Four-year talent direction
Track class strength, position balance and roster needs across signing cycles.

Complete schedules, team production, player statistics, news, analytics, recruiting and program history in one fan destination.
Record: 4–8 (Schedule & Results)
Conference: Big Ten
Players: 64
Points For: 344
Points/Game: 28.7
Points Against: 381
Opp. Points/Game: 31.8
Season totals organized for quick comparison. Swipe horizontally for more.
| PASS CMP | PASS ATT | PASS YDS | PASS % | PASS AVG | PASS TD | PASS INT | PASS RTG | SACK | RUSH ATT | RUSH YDS | RUSH AVG | RUSH TD | REC | REC YDS | REC AVG | REC TD | PTS/G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 318 | 499 | 3,580 | 63.7 | 7.2 | 21 | 13 | 132.7 | 0 | 398 | 1,753 | 4.4 | 16 | 318 | 3,580 | 11.3 | 21 | 28.7 |
The verified team snapshot is loading now.
| PLAYER | CAR | YDS | AVG | LNG | TD | FUM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K. IngramRB | 156 | 911 | 5.8 | 53 | 5 | — |
| V. MalepeaiRB | 114 | 502 | 4.4 | 35 | 6 | — |
| D. BarlowRB | 62 | 289 | 4.7 | 16 | 2 | — |
| B. CampbellRB | 12 | 53 | 4.4 | 13 | 0 | — |
| J. DartQB | 22 | 43 | 2.0 | 18 | 2 | — |
| G. Bryant Jr.WR | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 3 | 1 | — |
| D. LondonWR | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 2 | 0 | — |
| E. KrommenhoekTE | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| M. MossQB | 3 | -14 | -4.7 | 10 | 0 | — |
| K. SlovisQB | 26 | -36 | -1.4 | 11 | 0 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 398 | 1,753 | 4.4 | 53 | 16 | 0 |
| PLAYER | REC | YDS | AVG | LNG | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D. LondonWR | 88 | 1084 | 12.3 | 44 | 7 |
| T. WashingtonWR | 54 | 602 | 11.1 | 29 | 1 |
| G. Bryant Jr.WR | 44 | 579 | 13.2 | 62 | 7 |
| K. FordWR | 19 | 252 | 13.3 | 45 | 2 |
| M. EppsTE | 10 | 173 | 17.3 | 41 | 1 |
| K. IngramRB | 22 | 156 | 7.1 | 32 | 0 |
| E. KrommenhoekTE | 15 | 137 | 9.1 | 20 | 1 |
| M. Jackson IIIWR | 12 | 116 | 9.7 | 21 | 0 |
| M. TriggTE | 7 | 109 | 15.6 | 46 | 1 |
| L. McReeTE | 7 | 91 | 13.0 | 19 | 0 |
| J. Manjack IVWR | 7 | 67 | 9.6 | 42 | 0 |
| V. MalepeaiRB | 12 | 65 | 5.4 | 14 | 0 |
| J. WolfeTE | 8 | 56 | 7.0 | 18 | 0 |
| K. NixonWR | 3 | 35 | 11.7 | 16 | 1 |
| D. BarlowRB | 4 | 22 | 5.5 | 14 | 0 |
| B. CampbellRB | 1 | 16 | 16.0 | 16 | 0 |
| J. Jackson IIIWR | 3 | 16 | 5.3 | 7 | 0 |
| K. HudsonWR | 2 | 4 | 2.0 | 5 | 0 |
| TEAM TOTALS | 318 | 3,580 | 11.3 | 62 | 21 |
| PLAYER | TOT | SOLO | AST | TFL | SACK | INT | PD | FF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K. MaugaLB | 92 | 56 | — | 5.5 | 1 | 1 | 2 | — |
| R. GoforthLB | 60 | 31 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| I. Pola-MaoS | 57 | 41 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| C. WilliamsDB | 48 | 31 | — | 2.5 | 1 | — | 1 | — |
| T. TuipulotuDL | 48 | 24 | — | 7.5 | 5.5 | — | 2 | — |
| C. BullockS | 39 | 25 | — | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | — |
| I. Taylor-StuartCB | 39 | 25 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | — |
| D. JacksonLB | 37 | 23 | — | 8 | 5 | 1 | 1 | — |
| C. SteeleCB | 33 | 19 | — | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | — |
| G. JohnsonS | 32 | 19 | — | 2.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — |
| X. AlfordDB | 31 | 27 | — | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | — |
| J. LichtensteinDL | 28 | 11 | — | 6.0 | 4 | — | 0 | — |
| R. ScottLB | 27 | 12 | — | 1.0 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| H. EcholsDL | 20 | 11 | — | 1.5 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| S. Ta'ufo'ouDL | 18 | 5 | — | 1.5 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| N. FigueroaDL | 16 | 8 | — | 3.5 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| C. Thompson Jr.LB | 11 | 6 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. SmithCB | 11 | 10 | — | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | — |
| K. ForemanDL | 11 | 7 | — | 3.5 | 2.5 | — | 0 | — |
| J. Jackson Jr.DB | 9 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — |
| J. SekonaDL | 8 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. WilliamsDB | 8 | 5 | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — |
| P. BrownCB | 7 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| T. NomuraLB | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| D. BentonDL | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| K. MakaulaDB | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| A. StadthausPK | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| C. WrightDB | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. FalanikoLB | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| M. GibbsOL | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| M. CroomDB | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| C. MooreLB | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| D. JohnsonLS | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| D. LondonWR | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| E. WinstonLB | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| G. JonesTE | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. DartQB | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. MonheimOL | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. DedichOL | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| K. NixonWR | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| K. SlovisQB | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| P. LewisPK | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| Q. JounttiRB | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| T. WashingtonWR | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| V. MalepeaiRB | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| X. GordonS | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| R. DavisLB | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 726 | 430 | 0 | 52 | 21 | 14 | 23 | 0 |
