Four-year talent direction
Track class strength, position balance and roster needs across signing cycles.

Complete schedules, team production, player statistics, news, analytics, recruiting and program history in one fan destination.
Record: 12–2 (Schedule & Results)
Conference: Big Ten
Players: 68
Points For: 619
Points/Game: 44.2
Points Against: 231
Opp. Points/Game: 16.5
Season totals organized for quick comparison. Swipe horizontally for more.
| PASS CMP | PASS ATT | PASS YDS | PASS % | PASS AVG | PASS TD | PASS INT | PASS RTG | SACK | RUSH ATT | RUSH YDS | RUSH AVG | RUSH TD | REC | REC YDS | REC AVG | REC TD | PTS/G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 397 | 513 | 4,857 | 77.4 | 9.5 | 49 | 4 | 186.9 | 0 | 423 | 2,626 | 6.2 | 33 | 397 | 4,857 | 12.2 | 49 | 44.2 |
The verified team snapshot is loading now.
| PLAYER | CMP | ATT | YDS | CMP% | AVG | TD | INT | RTG | SACK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B. NixQB | 364 | 470 | 4508 | 77.4 | 9.6 | 45 | 3 | 188.3 | — |
| T. ThompsonTE | 24 | 31 | 297 | 77.4 | 9.6 | 4 | 1 | 194.0 | — |
| A. NovosadQB | 9 | 11 | 52 | 81.8 | 4.7 | 0 | 0 | 121.5 | — |
| B. IrvingRB | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 397 | 513 | 4,857 | 77.4 | 9.5 | 49 | 4 | 186.9 | 0 |
| PLAYER | CAR | YDS | AVG | LNG | TD | FUM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B. IrvingRB | 186 | 1180 | 6.3 | 56 | 11 | — |
| J. JamesRB | 107 | 759 | 7.1 | 37 | 11 | — |
| B. NixQB | 54 | 234 | 4.3 | 44 | 6 | — |
| N. WhittingtonRB | 20 | 146 | 7.3 | 41 | 2 | — |
| J. LimarRB | 24 | 109 | 4.5 | 21 | 1 | — |
| D. DowdellRB | 17 | 90 | 5.3 | 13 | 1 | — |
| T. ThompsonTE | 8 | 48 | 6.0 | 13 | 0 | — |
| C. RogersDL | 1 | 18 | 18.0 | 18 | 0 | — |
| G. Bryant Jr.WR | 3 | 18 | 6.0 | 15 | 0 | — |
| K. SadiqTE | 1 | 12 | 12.0 | 12 | 0 | — |
| T. HoldenWR | 2 | 12 | 6.0 | 7 | 1 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 423 | 2,626 | 6.2 | 56 | 33 | 0 |
| PLAYER | REC | YDS | AVG | LNG | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T. FranklinWR | 81 | 1383 | 17.1 | 84 | 14 |
| T. JohnsonWR | 86 | 1182 | 13.7 | 77 | 10 |
| T. HoldenWR | 37 | 452 | 12.2 | 63 | 6 |
| G. Bryant Jr.WR | 30 | 442 | 14.7 | 71 | 4 |
| T. FergusonTE | 42 | 414 | 9.9 | 33 | 6 |
| B. IrvingRB | 56 | 413 | 7.4 | 42 | 2 |
| P. HerbertTE | 15 | 196 | 13.1 | 49 | 3 |
| J. JamesRB | 15 | 132 | 8.8 | 30 | 1 |
| N. WhittingtonRB | 10 | 84 | 8.4 | 31 | 0 |
| J. LimarRB | 7 | 61 | 8.7 | 18 | 0 |
| C. KellyTE | 5 | 37 | 7.4 | 19 | 2 |
| K. SadiqTE | 5 | 24 | 4.8 | 9 | 1 |
| D. AndersonWR | 4 | 21 | 5.3 | 16 | 0 |
| K. HutsonWR | 1 | 8 | 8.0 | 8 | 0 |
| J. DickeyWR | 1 | 7 | 7.0 | 7 | 0 |
| K. KasperWR | 2 | 1 | 0.5 | 5 | 0 |
| TEAM TOTALS | 397 | 4,857 | 12.2 | 84 | 49 |
| PLAYER | TOT | SOLO | AST | TFL | SACK | INT | PD | FF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E. WilliamsDB | 82 | 49 | — | 5.0 | 4.5 | — | 1 | — |
| J. BassaLB | 71 | 42 | — | 3.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — |
| T. JohnsonDB | 70 | 37 | — | 4.5 | 1 | 2 | 7 | — |
| S. Stephens IVDB | 56 | 33 | — | 2.0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | — |
| B. BoettcherLB | 37 | 15 | — | 2.5 | 1 | — | 0 | — |
| J. BurchDE | 34 | 13 | — | 7.5 | 3 | — | 1 | — |
| K. JacksonDB | 34 | 25 | — | 5 | 2 | 3 | 7 | — |
| J. JacobsLB | 32 | 18 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | — |
| J. HillLB | 31 | 13 | — | 5 | 2 | — | 2 | — |
| T. TuiotiLB | 29 | 19 | — | 4 | 2 | — | 1 | — |
| J. FlorenceCB | 27 | 21 | — | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | — |
| B. DorlusDE | 25 | 14 | — | 6.5 | 5 | — | 7 | — |
| D. ManningDB | 25 | 17 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | — |
| N. ReedDB | 25 | 18 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 7 | — |
| T. TaimaniDL | 22 | 8 | — | 1.5 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| C. RogersDL | 21 | 5 | — | 2.5 | 1.5 | — | 0 | — |
| C. MartinDB | 21 | 13 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — |
| K. Ware-HudsonDT | 21 | 9 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | — |
| M. FunaLB | 21 | 10 | — | 2.5 | 1 | — | 0 | — |
| C. SoelleLB | 19 | 8 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| E. WinstonDL | 19 | 5 | — | 0.5 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| M. UiagaleleiLB | 18 | 9 | — | 3 | 2 | — | 2 | — |
| P. AumavaeDT | 18 | 9 | — | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | — |
| D. JacksonLB | 17 | 5 | — | 1.5 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| T. BridgesDB | 16 | 7 | — | 0.5 | 0 | — | 2 | — |
| B. AddisonDB | 11 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — |
| J. ShipleyDL | 7 | 3 | — | 1.5 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| K. TerrellCB | 6 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| B. PurchaseDE | 5 | 4 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | — |
| J. MixonLB | 5 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — |
