Alabama
Western Kentucky
Virginia
Florida State
Georgia Tech
Boston College
Wake Forest
Clemson
Syracuse
NC State
KentuckyFour-year talent direction
Track class strength, position balance and roster needs across signing cycles.
STATTAKE DATABASEFIND ANY TEAM OR PLAYER
ACC • FBS TEAM DATABASE
Louisville
Complete schedules, team production, player statistics, news, analytics, recruiting and program history in one fan destination.
2018 SEASON DATABASE
Louisville football
Record: 2–10 (Schedule & Results)
Conference: ACC
Players: 66
Points For: 237
Points/Game: 19.8
Points Against: 529
Opp. Points/Game: 44.1
2018 SEASON
LIVE SCOREBOARD →Schedule & results
OFFICIAL SCHEDULE FEEDOpponent names and logos open team pages. Dates and results open StatTake box scores.
WEEKOPPONENTLOCATIONGAME
WEEK 6BYE——
WEEK 8BYE——
TEAM PRODUCTION
Team stats
Season totals organized for quick comparison. Swipe horizontally for more.
2018 SEASON TOTALS
ALL GAMESOffense at a glance
| PASS CMP | PASS ATT | PASS YDS | PASS % | PASS AVG | PASS TD | PASS INT | PASS RTG | SACK | RUSH ATT | RUSH YDS | RUSH AVG | RUSH TD | REC | REC YDS | REC AVG | REC TD | PTS/G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 210 | 394 | 2,533 | 53.3 | 6.4 | 10 | 15 | 108.1 | 0 | 403 | 1,718 | 4.3 | 18 | 211 | 2,542 | 12.0 | 10 | 19.8 |
TEAM ANALYTICS CENTER
OPEN NATIONAL ANALYTICS →Louisville analytics
LOADING 2018 EPA METRICS
The verified team snapshot is loading now.
2018 COMPLETE TEAM ROSTER
PLAYER PROFILES →Individual player statistics
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Passing
| PLAYER | CMP | ATT | YDS | CMP% | AVG | TD | INT | RTG | SACK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J. PassQB | 162 | 299 | 1960 | 54.2 | 6.6 | 8 | 12 | 110.0 | — |
| M. CunninghamQB | 40 | 67 | 473 | 59.7 | 7.1 | 1 | 1 | 120.9 | — |
| J. TravisQB | 4 | 14 | 71 | 28.6 | 5.1 | 1 | 1 | 80.5 | — |
| S. McCormackQB | 4 | 13 | 29 | 30.8 | 2.2 | 0 | 1 | 34.1 | — |
| C. SturghillDB | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 210 | 394 | 2,533 | 53.3 | 6.4 | 10 | 15 | 108.1 | 0 |
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Rushing
| PLAYER | CAR | YDS | AVG | LNG | TD | FUM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M. CunninghamQB | 79 | 497 | 6.3 | 75 | 5 | — |
| H. HallRB | 70 | 303 | 4.3 | 32 | 3 | — |
| T. SmithRB | 51 | 264 | 5.2 | 52 | 4 | — |
| J. SmithRB | 45 | 229 | 5.1 | 40 | 0 | — |
| C. WilsonRB | 39 | 208 | 5.3 | 32 | 1 | — |
| J. PassQB | 76 | 93 | 1.2 | 49 | 2 | — |
| D. WilliamsRB | 22 | 71 | 3.2 | 21 | 2 | — |
| J. TravisQB | 8 | 40 | 5.0 | 25 | 0 | — |
| J. HawkinsRB | 2 | 8 | 4.0 | 7 | 0 | — |
| M. RileyWR | 3 | 4 | 1.3 | 9 | 0 | — |
| M. BurkleyRB | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 3 | 0 | — |
| S. McCormackQB | 5 | 2 | 0.4 | 6 | 0 | — |
| M. BectonOL | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | — |
| T. AtwellWR | 1 | -5 | -5.0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 403 | 1,718 | 4.3 | 75 | 18 | 0 |
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Receiving
| PLAYER | REC | YDS | AVG | LNG | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J. SmithWR | 36 | 550 | 15.3 | 42 | 1 |
| D. FitzpatrickWR | 31 | 422 | 13.6 | 43 | 3 |
| T. AtwellWR | 24 | 406 | 16.9 | 53 | 2 |
| S. DawkinsWR | 25 | 329 | 13.2 | 47 | 1 |
| D. PeeteWR | 21 | 250 | 11.9 | 37 | 0 |
| M. CrumTE | 22 | 224 | 10.2 | 25 | 1 |
| H. HallRB | 12 | 99 | 8.3 | 15 | 0 |
| T. SmithRB | 10 | 74 | 7.4 | 27 | 0 |
| K. AverettTE | 8 | 65 | 8.1 | 15 | 2 |
| T. HarrellWR | 2 | 36 | 18.0 | 31 | 0 |
| J. DavisTE | 2 | 23 | 11.5 | 17 | 0 |
| C. WilsonRB | 4 | 22 | 5.5 | 9 | 0 |
| J. SmithRB | 4 | 15 | 3.8 | 8 | 0 |
| M. RileyWR | 3 | 9 | 3.0 | 6 | 0 |
| P. MbanasorDB | 1 | 9 | 9.0 | 9 | 0 |
| K. WakefieldWR | 1 | 7 | 7.0 | 7 | 0 |
| E. SpenceWR | 1 | 6 | 6.0 | 6 | 0 |
| J. HawkinsRB | 1 | 4 | 4.0 | 4 | 0 |
| D. WilliamsRB | 2 | -1 | -0.5 | 0 | 0 |
| C. BentleyOL | 1 | -7 | -7.0 | 0 | 0 |
| TEAM TOTALS | 211 | 2,542 | 12.0 | 53 | 10 |
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Defense
