San José State
Fresno State
Louisiana
Rutgers
Oregon
Washington
Penn State
Wisconsin
Ohio State
Indiana
Maryland
UCLAFour-year talent direction
Track class strength, position balance and roster needs across signing cycles.
STATTAKE DATABASEFIND ANY TEAM OR PLAYER
Big Ten • FBS TEAM DATABASE
USC
Complete schedules, team production, player statistics, news, analytics, recruiting and program history in one fan destination.
2026 SEASON DATABASE
USC football
Record: 7–2 (Schedule & Results)
Conference: Big Ten
Players: 61
Points For: 292
Points/Game: 32.4
Points Against: 218
Opp. Points/Game: 24.2
2026 SEASON
LIVE SCOREBOARD →Schedule & results
OFFICIAL SCHEDULE FEEDOpponent names and logos open team pages. Dates and results open StatTake box scores.
WEEKOPPONENTLOCATIONGAME
WEEK 7BYE——
WEEK 10BYE——
TEAM PRODUCTION
Team stats
Season totals organized for quick comparison. Swipe horizontally for more.
2026 SEASON TOTALS
ALL GAMESOffense at a glance
| PASS CMP | PASS ATT | PASS YDS | PASS % | PASS AVG | PASS TD | PASS INT | PASS RTG | SACK | RUSH ATT | RUSH YDS | RUSH AVG | RUSH TD | REC | REC YDS | REC AVG | REC TD | PTS/G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 210 | 310 | 2,651 | 67.7 | 8.6 | 20 | 6 | 157.0 | 0 | 289 | 1,181 | 4.1 | 14 | 210 | 2,651 | 12.6 | 20 | 32.4 |
TEAM ANALYTICS CENTER
OPEN NATIONAL ANALYTICS →USC analytics
LOADING 2026 EPA METRICS
The verified team snapshot is loading now.
2026 COMPLETE TEAM ROSTER
PLAYER PROFILES →Individual player statistics
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Passing
| PLAYER | CMP | ATT | YDS | CMP% | AVG | TD | INT | RTG | SACK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J. MaiavaQB | 198 | 296 | 2525 | 66.9 | 8.5 | 20 | 5 | 157.5 | — |
| J. WilliamsQB | 12 | 14 | 126 | 85.7 | 9.0 | 0 | 1 | 147.0 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 210 | 310 | 2,651 | 67.7 | 8.6 | 20 | 6 | 157.0 | 0 |
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Rushing
| PLAYER | CAR | YDS | AVG | LNG | TD | FUM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K. MillerRB | 138 | 681 | 4.9 | 35 | 5 | — |
| W. JordanRB | 75 | 335 | 4.5 | 20 | 3 | — |
| S. AlstonRB | 24 | 120 | 5.0 | 15 | 1 | — |
| R. WormleyRB | 13 | 71 | 5.5 | 27 | 2 | — |
| D. RedeauxRB | 6 | 37 | 6.2 | 15 | 1 | — |
| T. MosleyWR | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 9 | 0 | — |
| J. WilliamsQB | 3 | 3 | 1.0 | 9 | 0 | — |
| K. Dixon-WyattWR | 1 | -5 | -5.0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| Z. WilliamsWR | 1 | -7 | -7.0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| J. MaiavaQB | 26 | -71 | -2.7 | 12 | 2 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 289 | 1,181 | 4.1 | 35 | 14 | 0 |
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Receiving
| PLAYER | REC | YDS | AVG | LNG | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T. MosleyWR | 32 | 512 | 16.0 | 69 | 6 |
| K. Dixon-WyattWR | 32 | 443 | 13.8 | 32 | 4 |
| Z. WilliamsWR | 21 | 344 | 16.4 | 44 | 1 |
| M. BowmanTE | 24 | 283 | 11.8 | 70 | 2 |
| T. HinesWR | 19 | 239 | 12.6 | 40 | 4 |
| C. SimmsWR | 12 | 178 | 14.8 | 52 | 1 |
| T. BakerWR | 9 | 124 | 13.8 | 27 | 0 |
| E. FeasterWR | 10 | 96 | 9.6 | 27 | 0 |
| R. WormleyRB | 9 | 78 | 8.7 | 19 | 1 |
| C. TabaracciTE | 9 | 73 | 8.1 | 29 | 0 |
| T. TupouTE | 8 | 71 | 8.9 | 25 | 1 |
| W. JordanRB | 7 | 51 | 7.3 | 20 | 0 |
| T. AndersonWR | 2 | 50 | 25.0 | 28 | 0 |
| K. MillerRB | 9 | 49 | 5.4 | 12 | 0 |
| T. AshcraftTE | 4 | 36 | 9.0 | 12 | 0 |
| S. AlstonRB | 2 | 12 | 6.0 | 15 | 0 |
| W. MatthewsTE | 1 | 12 | 12.0 | 12 | 0 |
| TEAM TOTALS | 210 | 2,651 | 12.6 | 70 | 20 |
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Defense
| PLAYER | TOT | SOLO | AST | TFL | SACK | INT | PD | FF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D. BryantLB | 55 | 32 | — | 0.5 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| C. PierceS | 49 | 31 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | — |
| D. Stephens IILB | 45 | 27 | — | 4.5 | 0.5 | — | 2 | — |
| L. WafleDE | 36 | 26 | — | 8.5 | 3 | — | 1 | — |
| K. CrawfordDE | 30 | 16 | — | 5.0 | 2.0 | — | 0 | — |
| K. UrlacherS | 29 | 23 | — | 5 | 3 | — | 1 | — |
| J. AbasiriDT | 24 | 15 | — | 3.5 | 1 | — | 0 | — |
