Four-year talent direction
Track class strength, position balance and roster needs across signing cycles.

Complete schedules, team production, player statistics, news, analytics, recruiting and program history in one fan destination.
Record: 2–0 (Schedule & Results)
Conference: SEC
Players: 46
Points For: 98
Points/Game: 49.0
Points Against: 20
Opp. Points/Game: 10.0
Season totals organized for quick comparison. Swipe horizontally for more.
| PASS CMP | PASS ATT | PASS YDS | PASS % | PASS AVG | PASS TD | PASS INT | PASS RTG | SACK | RUSH ATT | RUSH YDS | RUSH AVG | RUSH TD | REC | REC YDS | REC AVG | REC TD | PTS/G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 40 | 63 | 432 | 63.5 | 6.9 | 6 | 1 | 149.3 | 0 | 80 | 333 | 4.2 | 4 | 40 | 432 | 10.8 | 6 | 49.0 |
The verified team snapshot is loading now.
| PLAYER | CAR | YDS | AVG | LNG | TD | FUM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R. Owens IIRB | 27 | 112 | 4.1 | 15 | 1 | — |
| K. EdwardsRB | 8 | 66 | 8.3 | 13 | 0 | — |
| C. BakerRB | 9 | 58 | 6.4 | 13 | 1 | — |
| J. MorrowRB | 16 | 56 | 3.5 | 8 | 1 | — |
| M. ReedQB | 14 | 37 | 2.6 | 19 | 0 | — |
| T. BusseyWR | 4 | 10 | 2.5 | 10 | 1 | — |
| B. HartQB | 1 | 4 | 4.0 | 4 | 0 | — |
| T. WhiteP | 1 | -10 | -10.0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 80 | 333 | 4.2 | 19 | 4 | 0 |
| PLAYER | REC | YDS | AVG | LNG | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I. HortonWR | 7 | 109 | 15.6 | 36 | 3 |
| T. BusseyWR | 7 | 92 | 13.1 | 21 | 0 |
| M. CraverWR | 8 | 75 | 9.4 | 33 | 2 |
| J. MorrowRB | 4 | 36 | 9.0 | 13 | 0 |
| R. Owens IIRB | 3 | 32 | 10.7 | 18 | 0 |
| K. JohnsonWR | 3 | 25 | 8.3 | 12 | 0 |
| A. GregoryWR | 2 | 22 | 11.0 | 15 | 1 |
| A. Bethel-RomanWR | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 13 | 0 |
| M. RileyTE | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 7 | 0 |
| R. Anderson IIITE | 1 | 13 | 13.0 | 13 | 0 |
| K. EdwardsRB | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 2 | 0 |
| TEAM TOTALS | 40 | 432 | 10.8 | 36 | 6 |
| PLAYER | TOT | SOLO | AST | TFL | SACK | INT | PD | FF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N. MikhailLB | 13 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| R. ConeyLB | 12 | 4 | — | 1.5 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| M. RatcliffeS | 8 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| T. SearcyDE | 8 | 4 | — | 1.5 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| D. BrooksS | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| A. SakaDE | 5 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| M. JonesDE | 5 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| J. LockhartLB | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. ShawCB | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| M. DavisS | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| R. HendersonDE | 4 | 3 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — |
| B. RogersDB | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — |
| C. MimsDT | 3 | 1 | — | 0.5 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| D. HicksDT | 3 | 0 | — | 0.5 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| D. SandersDT | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| L. RinkDT | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| T. WatkinsLB | 3 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| T. GivensDE | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| B. Davis-SwainDT | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| C. CollinsS | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. HumphreyCB | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — |
| R. Gibson IIICB | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| B. ArringtonCB | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| B. Perry-WrightDE | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| D. RicksCB | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. KinslerDT | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| S. M'PembaDE | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| S. MoalaDE | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| T. NormanWR | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 109 | 45 | 0 | 11 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 0 |
