Four-year talent direction
Track class strength, position balance and roster needs across signing cycles.

Complete schedules, team production, player statistics, news, analytics, recruiting and program history in one fan destination.
Record: 8–1 (Schedule & Results)
Conference: Independent
Players: 65
Points For: 354
Points/Game: 39.3
Points Against: 131
Opp. Points/Game: 14.6
Season totals organized for quick comparison. Swipe horizontally for more.
| PASS CMP | PASS ATT | PASS YDS | PASS % | PASS AVG | PASS TD | PASS INT | PASS RTG | SACK | RUSH ATT | RUSH YDS | RUSH AVG | RUSH TD | REC | REC YDS | REC AVG | REC TD | PTS/G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 194 | 287 | 2,373 | 67.6 | 8.3 | 22 | 1 | 161.6 | 0 | 310 | 1,595 | 5.1 | 21 | 194 | 2,373 | 12.2 | 22 | 39.3 |
The verified team snapshot is loading now.
| PLAYER | CMP | ATT | YDS | CMP% | AVG | TD | INT | RTG | SACK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. CarrQB | 177 | 262 | 2168 | 67.6 | 8.3 | 21 | 1 | 162.8 | — |
| N. GrubbsQB | 15 | 23 | 176 | 65.2 | 7.7 | 1 | 0 | 143.8 | — |
| T. JarrardQB | 2 | 2 | 29 | 100.0 | 14.5 | 0 | 0 | 221.8 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 194 | 287 | 2,373 | 67.6 | 8.3 | 22 | 1 | 161.6 | 0 |
| PLAYER | CAR | YDS | AVG | LNG | TD | FUM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N. James Jr.RB | 106 | 571 | 5.4 | 52 | 9 | — |
| J. WaltonRB | 79 | 514 | 6.5 | 97 | 4 | — |
| A. WilliamsRB | 73 | 333 | 4.6 | 28 | 4 | — |
| C. CarrQB | 26 | 89 | 3.4 | 14 | 3 | — |
| K. YoungRB | 13 | 42 | 3.2 | 6 | 0 | — |
| J. OsborneRB | 12 | 35 | 2.9 | 13 | 1 | — |
| B. RobinsonWR | 1 | 11 | 11.0 | 11 | 0 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 310 | 1,595 | 5.1 | 97 | 21 | 0 |
| PLAYER | REC | YDS | AVG | LNG | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J. FaisonWR | 44 | 574 | 13.0 | 39 | 5 |
| M. GilbertWR | 33 | 528 | 16.0 | 61 | 5 |
| J. GreathouseWR | 23 | 308 | 13.4 | 38 | 2 |
| J. Bettis Jr.WR | 10 | 170 | 17.0 | 56 | 1 |
| N. James Jr.RB | 14 | 141 | 10.1 | 36 | 3 |
| A. WilliamsRB | 11 | 123 | 11.2 | 70 | 1 |
| J. WaltonRB | 8 | 96 | 12.0 | 16 | 0 |
| J. LarsenTE | 9 | 74 | 8.2 | 21 | 0 |
| M. GrahamWR | 8 | 69 | 8.6 | 20 | 0 |
| E. BurressWR | 4 | 63 | 15.8 | 30 | 1 |
| C. FlanaganTE | 6 | 48 | 8.0 | 27 | 2 |
| M. JefferyWR | 4 | 37 | 9.3 | 18 | 1 |
| L. SaldateWR | 3 | 36 | 12.0 | 21 | 0 |
| I. PremerTE | 3 | 26 | 8.7 | 14 | 0 |
| J. FlaniganTE | 6 | 26 | 4.3 | 9 | 1 |
| D. FitzgeraldWR | 2 | 25 | 12.5 | 20 | 0 |
| K. YoungRB | 2 | 19 | 9.5 | 11 | 0 |
| T. WashingtonTE | 3 | 15 | 5.0 | 6 | 0 |
| C. CarrQB | 1 | -5 | -5.0 | 0 | 0 |
| TEAM TOTALS | 194 | 2,373 | 12.2 | 70 | 22 |
| PLAYER | TOT | SOLO | AST | TFL | SACK | INT | PD | FF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D. BowenLB | 45 | 24 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 2 | — |
| L. TalichS | 43 | 31 | — | 4.5 | 1 | 3 | 2 | — |
| A. ShulerS | 42 | 23 | — | 2.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — |
| J. AusberryLB | 37 | 20 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. SneedLB | 36 | 20 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| B. TraoreDL | 30 | 19 | — | 7.0 | 4.0 | 1 | 2 | — |
| B. YoungDL | 25 | 15 | — | 6.0 | 3.5 | — | 0 | — |
| K. Viliamu-AsaLB | 22 | 12 | — | 3.5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| C. GrayCB | 18 | 11 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 3 | — |
| A. MukamDL | 17 | 13 | — | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | — |
| F. BrewuDL | 16 | 9 | — | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | — |
| L. MooreCB | 16 | 13 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 5 | — |
| T. GrayDL | 16 | 7 | — | 1.5 | 1 | — | 1 | — |
| J. SandersCB | 13 | 7 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8 | — |
| J. O'BrienS | 12 | 4 | — | 1.5 | 0.5 | — | 1 | — |
| L. ThomasDL | 12 | 6 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — |
| R. DunhamDL | 12 | 7 | — | 2.5 | 1 | — | 1 | — |
| D. McKinneyCB | 9 | 6 | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | — |
| K. KeeleyDL | 9 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — |
| E. LongS | 8 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| M. FaraimoLB | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| M. Zackery IVCB | 6 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — |
