Temple
Syracuse
Delaware
Michigan
Ohio State
Michigan State
Northwestern
Illinois
Wisconsin
Indiana
Penn State
Maryland
Wake ForestFour-year talent direction
Track class strength, position balance and roster needs across signing cycles.
STATTAKE DATABASEFIND ANY TEAM OR PLAYER
Big Ten • FBS TEAM DATABASE
Rutgers
Complete schedules, team production, player statistics, news, analytics, recruiting and program history in one fan destination.
2021 SEASON DATABASE
Rutgers football
Record: 5–8 (Schedule & Results)
Conference: Big Ten
Players: 64
Points For: 256
Points/Game: 19.7
Points Against: 333
Opp. Points/Game: 25.6
2021 SEASON
LIVE SCOREBOARD →Schedule & results
OFFICIAL SCHEDULE FEEDOpponent names and logos open team pages. Dates and results open StatTake box scores.
WEEKOPPONENTLOCATIONGAME
WEEK 8BYE——
POSTSEASONBOWL & PLAYOFF GAMES
TEAM PRODUCTION
Team stats
Season totals organized for quick comparison. Swipe horizontally for more.
2021 SEASON TOTALS
ALL GAMESOffense at a glance
| PASS CMP | PASS ATT | PASS YDS | PASS % | PASS AVG | PASS TD | PASS INT | PASS RTG | SACK | RUSH ATT | RUSH YDS | RUSH AVG | RUSH TD | REC | REC YDS | REC AVG | REC TD | PTS/G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 231 | 394 | 2,229 | 58.6 | 5.7 | 9 | 10 | 108.6 | 0 | 495 | 1,819 | 3.7 | 20 | 231 | 2,229 | 9.6 | 9 | 19.7 |
TEAM ANALYTICS CENTER
OPEN NATIONAL ANALYTICS →Rutgers analytics
LOADING 2021 EPA METRICS
The verified team snapshot is loading now.
2021 COMPLETE TEAM ROSTER
PLAYER PROFILES →Individual player statistics
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Passing
| PLAYER | CMP | ATT | YDS | CMP% | AVG | TD | INT | RTG | SACK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N. VedralQB | 180 | 303 | 1813 | 59.4 | 6.0 | 7 | 7 | 112.7 | — |
| E. SimonQB | 16 | 28 | 145 | 57.1 | 5.2 | 0 | 1 | 93.5 | — |
| C. SnyderQB | 18 | 28 | 130 | 64.3 | 4.6 | 1 | 0 | 115.1 | — |
| J. LanganTE | 6 | 9 | 68 | 66.7 | 7.6 | 1 | 0 | 166.8 | — |
| G. WimsattQB | 9 | 21 | 45 | 42.9 | 2.1 | 0 | 2 | 41.8 | — |
| I. WashingtonWR | 1 | 2 | 27 | 50.0 | 13.5 | 0 | 0 | 163.4 | — |
| I. PachecoRB | 1 | 1 | 1 | 100.0 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 108.4 | — |
| K. MonangaiRB | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | — |
| M. AlaimoTE | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 231 | 394 | 2,229 | 58.6 | 5.7 | 9 | 10 | 108.6 | 0 |
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Rushing
| PLAYER | CAR | YDS | AVG | LNG | TD | FUM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I. PachecoRB | 167 | 647 | 3.9 | 26 | 5 | — |
| N. VedralQB | 102 | 297 | 2.9 | 33 | 2 | — |
| K. MonangaiRB | 62 | 235 | 3.8 | 20 | 4 | — |
| A. YoungRB | 56 | 205 | 3.7 | 12 | 5 | — |
| J. LanganTE | 34 | 109 | 3.2 | 13 | 3 | — |
| J. Wright-CollinsLB | 15 | 95 | 6.3 | 21 | 0 | — |
| G. WimsattQB | 9 | 68 | 7.6 | 32 | 0 | — |
| B. MeltonWR | 9 | 51 | 5.7 | 13 | 0 | — |
| C. SnyderQB | 15 | 42 | 2.8 | 9 | 0 | — |
| A. CruickshankWR | 6 | 30 | 5.0 | 14 | 0 | — |
| S. JonesWR | 3 | 14 | 4.7 | 7 | 0 | — |
| B. SandersWR | 3 | 12 | 4.0 | 8 | 0 | — |
| C. DremelWR | 1 | 8 | 8.0 | 8 | 0 | — |
| R. O'NealOL | 1 | 7 | 7.0 | 7 | 1 | — |
| E. SimonQB | 8 | 6 | 0.8 | 11 | 0 | — |
| P. DayRB | 2 | 6 | 3.0 | 4 | 0 | — |
| I. WashingtonWR | 1 | -5 | -5.0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| A. KorsakP | 1 | -8 | -8.0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 495 | 1,819 | 3.7 | 33 | 20 | 0 |
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Receiving
| PLAYER | REC | YDS | AVG | LNG | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B. MeltonWR | 55 | 618 | 11.2 | 57 | 3 |
| S. JonesWR | 35 | 334 | 9.5 | 31 | 0 |
| A. CruickshankWR | 20 | 244 | 12.2 | 75 | 2 |
| B. SandersWR | 16 | 183 | 11.4 | 62 | 1 |
| I. WashingtonWR | 19 | 179 | 9.4 | 33 | 0 |
| J. LanganTE | 18 | 177 | 9.8 | 27 | 0 |
| J. HaskinsTE | 11 | 141 | 12.8 | 30 | 1 |
| A. YoungRB | 12 | 75 | 6.3 | 21 | 1 |
| K. MonangaiRB | 10 | 68 | 6.8 | 17 | 0 |
| J. YoungbloodWR | 6 | 52 | 8.7 | 15 | 1 |
| V. KonopkaTE | 4 | 52 | 13.0 | 20 | 0 |
| M. AlaimoTE | 5 | 50 | 10.0 | 17 | 0 |
| I. PachecoRB | 13 | 25 | 1.9 | 11 | 0 |
| J. Wright-CollinsLB | 5 | 23 | 4.6 | 10 | 0 |
| C. DremelWR | 2 | 8 | 4.0 | 4 | 0 |
| TEAM TOTALS | 231 | 2,229 | 9.6 | 75 | 9 |
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Defense
| PLAYER | TOT | SOLO | AST | TFL | SACK | INT | PD | FF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| O. FatukasiLB | 81 | 50 | — | 11.0 | 3.5 | — | 2 | — |