| PLAYER | TOT | SOLO | AST | TFL | SACK | INT | PD | FF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D. SmithS | 65 | 35 | — | 1.5 | 0.5 | — | 1 | — |
| C. AveryLB | 52 | 29 | — | 2.5 | 0.5 | 2 | 1 | — |
| K. PassDB | 51 | 34 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| D. EtheridgeLB | 49 | 30 | — | 4.0 | 0.5 | — | 3 | — |
| A. CabanDL | 46 | 27 | — | 6.5 | 2 | — | 0 | — |
| T. PetersonDL | 46 | 24 | — | 4.5 | 1.0 | — | 1 | — |
| N. OkekeLB | 41 | 22 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| L. IakopoS | 40 | 24 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| P. BlueLB | 38 | 26 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| R. BurnsLB | 32 | 19 | — | 1.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — |
| T. SmithS | 28 | 18 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| H. FamurewaDL | 24 | 12 | — | 2.5 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| C. SturghillDB | 23 | 17 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | — |
| J. GoldwireDL | 23 | 10 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| R. HicksLB | 23 | 13 | — | 2.0 | 0.5 | — | 0 | — |
| G. RobinsonDL | 21 | 13 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — |
| D. DorseyDL | 19 | 10 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — |
| C. JonesDB | 16 | 10 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — |
| M. CharacterDB | 16 | 8 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| P. MbanasorDB | 16 | 11 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | — |
| J. JacksonDL | 15 | 8 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | — |
| A. JohnsonDB | 10 | 9 | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — |
| M. BoykinDL | 8 | 4 | — | 0.5 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| Y. AbdullahLB | 8 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| D. Dumervil-JeanDL | 7 | 1 | — | 0.5 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| L. ThomasDB | 7 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| R. YeastDB | 7 | 4 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — |
| Q. HeadLB | 6 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| T. TroutmanLB | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| B. WhitlowLB | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| D. PeeteWR | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| E. O'HaraPK | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| T. PlummerDB | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. PassQB | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| L. FoyOL | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| M. ClarkDL | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| M. HallLS | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| A. FloydCB | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| C. BentleyOL | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| C. ReedWR | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| D. SmithLB | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. SmithWR | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| K. RoachS | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| K. AverettTE | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| M. KingP | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| M. BurkleyRB | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| S. McCormackQB | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| T. SmithRB | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| T. AtwellWR | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 775 | 451 | 0 | 41 | 11 | 6 | 18 | 0 |
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Kicking & Scoring
| PLAYER | FGM | FGA | FG% | XPM | XPA | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B. CrequePK | 10 | 12 | — | 27 | 30 | 57 |
| TEAM TOTALS | 10 | 12 | 83.3 | 27 | 30 | 57 |
TEAM NEWS + STATTAKE ARTICLES
ALL CFB NEWS →Latest Louisville coverage
NATIONAL UPDATE
UCF RB Watson Hits Top Speed Among FBS Ballcarriers.
