Utah State
Texas
UL Monroe
Louisiana Tech
Liberty
Sam Houston
Kennesaw State
Jacksonville State
Missouri State
New Mexico State
DelawareFour-year talent direction
Track class strength, position balance and roster needs across signing cycles.
STATTAKE DATABASEFIND ANY TEAM OR PLAYER
Mountain West • FBS TEAM DATABASE
UTEP
Complete schedules, team production, player statistics, news, analytics, recruiting and program history in one fan destination.
2025 SEASON DATABASE
UTEP football
Record: 2–10 (Schedule & Results)
Conference: Mountain West
Players: 65
Points For: 280
Points/Game: 23.3
Points Against: 365
Opp. Points/Game: 30.4
2025 SEASON
LIVE SCOREBOARD →Schedule & results
OFFICIAL SCHEDULE FEEDOpponent names and logos open team pages. Dates and results open StatTake box scores.
WEEKOPPONENTLOCATIONGAME
WEEK 5BYE——
WEEK 8BYE——
TEAM PRODUCTION
Team stats
Season totals organized for quick comparison. Swipe horizontally for more.
2025 SEASON TOTALS
ALL GAMESOffense at a glance
| PASS CMP | PASS ATT | PASS YDS | PASS % | PASS AVG | PASS TD | PASS INT | PASS RTG | SACK | RUSH ATT | RUSH YDS | RUSH AVG | RUSH TD | REC | REC YDS | REC AVG | REC TD | PTS/G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 224 | 410 | 2,595 | 54.6 | 6.3 | 21 | 20 | 114.9 | 0 | 372 | 1,397 | 3.8 | 14 | 224 | 2,595 | 11.6 | 21 | 23.3 |
TEAM ANALYTICS CENTER
OPEN NATIONAL ANALYTICS →UTEP analytics
LOADING 2025 EPA METRICS
The verified team snapshot is loading now.
2025 COMPLETE TEAM ROSTER
PLAYER PROFILES →Individual player statistics
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Passing
| PLAYER | CMP | ATT | YDS | CMP% | AVG | TD | INT | RTG | SACK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S. LocklearQB | 117 | 211 | 1418 | 55.5 | 6.7 | 13 | 11 | 121.8 | — |
| M. NelsonQB | 104 | 190 | 1163 | 54.7 | 6.1 | 8 | 9 | 110.6 | — |
| S. SmithLB | 3 | 8 | 14 | 37.5 | 1.8 | 0 | 0 | 52.2 | — |
| W. Davis Jr.WR | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 224 | 410 | 2,595 | 54.6 | 6.3 | 21 | 20 | 114.9 | 0 |
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Rushing
| PLAYER | CAR | YDS | AVG | LNG | TD | FUM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. EmoryRB | 119 | 569 | 4.8 | 56 | 4 | — |
| S. LocklearQB | 103 | 396 | 3.8 | 63 | 8 | — |
| H. WilsonRB | 46 | 225 | 4.9 | 94 | 1 | — |
| K. OdomWR | 13 | 57 | 4.4 | 13 | 0 | — |
| E. McCoyRB | 15 | 47 | 3.1 | 12 | 0 | — |
| M. TaylorRB | 17 | 43 | 2.5 | 10 | 0 | — |
| K. ThomasRB | 16 | 36 | 2.3 | 17 | 0 | — |
| S. SmithLB | 13 | 30 | 2.3 | 8 | 1 | — |
| E. Willis IIIWR | 3 | 5 | 1.7 | 6 | 0 | — |
| J. BellRB | 1 | 4 | 4.0 | 4 | 0 | — |
| G. HawkinsLB | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 2 | 0 | — |
| T. TateWR | 2 | -4 | -2.0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| M. NelsonQB | 23 | -13 | -0.6 | 10 | 0 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 372 | 1,397 | 3.8 | 94 | 14 | 0 |
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Receiving
| PLAYER | REC | YDS | AVG | LNG | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W. Davis Jr.WR | 25 | 604 | 24.2 | 75 | 6 |
| K. OdomWR | 62 | 582 | 9.4 | 74 | 6 |
| E. Willis IIIWR | 27 | 290 | 10.7 | 43 | 2 |
| J. SchuchtsTE | 21 | 232 | 11.0 | 64 | 3 |
| T. TateWR | 20 | 227 | 11.3 | 73 | 1 |
| T. Goins Jr.WR | 13 | 206 | 15.8 | 49 | 1 |
| A. EmoryRB | 16 | 103 | 6.4 | 21 | 2 |
| J. BrownWR | 10 | 103 | 10.3 | 34 | 0 |
| J. EzinwaTE | 4 | 76 | 19.0 | 33 | 0 |
| H. WilsonRB | 7 | 41 | 5.9 | 24 | 0 |
| R. CampbellWR | 2 | 27 | 13.5 | 21 | 0 |
| K. ThomasRB | 4 | 26 | 6.5 | 13 | 0 |
| M. TorresWR | 4 | 22 | 5.5 | 8 | 0 |
| A. NickelberryWR | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 11 | 0 |
| M. TaylorRB | 3 | 13 | 4.3 | 7 | 0 |
| S. LocklearQB | 0 | 12 | — | 12 | 0 |
| J. AndrusTE | 1 | 9 | 9.0 | 9 | 0 |
| M. FergusonWR | 2 | 8 | 4.0 | 7 | 0 |
