Four-year talent direction
Track class strength, position balance and roster needs across signing cycles.

Complete schedules, team production, player statistics, news, analytics, recruiting and program history in one fan destination.
Record: 10–4 (Schedule & Results)
Conference: Big 12
Players: 62
Points For: 541
Points/Game: 38.6
Points Against: 300
Opp. Points/Game: 21.4
Season totals organized for quick comparison. Swipe horizontally for more.
| PASS CMP | PASS ATT | PASS YDS | PASS % | PASS AVG | PASS TD | PASS INT | PASS RTG | SACK | RUSH ATT | RUSH YDS | RUSH AVG | RUSH TD | REC | REC YDS | REC AVG | REC TD | PTS/G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 288 | 444 | 3,489 | 64.9 | 7.9 | 31 | 10 | 149.4 | 0 | 556 | 3,054 | 5.5 | 38 | 288 | 3,489 | 12.1 | 31 | 38.6 |
The verified team snapshot is loading now.
| PLAYER | CMP | ATT | YDS | CMP% | AVG | TD | INT | RTG | SACK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. RisingQB | 249 | 385 | 3034 | 64.7 | 7.9 | 26 | 8 | 149.0 | — |
| B. BarnesQB | 37 | 57 | 430 | 64.9 | 7.5 | 4 | 2 | 144.4 | — |
| N. JohnsonRB | 1 | 1 | 16 | 100.0 | 16.0 | 1 | 0 | 564.4 | — |
| D. VeleWR | 1 | 1 | 9 | 100.0 | 9.0 | 0 | 0 | 175.6 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 288 | 444 | 3,489 | 64.9 | 7.9 | 31 | 10 | 149.4 | 0 |
| PLAYER | CAR | YDS | AVG | LNG | TD | FUM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T. ThomasRB | 142 | 687 | 4.8 | 36 | 7 | — |
| M. BernardRB | 106 | 533 | 5.0 | 36 | 4 | — |
| J. JacksonRB | 78 | 531 | 6.8 | 66 | 9 | — |
| C. RisingQB | 77 | 466 | 6.1 | 29 | 6 | — |
| J. GloverRB | 78 | 360 | 4.6 | 29 | 4 | — |
| J. DixonWR | 10 | 118 | 11.8 | 22 | 4 | — |
| B. BarnesQB | 20 | 116 | 5.8 | 32 | 0 | — |
| C. CurryRB | 12 | 81 | 6.8 | 24 | 1 | — |
| C. VincentRB | 17 | 60 | 3.5 | 12 | 1 | — |
| N. JohnsonRB | 5 | 51 | 10.2 | 21 | 2 | — |
| M. ParksWR | 6 | 36 | 6.0 | 13 | 0 | — |
| J. BouwmeesterP | 1 | 14 | 14.0 | 14 | 0 | — |
| K. BillsOL | 0 | 5 | — | 5 | 0 | — |
| T. GilmoreWR | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 6 | 0 | — |
| D. VeleWR | 2 | -4 | -2.0 | 5 | 0 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 556 | 3,054 | 5.5 | 66 | 38 | 0 |
| PLAYER | REC | YDS | AVG | LNG | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D. KincaidTE | 70 | 890 | 12.7 | 37 | 8 |
| D. VeleWR | 55 | 695 | 12.6 | 47 | 5 |
| M. ParksWR | 26 | 414 | 15.9 | 57 | 2 |
| J. DixonWR | 33 | 344 | 10.4 | 31 | 3 |
| M. BernardRB | 34 | 314 | 9.2 | 29 | 1 |
| T. YassminTE | 13 | 301 | 23.2 | 72 | 6 |
| B. KuitheTE | 19 | 206 | 10.8 | 37 | 3 |
| S. EnisWR | 12 | 101 | 8.4 | 16 | 1 |
| M. CopeWR | 7 | 75 | 10.7 | 21 | 1 |
| L. KendallTE | 5 | 43 | 8.6 | 16 | 1 |
| T. ThomasRB | 6 | 43 | 7.2 | 18 | 0 |
| M. McClainWR | 2 | 18 | 9.0 | 12 | 0 |
| T. PututauTE | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 13 | 0 |
| C. RisingQB | 1 | 9 | 9.0 | 9 | 0 |
| J. JacksonRB | 1 | 8 | 8.0 | 8 | 0 |
| J. GloverRB | 1 | 6 | 6.0 | 6 | 0 |
| N. JohnsonRB | 1 | 5 | 5.0 | 5 | 0 |
| TEAM TOTALS | 288 | 3,489 | 12.1 | 72 | 31 |
| PLAYER | TOT | SOLO | AST | TFL | SACK | INT | PD | FF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. BishopS | 68 | 36 | — | 6.0 | 1.5 | 1 | 3 | — |
| R. HubertS | 66 | 48 | — | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 | — |
| K. ReidLB | 65 | 33 | — | 8.5 | 5.0 | 1 | 3 | — |
| M. DiabateLB | 46 | 23 | — | 11.5 | 5.0 | — | 1 | — |
| J. BroughtonCB | 39 | 28 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | — |
| L. BartonLB | 37 | 21 | — | 5.5 | 4.5 | — | 1 | — |
