Old Dominion
Kennesaw State
Illinois
Iowa
Oregon
Michigan State
UCLA
Maryland
Penn State
Wisconsin
Purdue
Ohio State
Alabama
MiamiFour-year talent direction
Track class strength, position balance and roster needs across signing cycles.
STATTAKE DATABASEFIND ANY TEAM OR PLAYER
Big Ten • FBS TEAM DATABASE
Indiana
Complete schedules, team production, player statistics, news, analytics, recruiting and program history in one fan destination.
2025 SEASON DATABASE
Indiana football
Record: 16–0 (Schedule & Results)
Conference: Big Ten
Players: 59
Points For: 666
Points/Game: 41.6
Points Against: 187
Opp. Points/Game: 11.7
2025 SEASON
LIVE SCOREBOARD →Schedule & results
OFFICIAL SCHEDULE FEEDOpponent names and logos open team pages. Dates and results open StatTake box scores.
WEEKOPPONENTLOCATIONGAME
WEEK 5BYE——
WEEK 12BYE——
POSTSEASONBOWL & PLAYOFF GAMES
TEAM PRODUCTION
Team stats
Season totals organized for quick comparison. Swipe horizontally for more.
2025 SEASON TOTALS
ALL GAMESOffense at a glance
| PASS CMP | PASS ATT | PASS YDS | PASS % | PASS AVG | PASS TD | PASS INT | PASS RTG | SACK | RUSH ATT | RUSH YDS | RUSH AVG | RUSH TD | REC | REC YDS | REC AVG | REC TD | PTS/G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 292 | 404 | 3,826 | 72.3 | 9.5 | 46 | 7 | 185.9 | 0 | 641 | 3,487 | 5.4 | 35 | 292 | 3,826 | 13.1 | 46 | 41.6 |
TEAM ANALYTICS CENTER
OPEN NATIONAL ANALYTICS →Indiana analytics
LOADING 2025 EPA METRICS
The verified team snapshot is loading now.
2025 COMPLETE TEAM ROSTER
PLAYER PROFILES →Individual player statistics
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Passing
| PLAYER | CMP | ATT | YDS | CMP% | AVG | TD | INT | RTG | SACK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F. MendozaQB | 273 | 379 | 3535 | 72.0 | 9.3 | 41 | 6 | 182.9 | — |
| A. MendozaQB | 18 | 24 | 286 | 75.0 | 11.9 | 5 | 1 | 235.5 | — |
| G. WilsonQB | 1 | 1 | 5 | 100.0 | 5.0 | 0 | 0 | 142.0 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 292 | 404 | 3,826 | 72.3 | 9.5 | 46 | 7 | 185.9 | 0 |
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Rushing
| PLAYER | CAR | YDS | AVG | LNG | TD | FUM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R. HembyRB | 230 | 1120 | 4.9 | 82 | 7 | — |
| K. BlackRB | 187 | 1039 | 5.6 | 40 | 10 | — |
| K. MartinRB | 77 | 506 | 6.6 | 36 | 6 | — |
| F. MendozaQB | 90 | 276 | 3.1 | 21 | 7 | — |
| L. Beebe Jr.RB | 27 | 209 | 7.7 | 24 | 1 | — |
| A. MendozaQB | 13 | 190 | 14.6 | 58 | 1 | — |
| O. Cooper Jr.WR | 3 | 74 | 24.7 | 75 | 1 | — |
| S. VanhorseRB | 9 | 48 | 5.3 | 12 | 0 | — |
| S. CuonoRB | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 9 | 0 | — |
| G. WilsonQB | 1 | 6 | 6.0 | 6 | 0 | — |
| R. NowakowskiTE | 2 | 2 | 1.0 | 1 | 2 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 641 | 3,487 | 5.4 | 82 | 35 | 0 |
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Receiving
| PLAYER | REC | YDS | AVG | LNG | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| O. Cooper Jr.WR | 70 | 961 | 13.7 | 58 | 13 |
| E. SarrattWR | 64 | 806 | 12.6 | 49 | 15 |
| C. BeckerWR | 34 | 679 | 20.0 | 53 | 4 |
| E. Williams Jr.WR | 36 | 438 | 12.2 | 62 | 6 |
| R. NowakowskiTE | 32 | 387 | 12.1 | 43 | 2 |
| R. HembyRB | 17 | 165 | 9.7 | 26 | 0 |
| J. BradyWR | 14 | 115 | 8.2 | 16 | 3 |
| D. ChandlerWR | 1 | 65 | 65.0 | 65 | 1 |
| H. StaesTE | 7 | 62 | 8.9 | 18 | 2 |
| L. BondWR | 5 | 49 | 9.8 | 14 | 0 |
| K. BlackRB | 4 | 36 | 9.0 | 11 | 0 |
| J. WasserstromWR | 2 | 21 | 10.5 | 17 | 0 |
| M. JacksonWR | 3 | 15 | 5.0 | 6 | 0 |
| K. MartinRB | 1 | 14 | 14.0 | 14 | 0 |
| L. Beebe Jr.RB | 1 | 7 | 7.0 | 7 | 0 |
| D. PondsDB | 1 | 6 | 6.0 | 6 | 0 |
| TEAM TOTALS | 292 | 3,826 | 13.1 | 65 | 46 |
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Defense