| PLAYER | FGM | FGA | FG% | XPM | XPA | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P. LewisPK | 17 | 22 | — | 23 | 24 | 74 |
| A. StadthausPK | 6 | 6 | — | 10 | 10 | 28 |
| TEAM TOTALS | 23 | 28 | 82.1 | 33 | 34 | 102 |
USC Cornerback Jontez Williams Clarifies Injury Status. Cornerback Jontez Williams believes that No. 12 USC Trojans' defense will get back on track in their top-25 matchup versus the No. 20 Oregon Ducks in Week 4 (Sept.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEBig Ten Football Power Poll: Week Three. A week as expected in Week 3 leads to one that should answer many questions in Week 4 Week three pretty much went as expected. The Big Ten was favorited big in a majority of the non-conference games, and they won those games. Key points from the original article: 1. Indiana Hoosiers 3-0 (1) 2. Ohio State Buckeyes 2-1 (3) 3. USC Trojans 4-0 (2) 4. Penn State Nittany Lions 3-0 (4) 5. Michigan Wolverines (3-0) (5) 6. Oregon Ducks 2-1 (8) 7. Iowa Hawkeyes 3-0 (7) 8. Washington Huskies 3-0 (6) 9. Nebraska Cornhuskers 3-0 (9) 10. UCLA Bruins 3-0 (10) 11. Minnesota Golden Gophers 2-1 (11) 12. Northwestern Wildcats 2-0 (13) 13. Illinois Fighting Illini 2-1 (12) 14. Wisconsin Badgers 2-1 (14) 15. Michigan State Spartans 2-1 (15) 16. Maryland Terrapins 2-1 (16) 17. Purdue Boilermakers 1-2 (17) 18. Rutgers Scarlet Knights 0-3 (18)
READ UPDATE →STATTAKEThe Trojans are 4–0. They also beat an 0–3 Rutgers team by seven while losing the second half by 80 yards. Both facts have to matter.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEBig Ten football power rankings after Week 3 - USC craters at Rutgers. USC fell several spots in the Big Ten rankings after a brutally ugly and undisciplined win over Rutgers The top teams in the Big Ten held serve in Week 3, while USC football fell a few spots in the rankings. The Trojans did not prove they are a different team this season, allowing Rutgers to hang with them. Key points from the original article: 1. Indiana Hoosiers (3-0) 2. Ohio State Buckeyes (2-1) 3. Oregon Ducks (2-1) 4. Penn State Nittany Lions (3-0) 5. USC Trojans (4-0) 6. UCLA Bruins (3-0) 7. Michigan Wolverines (3-0) 8. Iowa Hawkeyes (3-0) 9. Washington Huskies (3-0) 10. Wisconsin Badgers (2-1) 11. Illinois Fighting Illini (2-1) 12. Minnesota Golden Gophers (2-1) 13. Nebraska Cornhuskers (3-0) 14. Northwestern Wildcats (2-0) 15. Maryland Terrapins (2-1) 16. Michigan State Spartans (2-1) 17. Purdue Boilermakers (1-2) 18. Rutgers Scarlet Knights (0-3)
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEUSC's Kayden Dixon-Wyatt reduced the negative effects of the Trent Mosley injury With games having more meaning as Big Ten play starts, the USC Trojans ' freshmen are not playing as much. Still, the big focal points of this football team this year are freshmen. Kayden Dixon-Wyatt is no longer looked at as a freshman. This guy is a bona fide playmaker at receiver. He has taken the mantle of the great Trojans receivers last season. He has shown that if Jayden Maiava throws it in his direction, he is going to catch it. Instead of Terrell Anderson and Tanook Hines rising to become the top target for the Trojans, it is Dixon-Wyatt who picked up the slack the most.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEThe start of conference play shakes things up a little. It would have been funnier if both had lost, because then Rutgers and Purdue would be atop the conference. If you fell into a coma in 2021 after Purdue won the Music City Bowl and woke up today you wouldn't believe me if I told you: USC, UCLA, Washington, and Oregon are all in the Big Ten. Indiana is the defending National Champion in football Purdue has played in a Big Ten title game It has won fewer games (7) in the three years since that season when it won eight games. That's just Big Ten football, let alone the rest of the world.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEUSC-Oregon, Arch Manning's trip to Tennessee and Ole Miss-Florida highlight the Week 4 college football schedule. After Lane Kiffin ’s return to Ole Miss took up all the oxygen in the room this past week, the college football world can turn its attention to other teams. There’s a critical Big Ten game between USC and Oregon, and four ranked SEC matchups could have an effect on the College Football Playoff race. Here are the top 10 games on the schedule for Week 4. Key points from the original article: 1. Texas at Tennessee 2. Ole Miss at Florida 3. Oregon at USC 4. Texas A&M at LSU 5. Missouri at Mississippi State 6. Iowa at Michigan 7. Boise State at Western Michigan 8. Oklahoma at Georgia 9. Wisconsin at Penn State 10. Oklahoma State at West Virginia
READ UPDATE →WEEKEND ROUNDUPNorth Carolina supplied the upset, Virginia delivered the most complete performance, USC showed the highest ceiling, and two other Power Four winners left revealing evidence behind the score.
READ UPDATE →Track class strength, position balance and roster needs across signing cycles.
See how efficiently signed talent develops into starts, impact and wins.
Separate returning development from incoming and outgoing portal value.
Wins, efficiency and schedule strength in one timeline.
Home, road, favorite and underdog performance.
Recent form versus the long-term series story.
Drafted players by position and development path.