| G. ReidDE | 36 | 22 | — | 9.0 | 5.5 | — | 1 | — |
| C. O'TooleDE | 33 | 18 | — | 3.5 | 1.5 | — | 1 | — |
| J. TafunaDT | 27 | 15 | — | 3.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | — |
| J. EllissDE | 26 | 15 | — | 6.0 | 3.0 | — | 0 | — |
| S. VakiS | 26 | 22 | — | 2.5 | 0 | — | 3 | — |
| S. PepaDL | 25 | 11 | — | 6.0 | 4 | — | 2 | — |
| C. Phillips IIICB | 23 | 15 | — | 2 | 1 | 6 | 6 | — |
| V. FillingerDE | 18 | 10 | — | 5.0 | 5.0 | — | 0 | — |
| Z. VaughnCB | 18 | 13 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 9 | — |
| C. IsbellS | 16 | 11 | — | 0.5 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| A. VimahiDT | 13 | 4 | — | 2.0 | 1 | — | 0 | — |
| M. SuguturagaTE | 12 | 7 | — | 1.5 | 1 | — | 1 | — |
| H. FureyLB | 10 | 8 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| B. ReevesS | 7 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| A. Mata'afaLB | 6 | 3 | — | 0.5 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| K. TanuvasaDT | 6 | 3 | — | 1.5 | 1 | — | 1 | — |
| M. MataeleCB | 6 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| T. YassminTE | 6 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| C. SavageDB | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| C. VincentRB | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. PearsonLB | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| L. LangiLB | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| E. CalvertLB | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. ReddingPK | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| L. CaldarellaWR | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| D. KaufusiDT | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| F. PututauDT | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| M. ParksWR | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| T. PututauDT | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| D. KincaidTE | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| F. MarksCB | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. GloverRB | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. GreepLS | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. MedlockLB | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| K. BillsOL | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| S. EnisWR | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| T. ThomasRB | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| T. WegisDE | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| E. DavisCB | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| K. LawlerCB | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 679 | 399 | 0 | 82 | 41 | 12 | 39 | 0 |
| PLAYER | FGM | FGA | FG% | XPM | XPA | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J. NoyesPK | 6 | 8 | — | 34 | 34 | 52 |
| J. ReddingPK | 4 | 6 | — | 35 | 36 | 47 |
| TEAM TOTALS | 10 | 14 | 71.4 | 69 | 70 | 99 |
Utah Utes Move Up in Latest AP Top 25 College Football Poll. Dominating the Holy War and capitalized on national upsets, the unbeaten Utes climbed to second while eyeing a top-seed playoff run behind a stifling defensive identity.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEWayshawn Parker gets positive update after injury scare during Utah/BYU game. Utah football lifted its record to 9-0 for the first time since 2008 by beating BYU 28-20 . But Utes fans received one scare involving star running back Wayshawn Parker. Which left fans hoping for good news nearly 24 hours after beating their fiercest rival.