Georgia State
Western Kentucky
UConn
Miami (OH)
Ball State
Wisconsin
Wake Forest
Air Force
Massachusetts
Liberty
Navy
MissouriFour-year talent direction
Track class strength, position balance and roster needs across signing cycles.
STATTAKE DATABASEFIND ANY TEAM OR PLAYER
American • FBS TEAM DATABASE
Army
Complete schedules, team production, player statistics, news, analytics, recruiting and program history in one fan destination.
2021 SEASON DATABASE
Army football
Record: 9–4 (Schedule & Results)
Conference: American
Players: 69
Points For: 427
Points/Game: 32.8
Points Against: 290
Opp. Points/Game: 22.3
2021 SEASON
LIVE SCOREBOARD →Schedule & results
OFFICIAL SCHEDULE FEEDOpponent names and logos open team pages. Dates and results open StatTake box scores.
WEEKOPPONENTLOCATIONGAME
WEEK 6BYE——
WEEK 9BYE——
WEEK 14BYE——
POSTSEASONBOWL & PLAYOFF GAMES
TEAM PRODUCTION
Team stats
Season totals organized for quick comparison. Swipe horizontally for more.
2021 SEASON TOTALS
ALL GAMESOffense at a glance
| PASS CMP | PASS ATT | PASS YDS | PASS % | PASS AVG | PASS TD | PASS INT | PASS RTG | SACK | RUSH ATT | RUSH YDS | RUSH AVG | RUSH TD | REC | REC YDS | REC AVG | REC TD | PTS/G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 60 | 110 | 1,233 | 54.5 | 11.2 | 11 | 3 | 176.2 | 0 | 752 | 3,662 | 4.9 | 46 | 60 | 1,233 | 20.6 | 11 | 32.8 |
TEAM ANALYTICS CENTER
OPEN NATIONAL ANALYTICS →Army analytics
LOADING 2021 EPA METRICS
The verified team snapshot is loading now.
2021 COMPLETE TEAM ROSTER
PLAYER PROFILES →Individual player statistics
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Passing
| PLAYER | CMP | ATT | YDS | CMP% | AVG | TD | INT | RTG | SACK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. AndersonQB | 31 | 63 | 713 | 49.2 | 11.3 | 5 | 0 | 170.5 | — |
| J. LawsQB | 19 | 24 | 306 | 79.2 | 12.8 | 4 | 0 | 241.3 | — |
| J. JonesQB | 7 | 13 | 135 | 53.8 | 10.4 | 1 | 1 | 151.1 | — |
| T. TylerQB | 3 | 7 | 79 | 42.9 | 11.3 | 1 | 1 | 156.2 | — |
| C. BallardQB | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 | -100.0 | — |
| T. RobinsonRB | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 60 | 110 | 1,233 | 54.5 | 11.2 | 11 | 3 | 176.2 | 0 |
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Rushing
| PLAYER | CAR | YDS | AVG | LNG | TD | FUM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. AndersonQB | 108 | 619 | 5.7 | 75 | 8 | — |
| T. RobinsonRB | 72 | 609 | 8.5 | 87 | 3 | — |
| J. BuchananRB | 136 | 504 | 3.7 | 26 | 12 | — |
| T. TylerQB | 125 | 486 | 3.9 | 36 | 7 | — |
| A. AdkinsRB | 76 | 355 | 4.7 | 71 | 5 | — |
| B. WaltersRB | 16 | 198 | 12.4 | 58 | 1 | — |
| T. RileyRB | 44 | 198 | 4.5 | 17 | 2 | — |
| C. BarnardRB | 34 | 129 | 3.8 | 16 | 0 | — |
| J. JonesQB | 30 | 124 | 4.1 | 17 | 1 | — |
| A. HowardRB | 20 | 106 | 5.3 | 16 | 2 | — |
| W. CatoeFB | 20 | 71 | 3.5 | 9 | 2 | — |
| B. MurphyRB | 12 | 51 | 4.3 | 25 | 0 | — |
| J. LawsQB | 23 | 43 | 1.9 | 13 | 0 | — |
| S. WilliamsRB | 13 | 41 | 3.2 | 9 | 1 | — |
| C. BallardQB | 7 | 40 | 5.7 | 9 | 0 | — |
| L. VeneyWR | 3 | 30 | 10.0 | 12 | 0 | — |
| M. PierreRB | 3 | 28 | 9.3 | 19 | 1 | — |
| J. LescouflairRB | 4 | 16 | 4.0 | 10 | 0 | — |
| M. BellanRB | 2 | 16 | 8.0 | 9 | 0 | — |
| A. MarshallWR | 1 | 10 | 10.0 | 10 | 0 | — |
| R. DonaldsonWR | 2 | 1 | 0.5 | 9 | 0 | — |
| J. LawOL | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 1 | — |
| Z. HardingP | 1 | -13 | -13.0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 752 | 3,662 | 4.9 | 87 | 46 | 0 |
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Receiving
| PLAYER | REC | YDS | AVG | LNG | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I. AlstonWR | 22 | 449 | 20.4 | 48 | 3 |
| T. RobinsonRB | 12 | 340 | 28.3 | 79 | 3 |
| B. MurphyRB | 5 | 114 | 22.8 | 40 | 3 |
| B. WaltersRB | 5 | 89 | 17.8 | 39 | 1 |
| C. CaterboneWR | 5 | 45 | 9.0 | 14 | 0 |
| A. HowardRB | 2 | 40 | 20.0 | 36 | 0 |
| R. JackovicWR | 1 | 37 | 37.0 | 37 | 0 |
| J. LingenfelterTE | 1 | 31 | 31.0 | 31 | 0 |