| PLAYER | TOT | SOLO | AST | TFL | SACK | INT | PD | FF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R. HardyLB | 103 | 48 | — | 15.0 | 8 | — | 5 | — |
| A. FisherLB | 95 | 46 | — | 10.5 | 4.5 | 2 | 1 | — |
| L. MooreDB | 90 | 45 | — | 2.5 | 0 | 5 | 3 | — |
| I. JonesLB | 78 | 38 | — | 14.5 | 7.0 | 1 | 2 | — |
| D. PondsDB | 60 | 43 | — | 4.0 | 0 | 2 | 10 | — |
| D. BoykinDB | 60 | 37 | — | 6 | 1 | 2 | 5 | — |
| J. SharpeDB | 49 | 36 | — | 5.0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | — |
| A. FerrellDB | 48 | 26 | — | 2 | 0 | 4 | 6 | — |
| T. TuckerDL | 38 | 17 | — | 11.5 | 6.0 | — | 2 | — |
| S. DaleyDL | 35 | 24 | — | 19.0 | 5.5 | — | 0 | — |
| M. KamaraDL | 34 | 12 | — | 7.5 | 2 | — | 1 | — |
| M. LandinoDL | 32 | 14 | — | 6.5 | 5 | — | 4 | — |
| H. WheelerDL | 31 | 13 | — | 4.0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| K. WyattDL | 28 | 12 | — | 8.5 | 2.5 | — | 0 | — |
| J. UtzingerLB | 16 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| D. NdukweDL | 14 | 8 | — | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | — |
| D. RatcliffDL | 13 | 8 | — | 5.0 | 1.5 | — | 0 | — |
| B. Baldwin Jr.DB | 11 | 6 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| R. GandyDB | 11 | 10 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| K. TurnerLB | 10 | 4 | — | 0.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — |
| J. Jah BoydDB | 8 | 7 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| C. BeckerWR | 7 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| A. TurvyDL | 6 | 1 | — | 0.5 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| A. ChungDB | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 3 | — |
| J. BellDB | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| C. ConnerDB | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| Q. ClarkDL | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. MonetteDL | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| A. DePaepeDL | 2 | 0 | — | 0.5 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| W. DePaepeDL | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — |
| A. KnightenDB | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| C. SmithOL | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| F. MendozaQB | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| G. ReeseDB | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. WasserstromWR | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| K. BlackRB | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| M. LangstonLS | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| M. McCarthyP | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| P. CooganOL | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| R. NowakowskiTE | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| T. Burrus Jr.DL | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| E. Williams Jr.WR | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | — | — |
| J. BradyWR | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 914 | 484 | 0 | 129 | 46 | 19 | 47 | 0 |
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Kicking & Scoring
| PLAYER | FGM | FGA | FG% | XPM | XPA | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N. RadicicPK | 17 | 18 | — | 87 | 87 | 138 |
| B. FrankePK | 2 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| TEAM TOTALS | 19 | 21 | 90.5 | 87 | 87 | 144 |
TEAM NEWS + STATTAKE ARTICLES
ALL CFB NEWS →Latest Indiana coverage
NATIONAL UPDATE
College Football 5 Thoughts: Iowa's CFP Case, Indiana's Schedule, and Is the Heism…
College Football 5 Thoughts: Iowa's CFP Case, Indiana's Schedule, and Is the Heisman Race Over?. After the biggest weekend of the season, is Iowa really a College Football Playoff team? What now for the Heisman, and what's the quirk in Indiana's schedule?