| P. BrownCB | 21 | 13 | — | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | — |
| A. GrahamCB | 20 | 12 | — | 3.0 | 2 | — | 0 | — |
| J. WilliamsCB | 18 | 10 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 2 | — |
| A. VanSumerenDT | 17 | 8 | — | 2.0 | 0.5 | — | 0 | — |
| T. RobinsonLB | 17 | 12 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — |
| B. ShelbyDE | 14 | 8 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — |
| C. JohnsonCB | 14 | 12 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — |
| Z. FisherDE | 14 | 7 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — |
| J. WalkerLB | 11 | 9 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| F. BoucardDT | 10 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. StewartDT | 10 | 8 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| R. SermonsCB | 9 | 8 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| T. IliLB | 8 | 7 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| M. WilliamsCB | 6 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. RamosDE | 5 | 4 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — |
| E. Hill IVCB | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| I. RubinS | 4 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| E. NewbyLB | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | — |
| J. JarrettDT | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| M. RiordanS | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| S. KatoangaDE | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| C. PierceCB | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| G. RufoLB | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. WinfieldDT | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. CrowderCB | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| R. O'ConnellLB | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| T. TopuiDT | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| A. DunnOL | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| B. LockhartCB | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| E. FeasterWR | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. JohnsonDT | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. MaiavaQB | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| P. DyerS | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| T. MosleyWR | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 501 | 321 | 0 | 44 | 19 | 3 | 17 | 0 |
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Kicking & Scoring
| PLAYER | FGM | FGA | FG% | XPM | XPA | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. ChittendenPK | 9 | 12 | — | 34 | 34 | 61 |
| R. SayeriP | 1 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| TEAM TOTALS | 10 | 14 | 71.4 | 34 | 34 | 64 |
TEAM NEWS + STATTAKE ARTICLES
ALL CFB NEWS →Latest USC coverage
NATIONAL UPDATE
Indiana: Playoff expansion will not only mean more teams in the field and the end…
Playoff expansion will not only mean more teams in the field and the end of conference championship games, but also have a massive impact on the schedule going forward. Each team now has two bye weeks each season, but will need to make the most of that extra week off because teams in the Power Four will now have to play 10 Power Four opponents (or Notre Dame ) on their schedules. With each of those conferences expanding to nine-game conference schedules, teams must find one Power Four non-conference opponent to add to their schedules to qualify for College Football Playoff consideration. The majority of teams already hit that mark, but it will force a handful of programs to scramble over the coming months to adjust their 2027 schedules (and beyond) to meet that new requirement. A handful of teams are currently saved by the Oregon State and Washington State rule. For now, Oregon State and Washington State still count as P4 teams after the old Pac-12 abandoned them, and that will continue in 2027, sources told CBS Sports' Richard Johnson. Ole Miss plays the Beavers, and Washington , Arizona and Kansas all get the Cougars in 2027. The Notre Dame inclusion (along with various in-state
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEIndiana: Curt Cignetti not ready to name starting QB for No.
