Cincinnati
San Diego State
Oklahoma
Washington State
Arizona
Oregon State
Stanford
Arizona State
Colorado
Utah
USC
CaliforniaFour-year talent direction
Track class strength, position balance and roster needs across signing cycles.
STATTAKE DATABASEFIND ANY TEAM OR PLAYER
Big Ten • FBS TEAM DATABASE
UCLA
Complete schedules, team production, player statistics, news, analytics, recruiting and program history in one fan destination.
2019 SEASON DATABASE
UCLA football
Record: 4–8 (Schedule & Results)
Conference: Big Ten
Players: 59
Points For: 320
Points/Game: 26.7
Points Against: 417
Opp. Points/Game: 34.8
2019 SEASON
LIVE SCOREBOARD →Schedule & results
OFFICIAL SCHEDULE FEEDOpponent names and logos open team pages. Dates and results open StatTake box scores.
WEEKOPPONENTLOCATIONGAME
WEEK 2BYE——
WEEK 9BYE——
WEEK 11BYE——
WEEK 13BYE——
TEAM PRODUCTION
Team stats
Season totals organized for quick comparison. Swipe horizontally for more.
2019 SEASON TOTALS
ALL GAMESOffense at a glance
| PASS CMP | PASS ATT | PASS YDS | PASS % | PASS AVG | PASS TD | PASS INT | PASS RTG | SACK | RUSH ATT | RUSH YDS | RUSH AVG | RUSH TD | REC | REC YDS | REC AVG | REC TD | PTS/G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 260 | 426 | 3,066 | 61.0 | 7.2 | 22 | 12 | 132.9 | 0 | 484 | 1,826 | 3.8 | 18 | 260 | 3,066 | 11.8 | 22 | 26.7 |
TEAM ANALYTICS CENTER
OPEN NATIONAL ANALYTICS →UCLA analytics
LOADING 2019 EPA METRICS
The verified team snapshot is loading now.
2019 COMPLETE TEAM ROSTER
PLAYER PROFILES →Individual player statistics
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Passing
| PLAYER | CMP | ATT | YDS | CMP% | AVG | TD | INT | RTG | SACK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D. Thompson-RobinsonQB | 216 | 362 | 2701 | 59.7 | 7.5 | 21 | 12 | 134.9 | — |
| A. BurtonQB | 44 | 64 | 365 | 68.8 | 5.7 | 1 | 0 | 121.8 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 260 | 426 | 3,066 | 61.0 | 7.2 | 22 | 12 | 132.9 | 0 |
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Rushing
| PLAYER | CAR | YDS | AVG | LNG | TD | FUM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J. KelleyRB | 229 | 1060 | 4.6 | 54 | 12 | — |
| D. FeltonRB | 86 | 331 | 3.8 | 75 | 1 | — |
| D. Thompson-RobinsonQB | 118 | 198 | 1.7 | 39 | 4 | — |
| A. BurtonQB | 23 | 100 | 4.3 | 16 | 1 | — |
| K. AllenWR | 13 | 63 | 4.8 | 23 | 0 | — |
| M. IrbyDB | 10 | 34 | 3.4 | 9 | 0 | — |
| C. KinderRB | 4 | 33 | 8.3 | 15 | 0 | — |
| K. PhilipsWR | 1 | 7 | 7.0 | 7 | 0 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 484 | 1,826 | 3.8 | 75 | 18 | 0 |
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Receiving
| PLAYER | REC | YDS | AVG | LNG | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K. PhilipsWR | 60 | 681 | 11.3 | 39 | 5 |
| D. AsiasiTE | 44 | 641 | 14.6 | 53 | 4 |
| D. FeltonRB | 55 | 594 | 10.8 | 94 | 4 |
| C. CotaWR | 25 | 350 | 14.0 | 61 | 3 |
| J. ErwinWR | 32 | 339 | 10.6 | 39 | 2 |
| G. DulcichTE | 8 | 105 | 13.1 | 31 | 1 |
| E. FerneaRB | 4 | 90 | 22.5 | 45 | 1 |
| J. WilsonTE | 7 | 72 | 10.3 | 21 | 0 |
| J. KelleyRB | 11 | 71 | 6.5 | 14 | 1 |
| M. IrbyDB | 5 | 48 | 9.6 | 12 | 0 |
| M. MartinezTE | 3 | 39 | 13.0 | 18 | 0 |
| K. AllenWR | 4 | 29 | 7.3 | 24 | 0 |
| D. HurtWR | 1 | 5 | 5.0 | 5 | 0 |
| M. LynchTE | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 2 | 1 |
| TEAM TOTALS | 260 | 3,066 | 11.8 | 94 | 22 |
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Defense
| PLAYER | TOT | SOLO | AST | TFL | SACK | INT | PD | FF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S. BlaylockDB | 86 | 65 | — | 1.5 | 0 | — | 3 | — |
| K. BarnesLB | 72 | 48 | — | 9.5 | 4.0 | 1 | 7 | — |
