Oklahoma
Michigan
Oregon State
New Mexico
Nevada
San José State
North Dakota State
Hawai'i
Wyoming
Air Force
Northern IllinoisFour-year talent direction
Track class strength, position balance and roster needs across signing cycles.
STATTAKE DATABASEFIND ANY TEAM OR PLAYER
Mountain West • FBS TEAM DATABASE
UTEP
Complete schedules, team production, player statistics, news, analytics, recruiting and program history in one fan destination.
2026 SEASON DATABASE
UTEP football
Record: 1–1 (Schedule & Results)
Conference: Mountain West
Players: 51
Points For: 51
Points/Game: 25.5
Points Against: 61
Opp. Points/Game: 30.5
2026 SEASON
LIVE SCOREBOARD →Schedule & results
OFFICIAL SCHEDULE FEEDOpponent names and logos open team pages. Dates and results open StatTake box scores.
WEEKOPPONENTLOCATIONGAME
WEEK 8BYE——
TEAM PRODUCTION
Team stats
Season totals organized for quick comparison. Swipe horizontally for more.
2026 SEASON TOTALS
ALL GAMESOffense at a glance
| PASS CMP | PASS ATT | PASS YDS | PASS % | PASS AVG | PASS TD | PASS INT | PASS RTG | SACK | RUSH ATT | RUSH YDS | RUSH AVG | RUSH TD | REC | REC YDS | REC AVG | REC TD | PTS/G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24 | 39 | 325 | 61.5 | 8.3 | 4 | 0 | 165.4 | 0 | 71 | 364 | 5.1 | 3 | 24 | 325 | 13.5 | 4 | 25.5 |
TEAM ANALYTICS CENTER
OPEN NATIONAL ANALYTICS →UTEP analytics
LOADING 2026 EPA METRICS
The verified team snapshot is loading now.
2026 COMPLETE TEAM ROSTER
PLAYER PROFILES →Individual player statistics
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Passing
| PLAYER | CMP | ATT | YDS | CMP% | AVG | TD | INT | RTG | SACK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E. Colson Jr.QB | 20 | 33 | 291 | 60.6 | 8.8 | 4 | 0 | 174.7 | — |
| R. Moore IIIQB | 3 | 5 | 26 | 60.0 | 5.2 | 0 | 0 | 103.7 | — |
| J. SmithWR | 1 | 1 | 8 | 100.0 | 8.0 | 0 | 0 | 167.2 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 24 | 39 | 325 | 61.5 | 8.3 | 4 | 0 | 165.4 | 0 |
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Rushing
| PLAYER | CAR | YDS | AVG | LNG | TD | FUM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R. Moore IIIQB | 12 | 142 | 11.8 | 79 | 1 | — |
| T. JonesRB | 21 | 128 | 6.1 | 33 | 1 | — |
| E. Colson Jr.QB | 28 | 74 | 2.6 | 13 | 1 | — |
| L. SperlingRB | 6 | 13 | 2.2 | 6 | 0 | — |
| N. HenryWR | 1 | 10 | 10.0 | 10 | 0 | — |
| E. McCoyRB | 2 | 2 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | — |
| K. ThomasRB | 1 | -5 | -5.0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 71 | 364 | 5.1 | 79 | 3 | 0 |
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Receiving
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Defense
| PLAYER | TOT | SOLO | AST | TFL | SACK | INT | PD | FF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I. BogertyLB | 10 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| X. SmithS | 10 | 5 | — | 0.5 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| D. HowardS | 9 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| G. HawkinsLB | 8 | 2 | — | 0.5 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| J. WilsonLB | 8 | 2 | — | 1.5 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| A. HutchinsonDB | 7 | 3 | — | 1.5 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| S. SmithLB | 7 | 2 | — | 0.5 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| E. GuilloryS | 6 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — |
| G. StewartDB | 6 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| K. MilesCB | 6 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| E. FieldsDL | 5 | 1 | — | 0.5 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| S. BowserDL | 5 | 1 | — | 1.0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| D. WilliamsS | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| D. BurnsDL | 4 | 3 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — |
| J. ContentCB | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| O. FisherDL | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| R. WilsonDE | 4 | 1 | — | 0.5 | 0.5 | — | 0 | — |
| A. CokerDT | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| C. BiddleS | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| D. ThompsonCB | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. GuerreroS | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| C. WindfontLB | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. BrasherDL | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. LeonDL | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. LeeLB | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| L. ThompsonDB | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| L. ParrishDL | 2 | 0 | — | 0.5 | 0.5 | — | 0 | — |
| S. MilesDE | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — |
