Four-year talent direction
Track class strength, position balance and roster needs across signing cycles.

Complete schedules, team production, player statistics, news, analytics, recruiting and program history in one fan destination.
Record: 2–0 (Schedule & Results)
Conference: SEC
Players: 54
Points For: 101
Points/Game: 50.5
Points Against: 33
Opp. Points/Game: 16.5
Season totals organized for quick comparison. Swipe horizontally for more.
| PASS CMP | PASS ATT | PASS YDS | PASS % | PASS AVG | PASS TD | PASS INT | PASS RTG | SACK | RUSH ATT | RUSH YDS | RUSH AVG | RUSH TD | REC | REC YDS | REC AVG | REC TD | PTS/G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 31 | 48 | 457 | 64.6 | 9.5 | 6 | 0 | 185.8 | 0 | 91 | 632 | 6.9 | 7 | 31 | 457 | 14.7 | 6 | 50.5 |
The verified team snapshot is loading now.
| PLAYER | CMP | ATT | YDS | CMP% | AVG | TD | INT | RTG | SACK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F. BrandonQB | 23 | 38 | 374 | 60.5 | 9.8 | 5 | 0 | 186.6 | — |
| G. MacIntyreQB | 5 | 7 | 56 | 71.4 | 8.0 | 1 | 0 | 185.8 | — |
| R. StaubQB | 3 | 3 | 27 | 100.0 | 9.0 | 0 | 0 | 175.6 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 31 | 48 | 457 | 64.6 | 9.5 | 6 | 0 | 185.8 | 0 |
| PLAYER | REC | YDS | AVG | LNG | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M. MatthewsWR | 6 | 148 | 24.7 | 57 | 2 |
| R. JacksonWR | 6 | 102 | 17.0 | 45 | 0 |
| E. DavisTE | 3 | 43 | 14.3 | 25 | 2 |
| T. KeysWR | 2 | 29 | 14.5 | 22 | 1 |
| B. StaleyWR | 3 | 28 | 9.3 | 20 | 1 |
| T. Smith Jr.WR | 2 | 22 | 11.0 | 15 | 0 |
| J. GordonRB | 1 | 18 | 18.0 | 18 | 0 |
| N. RobertsWR | 2 | 16 | 8.0 | 11 | 0 |
| D. BishopRB | 1 | 15 | 15.0 | 15 | 0 |
| T. ThomasTE | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 7 | 0 |
| D. HardinWR | 1 | 11 | 11.0 | 11 | 0 |
| D. BrameTE | 1 | 7 | 7.0 | 7 | 0 |
| T. KingWR | 1 | 5 | 5.0 | 5 | 0 |
| TEAM TOTALS | 31 | 457 | 14.7 | 57 | 6 |
| PLAYER | TOT | SOLO | AST | TFL | SACK | INT | PD | FF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. CampbellLB | 14 | 8 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 2 | — |
| A. CarterLB | 8 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| J. TelanderLB | 8 | 3 | — | 1.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | — |
| Q. MossDB | 8 | 7 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| T. MetcalfDB | 8 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| T. RedmondDB | 8 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| X. GilliamDL | 8 | 6 | — | 5.5 | 3 | — | 0 | — |
| E. SpillmanLB | 7 | 4 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | — |
| J. NormanDL | 5 | 3 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — |
| D. LaneDB | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | — |
| D. LewisDB | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| M. DyeDL | 4 | 3 | — | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | — |
| N. RobinsonDL | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. PerlotteLB | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| R. ScottLB | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| T. WhiteLB | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| T. Poteat IIIDB | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| T. WeathersbyDL | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | — |
| D. AlbertDL | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| I. HardgeDB | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| K. LeeDB | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| T. MetcalfDB | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| T. MerrittDB | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| D. RiversDL | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| D. BurksDB | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| E. UtleyDL | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| H. HarrisDL | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. TheodoreDB | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. BurnsLB | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. TurbyvillePK | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| K. Golston IIDL | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| D. HobbsDL | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 123 | 75 | 0 | 19 | 10 | 2 | 10 | 0 |
| PLAYER | FGM | FGA | FG% | XPM | XPA | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. RanvierPK | 1 | 1 | — | 13 | 13 | 16 |
| J. TurbyvillePK | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| TEAM TOTALS | 1 | 1 | 100.0 | 14 | 14 | 17 |
On the opposite sideline, Arch Manning has been there, done that. So, can Brandon rise to the occasion against the top team in the country? “I’ll preface it by saying that I recruited him. I thought he was the best high school quarterback in the country. It is really big,” Kelly said on College Sports Radio on Sirius XM . “And I just feel like the guy that in this game a year ago we were talking about and whether he could handle the big moment was Arch Manning. I think Arch is seasoned enough now to go into this game and be the one that actually closes the deal for Texas. I think it’s gonna be a great football game.”