| L. ToailoaLB | 54 | 29 | — | 6.5 | 1.5 | — | 0 | — |
| J. WoodsLB | 50 | 28 | — | 6.0 | 4.5 | 1 | 1 | — |
| O. OdighizuwaDL | 46 | 25 | — | 10.0 | 3.5 | — | 1 | — |
| E. GatesDB | 37 | 29 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 3 | — |
| D. HolmesDB | 33 | 23 | — | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 | — |
| L. ToailoaLB | 33 | 17 | — | 7.0 | 2.5 | — | 1 | — |
| R. WilliamsDB | 33 | 30 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — |
| E. GuidryDB | 32 | 26 | — | 0.5 | 0.5 | — | 1 | — |
| J. ShawCB | 30 | 27 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | — |
| A. MafiOL | 28 | 12 | — | 4.0 | 1 | — | 0 | — |
| C. Jones Jr.DL | 24 | 13 | — | 3.0 | 1 | — | 1 | — |
| J. HarrisLB | 21 | 10 | — | 3.5 | 1.5 | — | 0 | — |
| T. ManoaDL | 19 | 11 | — | 0.5 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| Q. LakeDB | 18 | 9 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| K. Lucier-SouthLB | 17 | 9 | — | 6.0 | 2.5 | — | 4 | — |
| E. WadeDL | 12 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| O. OgbonniaDL | 12 | 9 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | — |
| S. PittsLB | 12 | 9 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — |
| O. IsiborLB | 10 | 7 | — | 2.5 | 2.5 | — | 0 | — |
| K. Churchwell IIIDB | 9 | 7 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| B. CalvertLB | 7 | 5 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| S. MasonDL | 7 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| D. JacksonDL | 5 | 3 | — | 0.5 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| M. Andrus Jr.DL | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| D. FeltonRB | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| D. Thompson-RobinsonQB | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| A. CohenLB | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| E. FerneaRB | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. DinneenLB | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| M. Osling IIIDB | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| D. AsiasiTE | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. MolsonPK | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. NorwoodWR | 2 | 1 | — | 0.5 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| K. PhilipsWR | 2 | 1 | — | 0.5 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| P. JollyDB | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| C. OlivasP | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| C. ArtopoeusQB | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| C. MurrayOL | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| E. OsteenLB | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. BurtonOL | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. AndersonLB | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. Gaines IIOL | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. KelleyRB | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 750 | 487 | 0 | 70 | 27 | 5 | 34 | 0 |
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Kicking & Scoring
| PLAYER | FGM | FGA | FG% | XPM | XPA | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J. MolsonPK | 8 | 14 | — | 40 | 40 | 64 |
| TEAM TOTALS | 8 | 14 | 57.1 | 40 | 40 | 64 |
TEAM NEWS + STATTAKE ARTICLES
ALL CFB NEWS →Latest UCLA coverage
NATIONAL UPDATE
UCLA football star Wayne Knight earns 2nd weekly award in 3-week span.
UCLA football star Wayne Knight earns 2nd weekly award in 3-week span. "This is the 2nd time in 3 weeks that Knight has been tabbed the Hornung Player of the Week. He was also selected after his 3-touchdown debut at Cal."
