App State
Notre Dame
Mississippi State
Tennessee
Vanderbilt
Missouri
Florida
South Carolina
Auburn
Kentucky
Georgia Tech
Oklahoma
AlabamaFour-year talent direction
Track class strength, position balance and roster needs across signing cycles.
STATTAKE DATABASEFIND ANY TEAM OR PLAYER
SEC • FBS TEAM DATABASE
Georgia
Complete schedules, team production, player statistics, news, analytics, recruiting and program history in one fan destination.
2017 SEASON DATABASE
Georgia football
Record: 13–2 (Schedule & Results)
Conference: SEC
Players: 63
Points For: 531
Points/Game: 35.4
Points Against: 246
Opp. Points/Game: 16.4
2017 SEASON
LIVE SCOREBOARD →Schedule & results
OFFICIAL SCHEDULE FEEDOpponent names and logos open team pages. Dates and results open StatTake box scores.
WEEKOPPONENTLOCATIONGAME
WEEK 8BYE——
POSTSEASONBOWL & PLAYOFF GAMES
TEAM PRODUCTION
Team stats
Season totals organized for quick comparison. Swipe horizontally for more.
2017 SEASON TOTALS
ALL GAMESOffense at a glance
| PASS CMP | PASS ATT | PASS YDS | PASS % | PASS AVG | PASS TD | PASS INT | PASS RTG | SACK | RUSH ATT | RUSH YDS | RUSH AVG | RUSH TD | REC | REC YDS | REC AVG | REC TD | PTS/G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 186 | 303 | 2,653 | 61.4 | 8.8 | 24 | 9 | 155.1 | 0 | 650 | 3,914 | 6.0 | 42 | 186 | 2,653 | 14.3 | 24 | 35.4 |
TEAM ANALYTICS CENTER
OPEN NATIONAL ANALYTICS →Georgia analytics
LOADING 2017 EPA METRICS
The verified team snapshot is loading now.
2017 COMPLETE TEAM ROSTER
PLAYER PROFILES →Individual player statistics
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Passing
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Rushing
| PLAYER | CAR | YDS | AVG | LNG | TD | FUM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N. Chubb? | 223 | 1345 | 6.0 | 55 | 15 | — |
| S. Michel? | 156 | 1227 | 7.9 | 75 | 16 | — |
| D. SwiftRB | 81 | 618 | 7.6 | 71 | 3 | — |
| E. Holyfield? | 50 | 293 | 5.9 | 39 | 2 | — |
| B. HerrienRB | 61 | 265 | 4.3 | 30 | 1 | — |
| J. FrommQB | 55 | 79 | 1.4 | 21 | 3 | — |
| M. HardmanWR | 8 | 61 | 7.6 | 35 | 2 | — |
| C. PayneFB | 5 | 18 | 3.6 | 7 | 0 | — |
| P. HudsonDB | 6 | 15 | 2.5 | 7 | 0 | — |
| R. RidleyWR | 1 | 5 | 5.0 | 5 | 0 | — |
| B. RamseyQB | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| J. EasonQB | 3 | -12 | -4.0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 650 | 3,914 | 6.0 | 75 | 42 | 0 |
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Receiving
| PLAYER | REC | YDS | AVG | LNG | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J. WimsWR | 46 | 724 | 15.7 | 38 | 7 |
| T. GodwinWR | 38 | 639 | 16.8 | 59 | 6 |
| M. HardmanWR | 25 | 418 | 16.7 | 80 | 4 |
| R. RidleyWR | 14 | 218 | 15.6 | 47 | 2 |
| D. SwiftRB | 17 | 153 | 9.0 | 39 | 1 |
| I. NautaTE | 9 | 114 | 12.7 | 41 | 2 |
| C. WoernerTE | 9 | 100 | 11.1 | 50 | 0 |
| A. CrumptonWR | 5 | 96 | 19.2 | 78 | 1 |
| S. Michel? | 9 | 96 | 10.7 | 32 | 1 |
| N. Chubb? | 4 | 30 | 7.5 | 11 | 0 |
| T. SimmonsWR | 3 | 26 | 8.7 | 10 | 0 |
| J. BlazevichTE | 2 | 19 | 9.5 | 12 | 0 |
| J. HarrisTE | 2 | 12 | 6.0 | 8 | 0 |
| J. HollomanWR | 1 | 7 | 7.0 | 7 | 0 |
| B. HerrienRB | 2 | 1 | 0.5 | 1 | 0 |
| TEAM TOTALS | 186 | 2,653 | 14.3 | 80 | 24 |
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Defense
| PLAYER | TOT | SOLO | AST | TFL | SACK | INT | PD | FF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R. SmithILB | 125 | 77 | — | 12.5 | 6.5 | — | 2 | — |
| J. ReedDB | 68 | 36 | — | 4.0 | 1.5 | 2 | 5 | — |
| L. CarterOLB | 58 | 28 | — | 7.5 | 4.5 | — | 0 | — |
| D. BakerDB | 43 | 30 | — | 1 | 0 | 3 | 9 | — |
| D. WalkerOLB | 38 | 25 | — | 12.5 | 4.5 | — | 0 | — |
| T. ClarkDL | 37 | 17 | — | 6.0 | 2.5 | — | 0 | — |
| A. DavisDB | 36 | 24 | — | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1 | 4 | — |
| D. Sanders? | 36 | 21 | — | 3.5 | 0 | 4 | 5 | — |
| J. LedbetterDE | 35 | 16 | — | 5.5 | 2.5 | — | 0 | — |
| J. Atkins? | 34 | 16 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| D. BellamyOLB | 32 | 16 | — | 7.5 | 5.0 | — | 3 | — |
| N. PatrickILB | 32 | 11 | — | 1.5 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| T. ThompsonDT | 32 | 17 | — | 3.5 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| R. CarterILB | 31 | 11 | — | 3 | 0.5 | — | 1 | — |