| C. IzienDB | 69 | 49 | — | 8.0 | 0 | — | 4 | — |
| A. YoungDB | 66 | 41 | — | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | — |
| D. SingletonLB | 55 | 28 | — | 4.5 | 0.5 | — | 0 | — |
| T. FoggLB | 53 | 26 | — | 2.5 | 1 | — | 0 | — |
| M. ToureLB | 51 | 24 | — | 8.0 | 4.5 | — | 0 | — |
| K. AbrahamDB | 43 | 32 | — | 3 | 0 | — | 10 | — |
| J. TurnerDL | 38 | 18 | — | 5.5 | 2.5 | — | 1 | — |
| T. AveryDB | 34 | 20 | — | 1.5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | — |
| R. LongerbeamDB | 31 | 22 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 9 | — |
| A. LewisDL | 30 | 12 | — | 3.0 | 2.5 | — | 0 | — |
| M. MeltonDB | 28 | 20 | — | 2.0 | 0 | 3 | 5 | — |
| C. OnyechiDL | 27 | 17 | — | 2.5 | 1 | — | 0 | — |
| T. Maddox-WilliamsLB | 22 | 17 | — | 2.5 | 0 | — | 2 | — |
| K. HamiltonDL | 21 | 9 | — | 2.5 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| I. MaijehDL | 20 | 10 | — | 3 | 1.5 | — | 1 | — |
| A. YoungRB | 19 | 8 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| M. AhanotuDL | 19 | 3 | — | 2.5 | 1 | — | 0 | — |
| T. PowellLB | 18 | 11 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — |
| M. TverdovDL | 14 | 9 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| D. IgbinosunDB | 13 | 6 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — |
| L. StevensDB | 10 | 7 | — | 0.5 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. KromahDL | 9 | 3 | — | 2.5 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| W. BaileyDL | 7 | 2 | — | 1.5 | 1 | — | 1 | — |
| N. JonesDB | 6 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| S. LoyalDB | 6 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| J. LusardiDB | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| P. ReneDB | 5 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| R. BattleLB | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| C. StewartLB | 4 | 3 | — | 0.5 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| A. ClarkDB | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — |
| D. JenningsLB | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. Wright-CollinsLB | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| A. CruickshankWR | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| C. LongWR | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| E. MackDB | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| I. PachecoRB | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| K. MonangaiRB | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| S. JonesWR | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| A. TaffeDB | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| B. TaylorLS | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| D. NwaogwugwuOL | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. YoungbloodWR | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| K. ReidDB | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| K. GriffinDL | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| N. KriminOL | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| R. KongaDL | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 838 | 483 | 0 | 73 | 22 | 7 | 45 | 0 |
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Kicking & Scoring
| PLAYER | FGM | FGA | FG% | XPM | XPA | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V. AmbrosioPK | 12 | 16 | — | 30 | 30 | 66 |
| TEAM TOTALS | 12 | 16 | 75.0 | 30 | 30 | 66 |
TEAM NEWS + STATTAKE ARTICLES
ALL CFB NEWS →Latest Rutgers coverage
NATIONAL UPDATE
2026 College Football Coaching Hot Seat: Ranking Top 7 CFB Coaches Likeliest to Be…
2026 College Football Coaching Hot Seat: Ranking Top 7 CFB Coaches Likeliest to Be Fired. Week 3 of the 2026 college football season delivered a matchup between two head coaches on the hot seat, with […] As we now turn our focus to another week, there are still plenty of prominent coaches sitting on warm seats right now. Let's dive into our rankings for head coaches on the college football coaching hot seat entering Week 4. Key points from the original article: 1. Greg Schiano, Rutgers Scarlet Knights 2. Mike Norvell, Florida State Seminoles 3. Dave Doeren, NC State Wolfpack 4. Bill Belichick, North Carolina Tar Heels 5. Lance Leipold, Kansas Jayhawks 6. Luke Fickell, Wisconsin Badgers 7. Dave Aranda, Baylor Bears
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATECollege fantasy football Week 4 rankings: QB, RB, WR, TE and FLEX.
