Four-year talent direction
Track class strength, position balance and roster needs across signing cycles.

Complete schedules, team production, player statistics, news, analytics, recruiting and program history in one fan destination.
Record: 1–10 (Schedule & Results)
Conference: ACC
Players: 57
Points For: 196
Points/Game: 17.8
Points Against: 360
Opp. Points/Game: 32.7
Season totals organized for quick comparison. Swipe horizontally for more.
| PASS CMP | PASS ATT | PASS YDS | PASS % | PASS AVG | PASS TD | PASS INT | PASS RTG | SACK | RUSH ATT | RUSH YDS | RUSH AVG | RUSH TD | REC | REC YDS | REC AVG | REC TD | PTS/G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 173 | 336 | 1,906 | 51.5 | 5.7 | 15 | 12 | 106.7 | 0 | 318 | 1,007 | 3.2 | 5 | 173 | 1,906 | 11.0 | 15 | 17.8 |
The verified team snapshot is loading now.
| PLAYER | CMP | ATT | YDS | CMP% | AVG | TD | INT | RTG | SACK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R. CulpepperQB | 94 | 190 | 1028 | 49.5 | 5.4 | 9 | 8 | 102.1 | — |
| T. DeVitoQB | 48 | 96 | 593 | 50.0 | 6.2 | 4 | 2 | 111.5 | — |
| J. MorganQB | 31 | 49 | 285 | 63.3 | 5.8 | 2 | 2 | 117.4 | — |
| D. MarkiewiczQB | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 173 | 336 | 1,906 | 51.5 | 5.7 | 15 | 12 | 106.7 | 0 |
| PLAYER | CAR | YDS | AVG | LNG | TD | FUM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S. TuckerRB | 138 | 638 | 4.6 | 40 | 4 | — |
| C. LutzRB | 41 | 229 | 5.6 | 80 | 1 | — |
| N. JohnsonWR | 8 | 82 | 10.3 | 61 | 0 | — |
| J. JordanRB | 29 | 72 | 2.5 | 10 | 0 | — |
| M. PierreRB | 20 | 48 | 2.4 | 7 | 0 | — |
| T. DeVitoQB | 43 | 23 | 0.5 | 19 | 0 | — |
| T. HarrisWR | 1 | 4 | 4.0 | 4 | 0 | — |
| S. LintonEDGE | 1 | -7 | -7.0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| J. MorganQB | 12 | -25 | -2.1 | 14 | 0 | — |
| R. CulpepperQB | 25 | -57 | -2.3 | 7 | 0 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 318 | 1,007 | 3.2 | 80 | 5 | 0 |
| PLAYER | REC | YDS | AVG | LNG | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T. HarrisWR | 58 | 733 | 12.6 | 79 | 5 |
| A. QueeleyWR | 37 | 378 | 10.2 | 32 | 2 |
| N. JohnsonWR | 20 | 323 | 16.1 | 83 | 4 |
| S. TuckerRB | 7 | 103 | 14.7 | 37 | 0 |
| C. JacksonWR | 10 | 69 | 6.9 | 15 | 0 |
| A. HackettTE | 10 | 63 | 6.3 | 13 | 2 |
| L. BensonTE | 6 | 63 | 10.5 | 53 | 2 |
| C. LutzRB | 8 | 56 | 7.0 | 18 | 0 |
| E. HendrixWR | 4 | 55 | 13.8 | 31 | 0 |
| J. JordanRB | 5 | 34 | 6.8 | 18 | 0 |
| S. JohnsonWR | 3 | 10 | 3.3 | 10 | 0 |
| T. DeVitoQB | 1 | 10 | 10.0 | 10 | 0 |
| C. ElmoreFB | 1 | 5 | 5.0 | 5 | 0 |
| D. AlfordWR | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 3 | 0 |
| M. PierreRB | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 2 | 0 |
| T. PenaWR | 1 | -1 | -1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| TEAM TOTALS | 173 | 1,906 | 11.0 | 83 | 15 |
| PLAYER | TOT | SOLO | AST | TFL | SACK | INT | PD | FF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M. JonesLB | 68 | 48 | — | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | — |
| J. CarterS | 65 | 53 | — | 3 | 0 | 2 | 3 | — |
| G. WilliamsDB | 64 | 54 | — | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10 | — |
| G. Cantin-ArkuLB | 61 | 52 | — | 6 | 4 | — | 1 | — |
| I. MelifonwuDB | 54 | 43 | — | 3 | 1 | 1 | 8 | — |
| R. HannaDB | 51 | 43 | — | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — |
| L. KpogbaLB | 43 | 34 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — |
| J. BlackDL | 38 | 22 | — | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | — |
| S. ThompsonLB | 36 | 24 | — | 7.5 | 2 | — | 0 | — |
| M. WilliamsDL | 34 | 25 | — | 8 | 1 | — | 0 | — |
| K. JonathanDL | 31 | 25 | — | 5.5 | 3 | — | 3 | — |
| M. WaxLB | 31 | 25 | — | 5.5 | 3 | — | 0 | — |
| T. RichardsLB | 26 | 16 | — | 3.5 | 2 | — | 1 | — |
| T. WilliamsDB | 23 | 14 | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | — |
| A. GreenwoodDB | 17 | 16 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 4 | — |
| C. RoscoeDL | 17 | 13 | — | 6 | 2 | — | 0 | — |
| C. HarperDL | 16 | 11 | — | 1.5 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| C. OkechukwuDL | 14 | 10 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — |
| S. LintonEDGE | 14 | 11 | — | 0.5 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| A. ColeCB | 11 | 8 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| A. CiscoDB | 11 | 7 | — | 0.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — |
| B. LabrosseDB | 11 | 9 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| D. TuazamaDL | 6 | 4 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| C. JonasDB | 5 | 4 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — |
| K. DartonDL | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| K. StricklandDB | 5 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| L. Lowery Jr.LB | 5 | 4 | — | 0.5 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| E. ColeyDB | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. BarronDB | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| C. LutzRB | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| N. NunnDB | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| T. HarrisWR | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| A. HackettTE | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| E. HendrixWR | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| L. BensonTE | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| M. PierreRB | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| S. Mahar Jr.TE | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| A. QueeleyWR | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| C. AtkinsonCB | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| D. DavisOL | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| I. JonesWR | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| K. NusdeoDB | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| N. CooneyP | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| N. JohnsonWR | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| S. JohnsonWR | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| T. PenaWR | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| Z. MortonDL | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 797 | 611 | 0 | 69 | 24 | 13 | 36 | 0 |
| PLAYER | FGM | FGA | FG% | XPM | XPA | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. SzmytPK | 9 | 11 | — | 23 | 24 | 50 |
| TEAM TOTALS | 9 | 11 | 81.8 | 23 | 24 | 50 |
Syracuse Football Makes Unique History in Difficult Loss to Clemson. The Orange dropped to 4-5 on Saturday with a five-point defeat against the Tigers.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATESyracuse Football: predictions and poll vs Clemson. The Syracuse Orange (4-4, 2-4) are looking to earn a third-straight ACC win on Saturday in the JMA Dome. Here's what we're predicting in this battle of orange: It's not just positive manifestation that leads me to pick the Orange in this one, it's Clemson missing two starters on the offensive line, including their center. A new center and a freshman quarterback on the road against a defensive line that just got after Kevin Jennings seems like a great opportunity for this Syracuse defense to take charge of the afternoon, I think Vince Kehres brings pressure up the middle and off the edge in this one. If the Orange can avoid costly turnovers on offense, I think they have a good chance of winning a 3rd straight ACC game. It all comes down to Clemson's offense versus Syracuse's defense. If Clemson can get to mid-20s in scoring, I think it wins, with its defense doing enough to cool down what's been good offensive production for the Orange.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATESyracuse Football: Where Do Orange Stand in Latest ACC Power Rankings?. Syracuse has won two consecutive games, defeating North Carolina and SMU inside ACC play.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATESyracuse Football: Orange Learn Game Time For Matchup with NC State. The Orange will travel to take on the Wolf Pack later this month as they work to get bowl-eligible.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEDuke, Syracuse rising in ACC power rankings after college football's Week 9. There's a significant move at the top of the ACC college football power rankings and the rise of another from the bottom to the mid-tier after Week 9.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATESyracuse Football: How Does ACC Bowl Picture Look Now?. With two more wins, the Orange would be bowl eligible.
READ UPDATE →STATTAKEMason Heintschel’s seven-touchdown opener was louder. Pitt’s rain-soaked win over UCF revealed the version of the Panthers that can actually survive a season.
READ UPDATE →Track class strength, position balance and roster needs across signing cycles.
See how efficiently signed talent develops into starts, impact and wins.
Separate returning development from incoming and outgoing portal value.
Wins, efficiency and schedule strength in one timeline.
Home, road, favorite and underdog performance.
Recent form versus the long-term series story.
Drafted players by position and development path.