| T. McGheeDB | 24 | 14 | — | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1 | 6 | — |
| D. MarshallLB | 23 | 12 | — | 2.5 | 1 | — | 1 | — |
| M. ParrishDB | 22 | 20 | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | — |
| M. RiceLB | 22 | 10 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. RochesterDL | 21 | 8 | — | 2.5 | 2 | — | 0 | — |
| R. LeCounteDB | 15 | 10 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. TaylorILB | 13 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| W. GrantLB | 8 | 5 | — | 2.5 | 0.5 | — | 0 | — |
| M. HerringDL | 7 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| N. McBrideLB | 7 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| T. CrowderLB | 7 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| M. CarterDL | 6 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| A. SpeedCB | 5 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| J. Wilson? | 5 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| M. HardmanWR | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| M. BarnettDT | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| C. PayneFB | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| K. RichardsonOLB | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| D. GibbsDB | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. FrommQB | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. StanleyWR | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| C. WoernerTE | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| D. Hawkins-MuckleDT | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| P. HudsonDB | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| T. FrixLS | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| T. SimmonsWR | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| A. BynumOT | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| B. ClevelandOL | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| I. NautaTE | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. WimsWR | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| J. YoungDE | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| M. WebbDB | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| R. RidleyWR | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| S. FogartyOL | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| S. Michel? | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| T. GodwinWR | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| TEAM TOTALS | 869 | 481 | 0 | 85 | 32 | 12 | 43 | 0 |
SEASON PRODUCTION
SWIPE FOR MORE →Kicking & Scoring
| PLAYER | FGM | FGA | FG% | XPM | XPA | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R. BlankenshipPK | 20 | 23 | — | 63 | 63 | 123 |
| D. MarvinPK | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| TEAM TOTALS | 21 | 24 | 87.5 | 64 | 64 | 127 |
TEAM NEWS + STATTAKE ARTICLES
ALL CFB NEWS →Latest Georgia coverage
NATIONAL UPDATE
Georgia: A 42-7 rout in Oxford made the Bulldogs a unanimous choice for the top sp…
A 42-7 rout in Oxford made the Bulldogs a unanimous choice for the top spot after Miami's loss at Notre Dame, while Oregon makes a massive leap into the top 20 With Miami falling at Notre Dame on Saturday night, the door is open for a new team to take over at the No. 1 spot in the college football rankings. The Georgia Bulldogs were previously ranked No. 1 in the CBS Sports 138 on Oct. 12, but immediately took a tumble after an upset loss to Auburn. Then, on Saturday night, the Bulldogs throttled Ole Miss 42-7 in Oxford, putting together arguably one of the best wins that we've seen all season. That was the easiest decision on the ballot, and it's no surprise the Dawgs are a unanimous pick for the top spot in our college football rankings. Further down, things get a little more complex and complicated as our voters feel pretty good about the top five teams (Georgia, Utah, Notre Dame, UCLA and Miami), even if their order is not unanimous. What gets tricky is trying to sort out the next groups, as there is no agreement on the placement of Alabama or Texas, and Big 12 rivals BYU and Texas Tech are separated by a razor-thin margin inside the top 12. Those disagreements represented by o
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEGeorgia football lands commitment from nation's top offensive tackle.