UCF RB Watson Hits Top Speed Among FBS Ballcarriers. Louisville transfer Duke Watson ignited the Knights' ground game against Georgia State, clocking an elite 21. 6 mph sprint during a dominant 177-yard performance.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEThree Louisville players earn ACC honors.
Three Louisville players earn ACC honors. From U of L: The University of Louisville football program had three student-athletes earn Atlantic Coast Conference weekly honors announced by the league on Monday afternoon. Running back Keyjuan Brown, offensive lineman Eryx Daugherty and defensive back Kaleb Beasley were all recognized for their performances in Louisville’s 41-31 victory over No. 16 SMU on Saturday.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEHow is the conference shaping up a month into the season?
How is the conference shaping up a month into the season? We are now three weeks/four weeks (depending on what you want to count the abbreviated Week 0 as) into the 2026 college football season. At this point, all but three ACC teams have at least one conference game in the books. That includes our own North Carolina Tar Heels, although that didn't go great, as they blew a multi-score lead to Clemson. Key points from the original article: 1. Miami (3-0, 2-0 ACC) 2. Louisville (2-1, 1-0 ACC) 3. SMU (2-1, 1-1 ACC) 4. Virginia Tech (3-0) 5. Duke (3-0, 1-0 ACC) 6. Pitt (3-0, 1-0 ACC) 7. Virginia (2-1, 1-0 ACC) 8. Wake Forest (2-1, 0-1 ACC) 9. Clemson (2-1, 1-0 ACC) 10. Cal (2-1, 1-0 ACC) 11. Florida State (1-2, 0-1 ACC) 12. North Carolina (2-1, 0-1 ACC) 13. Georgia Tech (1-2) 14. NC State (1-2, 0-1 ACC) 15. Boston College (2-1) 16. Syracuse (1-2, 0-2 ACC) 17. Stanford (1-2, 0-2 ACC)
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATELouisville surges into No.
Louisville surges into No. 2 spot in ACC college football power rankings. A big win by Louisville against SMU has made a significant change to the top portion of the ACC college football power rankings.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEOle Miss: College Football Playoff projections: USA Today reveals 12-team field af…
If you had to add the resumes right now, it would The highlight of the weekend was Ole Miss beating LSU at home in Lane Kiffin’s return to Oxford. It shook up the rankings and projections. $19.99 gets you a FULL year of On3 | Rivals national coverage The ACC might have just gotten real interesting too! So let’s dive into USA Today’s projections, via Matt Hayes. At this rate, Ole Miss is going to grab the No. 1 seed through three games due to their wins over Louisville and LSU. Trinidad Chambliss looks like a Heisman contender and as long as he’s healthy, the Rebels are going to be one of the toughest teams to beat in the country.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATELouisville climbs to No.
Louisville climbs to No. 16 in AP poll. On the heels of its 41-31 win over SMU (and Ole Miss’ triumph over LSU), the Louisville football team has climbed seven spots from No. 23 to No.
READ UPDATE →STATTAKELouisville Didn’t Replace SMU in the ACC’s First Tier. It Expanded It.
The Cardinals won 41–31 with explosive runs and three takeaways. The Mustangs gained more yards and first downs—which is exactly why the conference race just became more complicated.
READ UPDATE →FEATURED ANALYSISOle Miss Returns 6,031 Yards. Louisville Must Shrink the Game.
Trinidad Chambliss and Kewan Lacy give No. 9 Ole Miss the weekend’s most proven backfield. No. 24 Louisville can counter with explosive rushing and a top-15 EPA defense—but only if it keeps the game from becoming a possession race.
READ UPDATE →ROSTER BUILDING
RECRUITING HUB →Recruiting & development
Recruiting to production
See how efficiently signed talent develops into starts, impact and wins.
What transfers added
Separate returning development from incoming and outgoing portal value.
PROGRAM CONTEXT
TEAM TRENDS →History & trends
Wins, efficiency and schedule strength in one timeline.
Home, road, favorite and underdog performance.
Recent form versus the long-term series story.
Drafted players by position and development path.
California
Duke