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEPrince goes crazy with 99-yard TD run, but Indiana State loses to Salukis.
Prince goes crazy with 99-yard TD run, but Indiana State loses to Salukis. No purple rain fell from the sky and nobody drove a little red Corvette. But Indiana State's Prince — redshirt junior running back Zechariah Prince, to be specific — dazzled the Memorial Stadium crowd with a school-record touchdown run of 99 yards early in the fourth quarter Saturday night. Unfortunately for the Sycamores, that couldn't overcome a succession of quarterback injuries and three ...
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATECollege football odds, lines, schedule for Week 11: LSU, Indiana open as favorites…
College football odds, lines, schedule for Week 11: LSU, Indiana open as favorites in key conference battles. Indiana hosts USC in a pivotal Big Ten clash while Georgia, LSU and unbeaten Utah navigate tricky conference tests as the playoff race heats up Week 11 of the college football season doesn't carry the same curb appeal as Week 10 in terms of ranked vs. ranked matchups. But it is nonetheless littered with challenging games for College Football Playoff hopefuls and national championship contenders. Key points from the original article: • The big games • Best of the rest
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEUSC: Top 10 games for Week 11 of the college football season.
USC-Indiana, LSU-Texas and Wake Forest-SMU highlight the top 10 games of Week 11 of the college football season. There are only three weeks left in the college football regular season, and there are a lot of important games still to be played. Week 11 includes four top 25 games, according to the AP Poll rankings. It’s a big week in the ACC, and there are potential upsets in the other major conferences. Key points from the original article: 1. USC at Indiana 2. Texas at LSU 3. Wake Forest at SMU 4. Utah at Arizona 5. Missouri at Georgia 6. Texas Tech at Oklahoma State 7. Duke at Miami 8. Northwestern at Ohio State 9. Illinois at UCLA 10. Baylor at BYU
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEMiami: Where: Notre Dame Stadium, South Bend, Indiana TV: NBC Coaches: Mario Crist…
Where: Notre Dame Stadium, South Bend, Indiana TV: NBC Coaches: Mario Cristobal is 43-19 at UM, 105-79 overall; Notre Dame’s Marcus... Line: Notre Dame is favored by 7.5 points Weather: 42 degrees, 9% chance of rain However, the Hurricanes suffered a big blow during the week, losing star wide receiver Malachi Toney to injury for the foreseeable future. About No. 1 Miami (8-0, 6-0 ACC): The Hurricanes narrowly escaped Chapel Hill with a win. The offense has been clicking, but the defense has been scuffling. Miami is working to correct the issues on defense before facing Notre Dame. Notre Dame does not have a win over a currently ranked opponent, and the playoff committee ranked it 11th.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEIndiana: ‘Other Coaches Are Scared To Say,’ ‘ They Don’t Even Try To Hide the Bias…
‘Other Coaches Are Scared To Say,’ ‘ They Don’t Even Try To Hide the Bias’ — Fans Back Curt Cignetti for Calling Out CFP Rankings, ESPN’s SEC Favoritism. Indiana is No. 4 in the first College Football Playoff rankings, and its coach, Curt Cignetti, thinks ESPN’s fondness for the SEC explains why that conference has so many teams on the board.
READ UPDATE →STATTAKEIs Indiana Already Better Than Last Year’s National Champion?
The opponents have not been strong enough to settle the argument. The Hoosiers’ balance, quarterback efficiency and defensive control are strong enough to make it a real one.
READ UPDATE →FEATURED ANALYSISSeven Teams Have 11-1 Title Odds. Only Three Were Top-12 on Both Sides.
The betting market sees a seven-team championship tier. StatTake’s 2025 efficiency data draws a sharper line around Ohio State, Oregon and Indiana—and exposes the different bets being made on Texas, Notre Dame, Georgia and Miami.
READ UPDATE →ROSTER BUILDING
RECRUITING HUB →Recruiting & development
Recruiting to production
See how efficiently signed talent develops into starts, impact and wins.
What transfers added
Separate returning development from incoming and outgoing portal value.
PROGRAM CONTEXT
TEAM TRENDS →History & trends
Wins, efficiency and schedule strength in one timeline.
Home, road, favorite and underdog performance.
Recent form versus the long-term series story.
Drafted players by position and development path.
Michigan
Minnesota