College fantasy football Week 4 rankings: QB, RB, WR, TE and FLEX. Michael Hawkins, Nate Sheppard and KJ Duff lead rankings built on production and matchups.
READ UPDATE →STATTAKEIs USC No. 12 Because Voters Watched the Record, Not Rutgers?
The Trojans are 4–0. They also beat an 0–3 Rutgers team by seven while losing the second half by 80 yards. Both facts have to matter.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEBig Ten football power rankings after Week 3 - USC craters at Rutgers.
Big Ten football power rankings after Week 3 - USC craters at Rutgers. USC fell several spots in the Big Ten rankings after a brutally ugly and undisciplined win over Rutgers The top teams in the Big Ten held serve in Week 3, while USC football fell a few spots in the rankings. The Trojans did not prove they are a different team this season, allowing Rutgers to hang with them. Key points from the original article: 1. Indiana Hoosiers (3-0) 2. Ohio State Buckeyes (2-1) 3. Oregon Ducks (2-1) 4. Penn State Nittany Lions (3-0) 5. USC Trojans (4-0) 6. UCLA Bruins (3-0) 7. Michigan Wolverines (3-0) 8. Iowa Hawkeyes (3-0) 9. Washington Huskies (3-0) 10. Wisconsin Badgers (2-1) 11. Illinois Fighting Illini (2-1) 12. Minnesota Golden Gophers (2-1) 13. Nebraska Cornhuskers (3-0) 14. Northwestern Wildcats (2-0) 15. Maryland Terrapins (2-1) 16. Michigan State Spartans (2-1) 17. Purdue Boilermakers (1-2) 18. Rutgers Scarlet Knights (0-3)
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEThe start of conference play shakes things up a little.
The start of conference play shakes things up a little. It would have been funnier if both had lost, because then Rutgers and Purdue would be atop the conference. If you fell into a coma in 2021 after Purdue won the Music City Bowl and woke up today you wouldn't believe me if I told you: USC, UCLA, Washington, and Oregon are all in the Big Ten. Indiana is the defending National Champion in football Purdue has played in a Big Ten title game It has won fewer games (7) in the three years since that season when it won eight games. That's just Big Ten football, let alone the rest of the world.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATE‘Horrible Idea,’ ‘This Guy Sucks’ — CFB Fans Make Feelings Clear on Rumors of Bria…
‘Horrible Idea,’ ‘This Guy Sucks’ — CFB Fans Make Feelings Clear on Rumors of Brian Kelly’s Interest in Becoming Rutgers HC. If Brian Kelly really wants back into college coaching, one of the sport’s strangest possible reunions with the Northeast is already being floated. The Rutgers Scarlet Knights have not fired Greg Schiano.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATERutgers football news: Scarlet Knights get massive Lonergan injury update for USC…
Rutgers football news: Scarlet Knights get massive Lonergan injury update for USC game. The Rutgers football program entered the early part of the 2026 season seeking answers after suffering back-to-back non-conference losses. This challenging start was exacerbated by poor offensive performances and an undisclosed injury to starting quarterback Dylan Lonergan . He injured himself late in the Week 1 upset against UMass and missed the […] The post Rutgers football news: Scarlet Knights get massive Lonergan injury update for USC game appeared first on ClutchPoints.
READ UPDATE →ROSTER BUILDING
RECRUITING HUB →Recruiting & development
Recruiting to production
See how efficiently signed talent develops into starts, impact and wins.
What transfers added
Separate returning development from incoming and outgoing portal value.
PROGRAM CONTEXT
TEAM TRENDS →History & trends
Wins, efficiency and schedule strength in one timeline.
Home, road, favorite and underdog performance.
Recent form versus the long-term series story.
Drafted players by position and development path.
Iowa