | 1.5 | — | 0 | — |
| C. MartinDB | 21 | 13 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — |
| K. Ware-HudsonDT | 21 | 9 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | — |
| M. FunaLB | 21 | 10 | — | 2.5 | 1 | — | 0 | — |
| C. SoelleLB | 19 | 8 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| E. WinstonDL | 19 | 5 | — | 0.5 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| M. UiagaleleiLB | 18 | 9 | — | 3 | 2 | — | 2 | — |
| P. AumavaeDT | 18 | 9 | — | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | — |
| D. JacksonLB | 17 | 5 | — | 1.5 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| T. BridgesDB | 16 | 7 | — | 0.5 | 0 | — | 2 | — |
| B. AddisonDB | 11 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — |
| J. ShipleyDL | 7 | 3 | — | 1.5 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| K. TerrellCB | 6 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| B. PurchaseDE | 5 | 4 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | — |
| J. MixonLB | 5 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — |
| R. PleasantDB | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| D. AustinS | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| L. BassoLS | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| T. GreenDL | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| A. WashingtonDL | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| B. RobertsDL | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| D. DavidS | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| J. MooreDL | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. Bowens IIIDL | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| A. PorterDL | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| G. Bryant Jr.WR | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. JamesRB | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| K. SadiqTE | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| M. VidackovicDB | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| M. GardnerDL | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| R. JamesP | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| T. HoldenWR | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| Z. GrishamDB | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| T. TurnerS | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 857 | 453 | 0 | 71 | 34 | 12 | 58 | 0 |
| PLAYER | FGM | FGA | FG% | XPM | XPA | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. LewisPK | 12 | 18 | — | 70 | 70 | 106 |
| G. MeadorsPK | 0 | 0 | — | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| TEAM TOTALS | 12 | 18 | 66.7 | 75 | 75 | 111 |
Will Ole Miss Extend Streak? Can USC Top Oregon? Joel Klatt's Week 4 CFB Picks. Week 4 is filled with multiple top-25 games and conference showdowns, take a look at Joel Klatt's picks.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEOregon news: Star tight end Jamari Johnson headlines injury report vs. USC. Oregon football already suffered a shocking loss in 2026, d ropping a Week 2 road game against Oklahoma State as a heavy favorite. Of course, that doesn’t knock the Ducks out of College Football Playoff contention just yet, but with a tough Big Ten schedule ahead, it certainly puts Dan Lanning and company behind the 8-ball.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEA new Polymarket prediction market lists nine Big Ten football teams with 3% or greater odds to win the Big Ten Championship this season. Ryan Day ‘s Ohio State Buckeyes , which haven’t won a Big Ten title since 2020, are currently trending as an early season favorite with 36% odds as of 11:30 pm ET on Sept. 23 . They sit just ahead of Indiana (25%) and Oregon (12%). Penn State and USC also currently sit at or above 6% odds. Key points from the original article: • Ohio State Buckeyes – 36% • Indiana Hoosiers – 25% • Oregon Ducks – 12% • T4. Penn State Nittany Lions – 6% • T4. USC Trojans – 6% • T6. Michigan Wolverines – 4% • T6. UCLA Bruins – 4% • T8. Iowa Hawkeyes – 3% • T8. Northwestern Wildcats – 3% • Teams 10-18
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEUSC Cornerback Jontez Williams Clarifies Injury Status. Cornerback Jontez Williams believes that No. 12 USC Trojans' defense will get back on track in their top-25 matchup versus the No. 20 Oregon Ducks in Week 4 (Sept.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATE5 key takeaways from Big Ten football after Week 3. After Week 3 the Big Ten does not have a clear consensus on who will win the conference, just many potential contenders in a cluttered race Each week continues to be filled with new and intriguing storylines in the Big Ten. The Big Ten is as deep and competitive as it's ever been. Key points from the original article: 1. Oregon's offense is still elite 2. Penn State will be a problem this season 3. The Big Ten is deeper than just top two teams 4. Indiana should be ranked higher 5. UCLA is a huge dark horse in this conference
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEJeremiah McClellan injury update: Oregon WR broke foot in pregame, out indefinitely. Oregon receiver Jeremiah McClellan broke his foot during pregame in Week 3, a big blow for the Ducks ahead of USC matchup.
READ UPDATE →FEATURED STATTAKEThe eight-point upset will be remembered as Oregon collapsing. The 554–281 yardage gap says Oklahoma State controlled far more of the afternoon than the final score suggests.
READ UPDATE →RANKINGS OPINIONThe Ducks beat Boise State by seven but won the yardage battle by 223. What were AP voters actually grading?
READ UPDATE →Track class strength, position balance and roster needs across signing cycles.
See how efficiently signed talent develops into starts, impact and wins.
Separate returning development from incoming and outgoing portal value.
Wins, efficiency and schedule strength in one timeline.
Home, road, favorite and underdog performance.
Recent form versus the long-term series story.
Drafted players by position and development path.