| S. EckertWR | 1 | 26 | 26.0 | 26 | 0 |
| A. MarshallWR | 1 | 22 | 22.0 | 22 | 1 |
| R. DonaldsonWR | 2 | 15 | 7.5 | 10 | 0 |
| M. RobertsWR | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 8 | 0 |
| C. BarnardRB | 1 | 12 | 12.0 | 12 | 0 |
| TEAM TOTALS | 60 | 1,233 | 20.6 | 79 | 11 |
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Defense
| PLAYER | TOT | SOLO | AST | TFL | SACK | INT | PD | FF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. SmithLB | 80 | 46 | — | 9.5 | 4.0 | — | 0 | — |
| M. BroughtonDB | 64 | 36 | — | 3 | 0 | 2 | 5 | — |
| C. CunninghamDB | 56 | 37 | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | — |
| M. MorrisonLB | 48 | 31 | — | 5.0 | 0 | — | 3 | — |
| J. MooreDB | 46 | 33 | — | 0 | 0 | 2 | 7 | — |
| A. Carter IILB | 41 | 31 | — | 17.5 | 14.5 | 1 | 1 | — |
| L. LowinLB | 35 | 21 | — | 3.5 | 1 | — | 1 | — |
| J. McDuffieCB | 32 | 24 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| N. CockrillDL | 32 | 15 | — | 5.5 | 2.0 | — | 1 | — |
| K. BonsuDL | 31 | 14 | — | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | — |
| C. FreyDL | 23 | 4 | — | 1.5 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| K. YowLB | 23 | 8 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| C. JonesDB | 16 | 15 | — | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | — |
| S. JonesLB | 13 | 9 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — |
| J. JacobsLB | 12 | 7 | — | 2.0 | 1.5 | 1 | 0 | — |
| I. MorrisDB | 10 | 10 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 4 | — |
| R. Duran IIIDL | 9 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| N. SmithDL | 8 | 3 | — | 2.5 | 2.0 | — | 2 | — |
| P. HamptonLB | 8 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| F. VoyneLB | 7 | 5 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| Q. HammondsDB | 7 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| B. Nicolas-PaulDB | 6 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — |
| C. BarnardRB | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| D. TobiasDB | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| W. CatoeFB | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| B. BurtonLB | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| C. MabryLB | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | — |
| D. RichardsonDL | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. CiarloLB | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| M. DiDomenicoS | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| A. HillDL | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| A. MarshallWR | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| B. GerenaLB | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| C. CaterboneWR | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| H. BakerDB | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| M. PierreRB | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| A. AdkinsRB | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| B. WaltersRB | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| C. PattonCB | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| D. McDonaldLB | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| D. BernardDB | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| D. MillerDL | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. MoyWR | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| T. KomorowskiDL | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 654 | 389 | 0 | 61 | 28 | 10 | 33 | 0 |
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Kicking & Scoring
| PLAYER | FGM | FGA | FG% | XPM | XPA | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. TalleyPK | 8 | 11 | — | 44 | 45 | 68 |
| Q. MaretzkiPK | 1 | 1 | — | 7 | 7 | 10 |
| T. GronottePK | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| TEAM TOTALS | 9 | 12 | 75.0 | 52 | 53 | 79 |
TEAM NEWS + STATTAKE ARTICLES
ALL CFB NEWS →Latest Army coverage
NATIONAL UPDATE
All 32 remaining College Football Playoff contenders, tiered.