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATERanking the unranked, unbeaten P4 teams: Kansas State, UCLA are College Football P…
Ranking the unranked, unbeaten P4 teams: Kansas State, UCLA are College Football Playoff sleepers. Keep an eye on these teams outside the Top 25.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEUCLA: - Senior running back Wayne Knight has been nothing short of special in his…
- Senior running back Wayne Knight has been nothing short of special in his first two games as a Bruin and Saturday's matchup against Purdue was no different. Seniors Jaivian Thomas and Anthony Woods both scored at least one touchdown in the game, but Knight, to no surprise, was the undisputed leader. Pairing the Bruins' running back prowess with their strongest passing performance yet led to a 52-point scoring day, their highest-scoring game since they scored 59 points against North Carolina Central in 2023, but the Bruins needed each and every point as Purdue didn't make things easy on them. The Boilermakers seemed to answer the Bruins on nearly every drive throughout most of the game and even if the end result finished with UCLA winning with a two-touchdown lead, things didn't feel that way most of the time. Purdue's biggest strength was the passing performance from junior quarterback Ryan Browne , who in turn exposed that the weakest aspect of the Bruins at this point is their passing defense. "I think that quarterback is elite," head coach Bob Chesney said of Browne. "I think we were able to keep the running backs in check for the most part, but the quarterback and his timing
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEUCLA vs.
UCLA vs. Purdue Prediction, Odds, Picks for College Football Week 3. Get the latest UCLA vs. Purdue odds, prediction and pick for College Football Week 3, plus kickoff time, TV channel and streaming information.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEVirginia Tech: College football coaching carousel rumblings entering Week 3.
A year ago was one of the busiest college football coaching carousels in recent memory. Virginia Tech and UCLA fired their head coaches after 0-3 starts to the 2025 regular season. Industry sources tell On3 that it is unlikely, but games have to be played this weekend first. This weekend won’t get any easier, with No. What Greg Schiano built at Rutgers — and has continued to build on in his second stint with the Scarlet Knights — should not go unnoticed. He went 68-67 at Rutgers from 2001 to 2011, turning around one of the nation’s worst major college football programs. His revival of the program played a pivotal role in landing an invitation to the Big Ten. Rutgers went 0-18 in Big Ten play in the two seasons before his return in 2020.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATECollege football resume rankings: Texas on top as UCLA, Duke, Tulsa stand out earl…
College football resume rankings: Texas on top as UCLA, Duke, Tulsa stand out early in 2026 season. If you stripped away brand bias, preseason expectations, efficiency and future projections, here's what a truly meritocratic college football ranking would look like You won't find UCLA , Duke or Tulsa in this week's AP Top 25, in Tom Fornelli's power ratings or Brandon Marcello's power rankings. But entering Week 3 action, they have a home in the top 10 of a resume ranking. Key points from the original article: • Texas • Week 1: W vs. No. 88 Texas State (+0.09) Week 2: W vs. No. 5 Ohio State (+0.81) Resume score: +0.90 • Michigan • Week 1: W vs. No. 69 Western Michigan (+0.14) *** Considering this a Michigan win until the CFP Selection Committee indicates that it won't Week 2: W vs. No. 26 Oklahoma (+0.41) Resume score: 0.55 • Ole Miss • Week 1: W vs. No. 23 Louisville (Neutral) (+0.53) Week 2: W vs. No. 138 Charlotte (+0.01) Resume score: 0.54 • UCLA • Week 1: W @ No. 47 California (+0.33) Week 2: W vs. No. 54 San Diego State (+0.20) Resume score: 0.53 • Alabama • Week 1: W vs. No. 90 East Carolina (+0.09) Week 2: W @ No. 37 Kentucky (+0.41) Resume score: 0.50 • Duke • Week 1: W v
READ UPDATE →ROSTER BUILDING
RECRUITING HUB →Recruiting & development
Recruiting to production
See how efficiently signed talent develops into starts, impact and wins.
What transfers added
Separate returning development from incoming and outgoing portal value.
PROGRAM CONTEXT
TEAM TRENDS →History & trends
Wins, efficiency and schedule strength in one timeline.
Home, road, favorite and underdog performance.
Recent form versus the long-term series story.
Drafted players by position and development path.
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Maryland
Michigan
Michigan State