| R. PleasantDB | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| D. AustinS | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| L. BassoLS | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| T. GreenDL | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| A. WashingtonDL | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| B. RobertsDL | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| D. DavidS | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| J. MooreDL | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. Bowens IIIDL | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| A. PorterDL | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| G. Bryant Jr.WR | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. JamesRB | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| K. SadiqTE | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| M. VidackovicDB | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| M. GardnerDL | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| R. JamesP | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| T. HoldenWR | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| Z. GrishamDB | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| T. TurnerS | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 857 | 453 | 0 | 71 | 34 | 12 | 58 | 0 |
| PLAYER | FGM | FGA | FG% | XPM | XPA | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. LewisPK | 12 | 18 | — | 70 | 70 | 106 |
| G. MeadorsPK | 0 | 0 | — | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| TEAM TOTALS | 12 | 18 | 66.7 | 75 | 75 | 111 |
Michigan and Oregon are set to face off this weekend in Eugene. “Outstanding football coach, defensive minded coach. He really does a great job recruiting and It doesn’t hurt that you have $50+ million dollars at your disposal to, in essence outbid everybody,” Whittingham said . I mean, that’s a credit to their program and their dedication and desire to win and the support they have. NIL is the name of the game in recruiting these days. “It used to be the facilities you had and the tradition and all these other things, and now it’s, ‘Oh, this is all great, but these guys have a hundred grand more for me. So that’s a little bit of a factor to say the least. But not to take anything away from Dan, because he is an outstanding recruiter.”
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEOn3 is breaking down the top 10 transfer portal impact players based on weekly performances. Here are the most impactful from Week 10, In the new era of college football, the transfer portal has become a significant component of roster construction. Here are the most impactful transfer portal players from Week 10: Key points from the original article: 1. Texas Tech QB Thomas Castellanos 2. Tennessee DB Qua Moss 3. Oregon QB Dylan Raiola 4. Alabama EDGE Devan Thompkins 5. West Virginia QB Michael Hawkins 6. Texas RB Raleek Brown 7. Baylor QB DJ Lagway 8. UCLA QB Ty Dieffenbach 9. Tulsa WR Oran Singleton 10. UCLA WR Aidan Mizell
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEThey also just lost 41-28 to Oregon and with two Big Ten losses, there are a lot of teams tied as there’s a race for the top two spots to get into the final Big Ten Championship. In fact, that’s the only way Ohio State is getting in: win the Big Ten. “The H word is all that matters right now, and that’s hope,” Meyer said on The Triple Option . “The minute you lose hope … You see it across the country when the Florida States of the world, they just shut it down … Everything is still on the table. Those first two teams, Indiana and UCLA , I predict one of them is going to lose … I don’t think Indiana is good enough to win it all this year. I think they’re good enough to make a dent. “Ohio State, if you just say roster talent, is better than those two teams. You just mentioned they play Northwestern , Nebraska , and the Wolverines .
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEWhat Teitum Tuioti's injury means for Oregon Ducks defensive line. With Oregon Ducks' star defensive lineman Teitum Tuioti out for the year, here's how the rest of the defensive line will be impacted.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEOregon Loses Another Star for Remainder of Season to Injury. As the Ducks surge back into playoff contention, Dan Lanning’s defense must now replace linebacker Teitum Tuioti’s elite pass-rushing production following a devastating season-ending injury.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATETuioti was hurt in the fourth quarter on a pass-rushing rep against Buckeyes quarterback Luke Fahey . He was helped off the field and into the team’s medical tent, and he was later spotted wearing a brace on his left knee. [ $39.99 gets you a FULL year of On3 | Rivals national coverage ] “Yeah, Teitum has been unbelievable for us this year and every year that he’s been here,” Lanning said. “He’s just, watching him grow as a player and a person has been a lot of fun for us. But unfortunately for us, Teitum is done for the year. He’s going to have to wait for a little bit to let things settle down.” Before he was hurt, Teitum Tuioti had registered two tackles and a tackle for a loss.
READ UPDATE →STATTAKELosing Dante Moore should have narrowed Oregon’s options. Dylan Raiola entered and showed why the Ducks’ ceiling is bigger than one quarterback.
READ UPDATE →FEATURED STATTAKEUSC is 4–0 because its quarterback has erased nearly every mistake. The Oregon conversation should be about whether the Trojans can win without asking him to do that again.
READ UPDATE →Track class strength, position balance and roster needs across signing cycles.
See how efficiently signed talent develops into starts, impact and wins.
Separate returning development from incoming and outgoing portal value.
Wins, efficiency and schedule strength in one timeline.
Home, road, favorite and underdog performance.
Recent form versus the long-term series story.
Drafted players by position and development path.