And not for a reason either program expected. We could be looking at, for all intents and purposes, a College Football Playoff elimination game in Baton Rouge. ESPN’s Kirk Herbstreit went even a step further when discussing the potential fallout. He says the losing head coach might be in danger of his team checking out on the season. Despite the calendar still reading September, Herbstreit says the modern age of college football means some players might begin to think of the future instead of the final two months. [ $19.99 gets you a FULL year of On3 | Rivals national coverage ] “Whoever loses this game is going to have a team that is going to start having their agents talking about ‘Where am I going to go?’ “When their players are out of the Playoff, they lose interest quickly and they start thinking about their next season.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEAnxiety Rankings, Week 4: LSU-Texas A&M, USC-Oregon provide high-stakes matchups to close September. Plus, Texas has a lot to lose this weekend when it goes on the road to face Tennessee There are very few things in life that can stir emotions within you like college football . For four months a year, millions of Americans decide to put their mental well-being in the hands of a collection of 18- to 24-year-old men they do not know personally. Key points from the original article: 1. Anxiety Bowl I (Texas A&M at LSU) 2. Anxiety Bowl II (Oregon at USC) 3. Shane Beamer 4. Texas fans 5. Ryan Silverfield
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATENabou was the only position player in that class that was a three-star prospect in the Rivals Industry recruiting rankings. The rest were all four- or five-star prospects with nine of those players ranked among the top 3 prospects nationally at their respective positions. I was the underdog, kind of brushed off by everybody. “All I did was put my head down and keep working. Stars didn’t matter to me, and they still don’t.” Nabou, a fifth-year senior center, will make his 30 th start for Texas A&M on Saturday night against LSU at Tiger Stadium, a game that has a must-win feel to it for both teams, even this early in the season, if they want to stay at the forefront of the College Football Playoff chase. He’s the last one standing at Texas A&M from that ballyhooed 2022 class, at least the only remaining starter. Of the 29 freshmen that arrived on campus in 2022, only five finished their careers as Aggies.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATELSU vs. Texas A&M prediction, pick, odds, spread: Tigers, Aggies meet in early SEC showdown. The loser of this one will have two SEC defeats before the end of September Texas A&M's loss came in more stunning fashion as the Aggies fell 31-21 at home as a 16.5-point favorite against an upstart Kentucky program. The list of issues to correct for both programs is long. In both cases, erratic quarterback play is among them. The Tigers' passing game looks disjointed even after Kiffin signed the No. 1-ranked quarterback of the portal cycle in Sam Leavitt from Arizona State . Texas A&M's Marcel Reed -- now in Year 3 as the Aggies' starter -- is coming off a dreadful performance against Kentucky. Trying to get right in a night game at Tiger Stadium will be a challenge for A&M.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEKiffin was discussing the challenge of facing another dual-threat quarterback in Marcel Reed , fresh on the heels of facing Trinidad Chambliss at Ole Miss. It’s clear he was less than thrilled with how the schedule broke down. [ $19.99 gets you a FULL year of On3 | Rivals national coverage ] “Obviously we just played the best one in the country last week thinking he can hurt you even when you have the right call on and everybody covered and a guy comes free,” Kiffin said. “Obviously he played great a year ago here in the stadium, so this is one of those scheduling quirks just like last week where never in that LSU-Ole Miss series had it ever been played two times in a row.” Similarly, LSU will host Texas A&M this year after doing so last season. “That (Ole Miss) game was supposed to be here, and this one was supposed to be (at Texas A&M),” Kiffin said. ” So these are the scheduling quirks that come with our awesome move to nine games that has sure looked so great here lately.”
READ UPDATE →STATTAKEBlaming the opening-kickoff assignment misses the point. Bussey’s season-ending injury is painful because his versatility solved several roster problems at once.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATECFP news: Heather Dinich sends warning to LSU, Texas A&M before clash. One of the biggest games of the Week 4 slate in college football is between Texas A&M and LSU. Texas A&M fell to Kentucky , while LSU lost to Ole Miss. The two will look to avoid a second loss in conference play in a game with massive College Football Playoff implications.
READ UPDATE →STATTAKEThe Wildcats did not need more yards, more snaps or more possession. They needed one dominant quarter that exposed how little the Aggies could trust their offense under pressure.
READ UPDATE →Track class strength, position balance and roster needs across signing cycles.
See how efficiently signed talent develops into starts, impact and wins.
Separate returning development from incoming and outgoing portal value.
Wins, efficiency and schedule strength in one timeline.
Home, road, favorite and underdog performance.
Recent form versus the long-term series story.
Drafted players by position and development path.