As a result of expansion, Power Four conference championships are going away, and each league announced their respective title games this year would be the last. $39.99 gets you a FULL year of On3 | Rivals national coverage Each of the power conference commissioners shared their reactions to the news Monday, as well. SEC commissioner Greg Sankey said the new-look College Football Playoff will have a broader impact than just putting more teams in the bracket. “Expanding the College Football Playoff is about more than adding teams,” Sankey said in a statement. “It is about creating meaningful opportunities for student-athletes and universities, rewarding competitive excellence and challenging schedules, increasing fan access to championship competition by expanding the number of on-campus playoff games, and strengthening the importance of the entire season from opening weekend through the national championship. “This new format advances those priorities while preserving what makes college football special and supporting the long-term future of our sport.” With expansion, team schedules are also set to change .
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEArmy hammers FAU 56-24 behind 479 rushing yards, 8 TD.
Army hammers FAU 56-24 behind 479 rushing yards, 8 TD. Cale Hellums rushes for 195 yards and a program record 5 TD in the Black Knights’ best win of 2026.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATERecruiting Roundup: Several Husky Commits Kick Off Their 2026 Season.
Recruiting Roundup: Several Husky Commits Kick Off Their 2026 Season. Today is the last Sunday without Husky football football happening for the next few months, which means recruiting is kicking into gear again. High school football is also kicking off and several Husky targets saw their seasons start. Teammates Blake Rospkopf and Zerek Sidney (from Desert Edge) both had solid outings in their first games of their senior seasons against Cactus Shadows. Roskopf had 416 yards through the air with 3 touchdowns and 1 INT. Roskopf, who is set to enroll early and also take part in the Army All American Game, is set to have a big year for Desert Edge this season.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATECollege Football Playoff Rankings: 2026 Preseason Top 25 Predictions.
College Football Playoff Rankings: 2026 Preseason Top 25 Predictions. What will the final College Football Playoff rankings look like? Here’s our preseason prediction for the Top 25 and where all 138 teams stand in the 2026-2027 race. They're the College Football Playoff rankings, and after all the regular season and conference championship fun is over – with the bizarre exception of Army vs Navy, which happens a week after the bowls and CFP are set – did your team finish high enough in the top 25?
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEArmy: 2026 SEC Preseason Power Rankings: Georgia Leads a Loaded Conference.
2026 SEC Preseason Power Rankings: Georgia Leads a Loaded Conference. Another college football season is here, and once again, the SEC looks like one of the deepest conferences in the country. Georgia enters the preseason at the top of our Fan Army CFB SEC Power Rankings, but the gap isn’t huge. Texas, Ole Miss, Texas A&M and Oklahoma all sit inside the top five, while programs like LSU, Alabama and Tennessee have more than enough talent to make a run.
READ UPDATE →ROSTER BUILDING
RECRUITING HUB →Recruiting & development
Recruiting to production
See how efficiently signed talent develops into starts, impact and wins.
What transfers added
Separate returning development from incoming and outgoing portal value.
PROGRAM CONTEXT
TEAM TRENDS →History & trends
Wins, efficiency and schedule strength in one timeline.
Home, road, favorite and underdog performance.
Recent form versus the long-term series story.
Drafted players by position and development path.
Charlotte
East Carolina
Florida Atlantic
Memphis
North Texas