Curt Cignetti not ready to name starting QB for No. 4 Indiana's upcoming game against No. 20 USC. Josh Hoover has been Indiana's starting QB this year, but was replaced due to injury by Grant Wilson in the Hoosiers' last game.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEUSC: Hoosier QB?
Hoosier QB? Cignetti not ready to name starter vs. USC. With quarterback Josh Hoover still on the mend from an arm injury, Curt Cignetti says he'll "see how the week plays out" before naming a starter for Saturday's affair against USC.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATECollege football odds, lines, schedule for Week 11: LSU, Indiana open as favorites…
College football odds, lines, schedule for Week 11: LSU, Indiana open as favorites in key conference battles. Indiana hosts USC in a pivotal Big Ten clash while Georgia, LSU and unbeaten Utah navigate tricky conference tests as the playoff race heats up Week 11 of the college football season doesn't carry the same curb appeal as Week 10 in terms of ranked vs. ranked matchups. But it is nonetheless littered with challenging games for College Football Playoff hopefuls and national championship contenders. Key points from the original article: • The big games • Best of the rest
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEUSC: Top 10 games for Week 11 of the college football season.
USC-Indiana, LSU-Texas and Wake Forest-SMU highlight the top 10 games of Week 11 of the college football season. There are only three weeks left in the college football regular season, and there are a lot of important games still to be played. Week 11 includes four top 25 games, according to the AP Poll rankings. It’s a big week in the ACC, and there are potential upsets in the other major conferences. Key points from the original article: 1. USC at Indiana 2. Texas at LSU 3. Wake Forest at SMU 4. Utah at Arizona 5. Missouri at Georgia 6. Texas Tech at Oklahoma State 7. Duke at Miami 8. Northwestern at Ohio State 9. Illinois at UCLA 10. Baylor at BYU
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATE‘Red Flags Going All Over There’ — Joel Klatt Calls Out CFP Committee’s Explanatio…
‘Red Flags Going All Over There’ — Joel Klatt Calls Out CFP Committee’s Explanation for Ohio State’s Surprise Ranking. The Ohio State Buckeyes have suffered a triple whammy in the past few weeks after quarterback Julian Sayin was ruled out indefinitely with a right throwing arm injury, a Week 9 loss to the USC Trojans, and a lowly College Football Playoff ranking. The Buckeyes were ranked No.
READ UPDATE →STATTAKEWhy Is 4–0 UCLA Still Ranked Behind USC?
USC has the better brand and the better loss. UCLA has two Power Four road wins, a 2–0 Big Ten record and the weekend’s most complete performance.
READ UPDATE →STATTAKEOregon’s Backup Quarterback Made Its Biggest Win More Convincing
Losing Dante Moore should have narrowed Oregon’s options. Dylan Raiola entered and showed why the Ducks’ ceiling is bigger than one quarterback.
READ UPDATE →ROSTER BUILDING
RECRUITING HUB →Recruiting & development
Recruiting to production
See how efficiently signed talent develops into starts, impact and wins.
What transfers added
Separate returning development from incoming and outgoing portal value.
PROGRAM CONTEXT
TEAM TRENDS →History & trends
Wins, efficiency and schedule strength in one timeline.
Home, road, favorite and underdog performance.
Recent form versus the long-term series story.
Drafted players by position and development path.
Illinois
Iowa
Michigan
Michigan State