| T. TillmanCB | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| V. Brunswick IILB | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| D. DavisDE | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. ShawDE | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| K. White-TinsleyS | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| K. Taylor-BarrocksDE | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| P. HickeyDL | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 142 | 56 | 0 | 12 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Kicking & Scoring
| PLAYER | FGM | FGA | FG% | XPM | XPA | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. ArreolaPK | 1 | 4 | — | 6 | 7 | 9 |
| TEAM TOTALS | 1 | 4 | 25.0 | 6 | 7 | 9 |
TEAM NEWS + STATTAKE ARTICLES
ALL CFB NEWS →Latest UTEP coverage
NATIONAL UPDATE
Report: Oklahoma starting OT Michael Fasusi 'faces long odds' to play against Geor…
He’s Oklahoma’s top offensive linemen, and he’s only played limited snaps in the first half of the opener against UTEP. He’s dealing with a shoulder injury that cost him the… pic.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEAfter injuries reshuffled the offensive line on Saturday against UTEP, head coach…
After injuries reshuffled the offensive line on Saturday against UTEP, head coach Kyle Whittingham provided a pair of crucial updates on the Inside Michigan Football Radio Show : "Jordan [Marshall] will be available unless there's a setback," Whittingham told host Jon Jansen. "Andrew Sprague, gosh, that's a tough question," Whittingham continued. "I think, you know, it could be anywhere from this week to several weeks, and so we just don't know." With backup tackle Andrew Babalola already out indefinitely, Sprague's status puts an uneasy strain on the unit. However, Whittingham was particularly pleased with their play, and 185 rushing yards and three touchdowns on 42 carries bodes well for future matchups: "Those are the two areas that have really started to get some traction," Whittingham said. "Offensive line played their best game of the season on Saturday, and obviously Bryce played his best game."
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEMichigan: Meanwhile, the Wolverines have a projected win-loss record of 8.1-4.0, a…
Meanwhile, the Wolverines have a projected win-loss record of 8.1-4.0, a 2.8 percent chance of winning the conference, and an encouraging 23.6 percent likelihood of reaching the College Football Playoff. However, their odds of making the National Championship (2.1 percent) and being crowned national champions (0.7 percent) remain unsurprisingly low. Do you think the FPI rated Michigan accurately?
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEMichigan: Game Thread: No.
Game Thread: No. 19 Michigan Football vs UTEP. Michigan Football looks to build on last week’s upset over Oklahoma, as the Wolverines welcome UTEP to The Big House. Join us for today’s Game Thread!
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEMichigan vs.
Michigan vs. UTEP Prediction, Odds, Picks for College Football Week 3. Get the latest Michigan vs. UTEP odds, prediction and pick for College Football Week 3, plus kickoff time, TV channel and streaming information.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEThe Michigan Wolverines return to The Big House this Saturday to take on UTEP, but…
The Michigan Wolverines return to The Big House this Saturday to take on UTEP, but they will begin their Big Ten campaign the following week when they host the Iowa Hawkeyes . Before now, we didn't have any information as far as when that game would start or what TV network it would be aired on. Well, now we have all those details, as the Big Ten released start times and TV designations for Week 4 on Monday afternoon. The Hawkeyes are off to a 2-0 start as well, with wins over Northern Illinois (40-0) and Iowa State (16-13). They needed two fourth-quarter field goals to take down their in-state rivals this past weekend, but they did what they needed to do to get the job done and remain unbeaten. The Wolverines also won at Kinnick Stadium in 2022 by a final score of 27-14. The last time Iowa beat Michigan was back in 2016 on a walk-off field goal, 14-13. The last time Iowa won at The Big House was all the way back in 2010.
READ UPDATE →ROSTER BUILDING
RECRUITING HUB →Recruiting & development
Recruiting to production
See how efficiently signed talent develops into starts, impact and wins.
What transfers added
Separate returning development from incoming and outgoing portal value.
PROGRAM CONTEXT
TEAM TRENDS →History & trends
Wins, efficiency and schedule strength in one timeline.
Home, road, favorite and underdog performance.
Recent form versus the long-term series story.
Drafted players by position and development path.