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEArizona to host FOX’s Big Noon Kickoff morning show ahead of matchup with Utah. This biggest game of the Brent Brennan era just got even bigger. Arizona is set to host Utah on Saturday for a ranked Big 12 matchup. The Wildcats (7-2, 4-2 Big 12) moved back up to No.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEFormer Florida State quarterback Danny Kanell revealed his updated Top 12 teams in the country following Week 10. With a No. 1 team going down, there were of course some changes once again! Miami fell to Notre Dame but neither dropped out of Kanell’s rankings this week. In fact, they are both in a good position. Key points from the original article: 1. Utah 2. UCLA 3. Georgia 4. Notre Dame 5. Indiana 6. Miami 7. Wake Forest 8. Texas 9. Tennessee 10. Alabama 11. Texas Tech 12. USC
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEApproaching the unofficial halfway point of the college football season, ESPN continues to update its FPI rankings after every result. The Week 10 schedule was loaded with big-time games and season-altering results for the top teams, setting up big movement in ESPN' FPI rankings. Unlike the polls which will follow on Sunday afternoon, this positions each team based on a set of computer numbers which track the best teams in college football. During the Week 10 slate, there were plenty results which impact how the numbers will shift, including an in-state rivalry showdown between BYU and Utah. Key points from the original article: 1. Notre Dame (8-1): 2. Georgia (8-1): 3. Alabama (7-2): 4. Miami (8-1): 5. Ohio State (6-3): 6. Texas (7-2): 7. LSU (6-3): 8. Indiana (8-1): 9. Oregon (6-3): 10. Utah (9-0): 11. Tennessee (7-2): 12. Ole Miss (6-3): 13. Wake Forest (8-1): 14. Texas Tech (8-1): 15. Louisville (6-3): 16. USC (7-2): 17. BYU (7-2): 18. Iowa (7-2): 19. South Carolina (6-3): 20. Houston (7-2): 21. Oklahoma State (6-3): 22. Oklahoma (5-4): 23. Nebraska (5-4): 24. Missouri (6-3):
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEThe coaches poll has been released after a loaded Week 10 of college football, and a new team sits atop the rankings. A jam-packed Week 10 lived up to the billing with a number of ranked games across college football. But the biggest result came in South Bend as No. 1 Notre Dame held on for the 31-24 victory at Notre Dame Stadium to hand Miami its first loss of the season. Key points from the original article: 1. Georgia 2. Utah 3. Notre Dame 4. UCLA 5. Indiana 6. Miami 7. Alabama 8. Texas 9. Tennessee 10. Texas Tech 11. Wake Forest 12. BYU 13. Kentucky 14. USC 15. Iowa 16. Houston 17. Ole Miss 18. Boise State 19. Oregon 20. Ohio State 21. Arizona 22. LSU 23. SMU 24. South Carolina 25. New Mexico
READ UPDATE →STATTAKEUtah’s opener was spectacular. But Arkansas changed 81 players, making last season’s 10-loss team a misleading baseline for the matchup.
READ UPDATE →BIG 12 SEASON PREVIEWThe Big 12’s reputation says chaos. Its 2025 data says Texas Tech and Utah created clear separation, BYU owns the best continuity challenge, and Houston’s 10 wins may be more fragile than its preseason ranking.
READ UPDATE →Track class strength, position balance and roster needs across signing cycles.
See how efficiently signed talent develops into starts, impact and wins.
Separate returning development from incoming and outgoing portal value.
Wins, efficiency and schedule strength in one timeline.
Home, road, favorite and underdog performance.
Recent form versus the long-term series story.
Drafted players by position and development path.