| E. McCoyRB | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 3 | 0 |
| J. ImmediatoOL | 0 | -2 | — | -2 | 0 |
| TEAM TOTALS | 224 | 2,595 | 11.6 | 75 | 21 |
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Defense
| PLAYER | TOT | SOLO | AST | TFL | SACK | INT | PD | FF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M. DaveyLB | 114 | 56 | — | 7.5 | 1 | — | 0 | — |
| J. WilsonLB | 92 | 35 | — | 8.0 | 0.5 | 1 | 0 | — |
| X. SmithS | 60 | 20 | — | 1.5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | — |
| S. BarnesS | 59 | 36 | — | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4 | — |
| J. ContentCB | 58 | 32 | — | 5.5 | 0 | 1 | 6 | — |
| N. CampbellCB | 56 | 26 | — | 6.0 | 2 | — | 3 | — |
| K. JohnsonDT | 55 | 19 | — | 10.0 | 3.5 | — | 1 | — |
| U. EzeaniDL | 41 | 20 | — | 9.5 | 5 | — | 1 | — |
| K. LoweS | 34 | 15 | — | 4 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| D. ThompsonLB | 31 | 16 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 3 | — |
| L. RussellS | 27 | 12 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 3 | — |
| A. HallDL | 24 | 8 | — | 4.0 | 3 | — | 1 | — |
| A. CokerDT | 23 | 8 | — | 4.0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| E. BaldwinLB | 23 | 12 | — | 5.5 | 3.5 | — | 4 | — |
| S. BowserDL | 23 | 9 | — | 3.0 | 2 | — | 0 | — |
| Y. GreenCB | 20 | 14 | — | 0.5 | 0.5 | — | 0 | — |
| C. GustafsonDL | 19 | 4 | — | 3.0 | 1.5 | — | 2 | — |
| J. RudolphLB | 18 | 5 | — | 1 | 0.5 | — | 0 | — |
| M. BlockerCB | 18 | 14 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 3 | — |
| S. ShufeltLB | 18 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — |
| E. TaylorDE | 12 | 9 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — |
| T. TillmanCB | 12 | 7 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| T. ScottDL | 11 | 5 | — | 1.5 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| G. HawkinsLB | 10 | 4 | — | 0.5 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| V. Brunswick IILB | 8 | 7 | — | 1.5 | 1 | — | 0 | — |
| A. SzczesniakLB | 7 | 7 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| D. WilliamsS | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. HancockLS | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| W. Davis Jr.WR | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| A. GantS | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| D. Brown-TurnerDB | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. UtleyOL | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. EzinwaTE | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| K. OdomWR | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| A. EmoryRB | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| A. NickelberryWR | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| C. WalkerS | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| D. WilsonDB | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| H. WilsonRB | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| I. EscobarOL | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. GuerreroS | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. SchuchtsTE | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| M. FergusonWR | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| N. HenryWR | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| T. Goins Jr.WR | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| T. JonesS | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 906 | 425 | 0 | 82.5 | 28 | 5 | 37 | 0 |
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Kicking & Scoring
| PLAYER | FGM | FGA | FG% | XPM | XPA | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T. CragunPK | 6 | 8 | — | 0 | 0 | 18 |
| C. ArreolaPK | 3 | 6 | — | 27 | 28 | 36 |
| TEAM TOTALS | 9 | 14 | 64.3 | 27 | 28 | 54 |
TEAM NEWS + STATTAKE ARTICLES
ALL CFB NEWS →Latest UTEP coverage
NATIONAL UPDATE
North Dakota State: Mountaintop View 10-29-26.