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEFaizon Brandon’s dad reveals recruiting trick that Arch Manning didn’t use | Exclusive. After freshman Faizon Brandon won Tennessee’s starting quarterback job, his father finally revealed a strategy in his college recruitment.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATENeyland Stadium and the Tennessee Volunteers are waiting for the Longhorns on the other side. Unfortunately, there is an injury situation to monitor before then. Smothers joined the program this offseason and looks to be a fantastic addition.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATE2028 Tennessee quarterback commit receives recruiting-ranking boost. 2028 Tennessee quarterback commit receives a ranking boost.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEAfter Week 3 of the college football season, ESPN has updated its FPI rankings for every team in the Big 12. Three weeks into the 2026 season, three Big 12 games have been played. A lot more will take place on Saturday, as schedules mainly shift to conference Opportunities are going to be out there. Key points from the original article: 1. Utah Utes FPI: 16.5 | National rank: No. 15 2. Texas Tech Red Raiders FPI: 15.8 | National rank: No. 17 3. BYU Cougars FPI: 15.2 | National rank: No. 19 4. Kansas State Wildcats FPI: 11.2 | National rank: No. 30 5. Houston Cougars FPI: 10.8 | National rank: No. 31 6. Baylor Bears FPI: 8.1 | National rank: No. 38 7. TCU Horned Frogs FPI: 7.2 | National rank: No. 41 8. Arizona Wildcats FPI: 5.9 | National rank: No. 45 9. Cincinnati Bearcats FPI: 5.8 | National rank: No. 46 10. West Virginia Mountaineers FPI: 5.3 | National rank: No. 49 11. Oklahoma State Cowboys FPI: 5.0 | National rank: No. 50 12. UCF Knights FPI: 4.9 | National rank: No. 52 13. Iowa State Cyclones FPI: 4.4 | National rank: No. 55 14. Arizona State Sun Devils FPI: 3.8 | National rank: No. 58 15. Kansas Jayhawks FPI: -0.1 | National rank: No. 67 16. Colorado Buffaloes FPI: -0.7 |
READ UPDATE →FEATURED STATTAKEThe Manning connection will own the television graphics. The more revealing question is whether Texas can force Tennessee’s freshman quarterback to play outside the clean, low-risk structure that has protected him.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATETennessee will host Ohio State five-star commit for Texas game. Defensive line prospects in the class of 2027 and 2028 will visit Tennessee for its football game against Texas.
READ UPDATE →HOT TAKEGeorgia Tech's 14–13 loss looked close. Fifty-one rushing yards made it much worse—and Tennessee brings the exact offense built to punish that problem.
READ UPDATE →Track class strength, position balance and roster needs across signing cycles.
See how efficiently signed talent develops into starts, impact and wins.
Separate returning development from incoming and outgoing portal value.
Wins, efficiency and schedule strength in one timeline.
Home, road, favorite and underdog performance.
Recent form versus the long-term series story.
Drafted players by position and development path.