| E. HughesDL | 5 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. ClapperLB | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| S. Sevillano Jr.DL | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. OnyeDL | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| T. RezacLB | 4 | 2 | — | 0.5 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| B. LoganS | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| M. JefferyWR | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| A. PounceyCB | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| D. GoldenCB | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| E. EwetadeDL | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| K. KiaLB | 2 | 1 | — | 0.5 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| B. JohnsonS | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| C. MullinsDL | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| G. SulfstedDL | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. FlaniganTE | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. WaltonRB | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. VinciLS | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| K. KiaLB | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| S. PorathPK | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| T. Davis Jr.LB | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 496 | 292 | 0 | 41 | 17 | 9 | 33 | 0 |
| PLAYER | FGM | FGA | FG% | XPM | XPA | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S. PorathPK | 11 | 13 | — | 40 | 41 | 73 |
| M. DrescherPK | 0 | 0 | — | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| TEAM TOTALS | 11 | 13 | 84.6 | 43 | 44 | 76 |
Did Notre Dame stay put in ESPN’s FPI after the big win over Miami?. Notre Dame was the top team in ESPN's Football Power Index last week. Did the Irish stay in that position after the upset win over Miami?
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATENotre Dame Legend Joe Montana Makes Personal Confession About His Daughter During College GameDay Appearance. Scouts did not see this coming. At one pre-draft combine, a quarterback out of Notre Dame graded at six and a half overall, with a six in arm strength, while Washington State’s Jack Thompson earned an eight, the highest mark among eligible passers.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATECristobal Apologizes for Blasting Officials After Ruling Erased Lofton's Apparent Tying Touchdown. Miami coach Mario Cristobal said an Elija Lofton catch should have counted as a touchdown after it was ruled incomplete and upheld on replay review in a 31-24 loss at Notre Dame, per CBS Sports. No. 1 Miami fell to No.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEHow far did Miami Hurricanes slide in Coaches Poll after first loss?. After their first loss of the year at Notre Dame, the Miami Hurricanes now await the next CFP rankings to see their playoff chances.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEGeorgia was voted No. 1 in The Associated Press Top 25 for the second time this season Sunday, unbeaten UCLA matched its highest ranking in 25 years, and Ohio State 's free fall continued after a wild weekend that followed the first College Football Playoff rankings of the year. Only one team -- No. 6 Indiana , which was idle -- remained in the same spot it had a week ago in the Top 25. The Bulldogs had been No. 1 for one week before they were upset by Auburn on Oct. 17 but never dropped out of the top five, and they were the voters' choice for No. 1 by a wide margin over Utah and Notre Dame . Utah moved up one spot to No. 2 after its 28-20 win over rival BYU , giving the Utes their highest-ever AP ranking in the regular season. The Fighting Irish's 31-24 win over Miami pushed them up one rung to No. 3, while the Hurricanes fell to No. 5 after their first loss. Georgia earned 53 of the 70 first-place votes from the media voting panel. Utah received 12 first-place votes, and Notre Dame got five. UCLA is 9-0 for the first time since 1998 and moved up to No. 4.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEFormer Florida State quarterback Danny Kanell revealed his updated Top 12 teams in the country following Week 10. With a No. 1 team going down, there were of course some changes once again! Miami fell to Notre Dame but neither dropped out of Kanell’s rankings this week. In fact, they are both in a good position. Key points from the original article: 1. Utah 2. UCLA 3. Georgia 4. Notre Dame 5. Indiana 6. Miami 7. Wake Forest 8. Texas 9. Tennessee 10. Alabama 11. Texas Tech 12. USC
READ UPDATE →STATTAKEThe Irish have not beaten a top-five opponent. They have outscored Wisconsin and Rice 93–13, which is exactly what an elite team should do.
READ UPDATE →FEATURED ANALYSISThe betting market sees a seven-team championship tier. StatTake’s 2025 efficiency data draws a sharper line around Ohio State, Oregon and Indiana—and exposes the different bets being made on Texas, Notre Dame, Georgia and Miami.
READ UPDATE →Track class strength, position balance and roster needs across signing cycles.
See how efficiently signed talent develops into starts, impact and wins.
Separate returning development from incoming and outgoing portal value.
Wins, efficiency and schedule strength in one timeline.
Home, road, favorite and underdog performance.
Recent form versus the long-term series story.
Drafted players by position and development path.