Georgia football lands commitment from nation's top offensive tackle. Georgia football landed its highest ranked prospect for the 2027 class when 5-star OT Mark Matthews announced his commitment Monday.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEGeorgia: BCS formula Top 25 makes changes after Week 10 results, before next CFP r…
The BCS formula Top 25 has dropped after an upset-filled weekend which could shift how the college football landscape looks. The CFP Selection Committee has provided its first looks at the rankings which will determine the playoff bracket. Meanwhile, BCSKnowHow has run the numbers again based on a fan-favorite model from the past which will help set the tone for what the updated Top 25 looks like on Tuesday. While the BCS era is in the rearview mirror and the college football postseason continues to change, the formula can still showcase where teams stand after Week 10 of the 2026 season. Key points from the original article: 1. Georgia (+1) 2. Utah (+1) 3. Notre Dame (+3) 4. UCLA (+1) 5. Miami (-4) 6. Alabama (+3) 7. Indiana (-3) 8. Texas (+2) 9. Tennessee (+7) 10. Texas Tech (+5) 11. Wake Forest (+3) 12. BYU (-4) 13. Kentucky (-6) 14. USC (+3) 15. Houston (+3) 16. Iowa (+4) 17. Ole Miss (-5) 18. Oregon (+7) 19. Boise State (+2) 20. Ohio State (-9) 21. LSU (-8) 22. South Carolina (+2) 23. Arizona 24. New Mexico (NEW) 25. Missouri (-6)
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEGeorgia football lands commitment from five-star OT Mark Matthews.
Former five-star Texas A&M commit flips to Georgia. Former Texas A&M offensive tackle commit Mark Matthews has flipped to the Georgia Bulldogs. He is the No. 2 player in the country.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATE2026 College Football Rankings: Georgia Reclaims No.
2026 College Football Rankings: Georgia Reclaims No. 1 As Notre Dame Beats Miami. Joel Klatt's top 10 looks a lot different after another weekend filled with upsets and tough losses across college football.
READ UPDATE →NATIONAL UPDATEGeorgia football ranked over pair of unbeatens in new AP rankings.
Georgia football ranked over pair of unbeatens in new AP rankings. Georgia football takes the top spot in the AP poll after a dominant win at Ole Miss and a Miami loss shakes up the rankings.
READ UPDATE →STATTAKEDid Georgia’s Offense Really Score 41—or Did Its Defense?
Georgia’s rout of Oklahoma looked like an offensive explosion. The Bulldogs gained 306 yards; their defense supplied the avalanche.
READ UPDATE →STATTAKEGeorgia Isn’t Oklahoma’s Defensive Test. It’s John Mateer’s.
The Sooners have allowed 23 points all season. Their trip to Georgia is less about whether Brent Venables can build a defense than whether Oklahoma’s offense can stop wasting it.
READ UPDATE →ROSTER BUILDING
RECRUITING HUB →Recruiting & development
Recruiting to production
See how efficiently signed talent develops into starts, impact and wins.
What transfers added
Separate returning development from incoming and outgoing portal value.
PROGRAM CONTEXT
TEAM TRENDS →History & trends
Wins, efficiency and schedule strength in one timeline.
Home, road, favorite and underdog performance.
Recent form versus the long-term series story.
Drafted players by position and development path.
Arkansas
LSU