Mountaintop View 10-29-26. Conference Realignment, Top MBB Players, Bowl Projections, Maxwell Award, Kellen Moore.. Catch the latest news and links for the day as we get closer to football games. Mountain West additions have been mixed.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATENorth Dakota State: NDSU Receives QB Injury Update Ahead Of UTEP Game.
NDSU Receives QB Injury Update Ahead Of UTEP Game. North Dakota State Bison senior quarterback Nathan Hayes injured his ankle against New Mexico, and head coach Tim Polasek had an update on Tuesday. The post NDSU Receives QB Injury Update Ahead Of UTEP Game appeared first on HEAVY.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEOklahoma OL Michael Fasusi doubtful for Red River Rivalry, latest on return.
He’s currently listed as doubtful for this weekend’s Red River Rivalry game against Texas and is not expected to play, sources said. Fasusi’s absence through the first half of the season has produced questions about his availability moving forward. No timetable is clear, but the star offensive tackle and Oklahoma’s best offensive lineman is working to return. Fasusi also wants to play again this season. Sources have said he’s been patient to avoid rushing back, so he can fully recover and avoid reinjuring his shoulder. “And we thought it best to give him, just looking at the long term, both this season and just overall, and it giving the best chance to get healthy for the near future.” A former Five-Star Plus+ recruit, Fasusi reinjured his shoulder in the Sooners’ season-opening win over UTEP after an injury during training camp. He was the prized recruit of Oklahoma’s 2025 recruiting class and played in 11 games as a true freshman, starting 10 at left tackle.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEOklahoma OT Michael Fasusi listed as doubtful on SEC injury report ahead of Texas.
And on Wednesday, news broke about his status for the rivalry game in Dallas. This injury dates back a while now for Fasusi. He played in Oklahoma’s opener against UTEP but has not taken the field since. As a result, head coach Brent Venables and OL coach Bill Bedenbaugh have had to completely reshuffle the group up front on the fly. Multiple factors go into the unit struggling, but Venables mainly took aim at the Sooners’ NCAA transfer portal usage. “It’s been incredibly inconsistent and very disappointing,” Venables said of the offensive line. “As you build your football team, that’s a critical place. That’s a place that probably requires the most development of any position that you have on your roster… Very uneven job when it comes to choosing the guys that we’ve brought in here.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATECollege Football Picks, Havoc Rankings: Our Week 5 Prediction for UTEP vs.
College Football Picks, Havoc Rankings: Our Week 5 Prediction for UTEP vs. New Mexico. Read college football picks and Havoc rankings, including Collin Wilson's Week 5 prediction for UTEP vs. New Mexico.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEWyoming: Mountain West Football Rankings: Week 4.
Mountain West Football Rankings: Week 4. Wyoming & Nevada rise, while Hawaii and UTEP fall.. The college football season is firing on all cylinders, and games are happening every weekend. The rankings are back for another week. Key points from the original article: 1. North Dakota State (0) 2. New Mexico (0) 3. Air Force (0) 4. San Jose State (0) 5. UNLV (0) 6. Wyoming (+1) 7. Hawaii (-1) 8. Nevada (+1) 9. UTEP (-1) 10. NIU (0)
READ UPDATE →ROSTER BUILDING
RECRUITING HUB →Recruiting & development
Recruiting to production
See how efficiently signed talent develops into starts, impact and wins.
What transfers added
Separate returning development from incoming and outgoing portal value.
PROGRAM CONTEXT
TEAM TRENDS →History & trends
Wins, efficiency and schedule strength in one timeline.
Home, road, favorite and underdog performance.
Recent form versus the long-term series story.
Drafted players by position and development path.
Air Force
Hawai'i
Nevada
New Mexico
North Dakota State
Northern Illinois