Big-play production share
← ALL METRICSSTATTAKE PROPRIETARY METRIC • V1.0-provisional
Explosive Dependency
How much an offense relies on explosive plays rather than sustainable down-to-down production.
0–100%NATURAL SCALEPENDING
DESIGNED VISUAL METHOD
VERIFIED DATA ONLYTeam DNA Fingerprint
PRIMARY VIEW • TEAM DNA
Separate big-play production from sustainable down-to-down output.
- Explosive share
- Sustained share
- Scoring dependence
FORMAT STACK100% stacked production chart • Explosiveness-sustainability quadrant • Team DNA
Show the number of qualifying drives and plays.PUBLIC METHODOLOGY
PROPRIETARY MODELWhat it considers
Scoring-drive reliance
Performance without explosives
Play-type context
Estimates how much offensive production depends on explosive plays rather than repeatable execution. Exact weighting, calibration and model code remain private.
2026 NATIONAL BOARD
PROVISIONALCurrent leaderboard
| RK | TEAM | EXPLOSIVE DEP. | STATUS | SAMPLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Oregon | 87.2% | PROVISIONAL | 3 |
| 2 |  Delaware | 80.0% | PROVISIONAL | 3 |
| 3 |  Syracuse | 77.5% | PROVISIONAL | 3 |
| 4 |  New Mexico State | 72.7% | PROVISIONAL | 3 |
| 5 |  Memphis | 70.2% | PROVISIONAL | 3 |
| 6 |  Coastal Carolina | 67.1% | PROVISIONAL | 3 |
| 7 |  North Dakota State | 62.9% | PROVISIONAL | 3 |
| 8 |  San José State | 60.8% | PROVISIONAL | 3 |
| 9 |  Wake Forest | 57.4% | PROVISIONAL | 3 |
| 10 |  Hawai'i | 50.3% | PROVISIONAL | 3 |
| 11 |  Pittsburgh | 46.5% | PROVISIONAL | 3 |
| 12 |  UNLV | 42.2% | PROVISIONAL | 3 |
| 13 |  Sacramento State | 37.6% | PROVISIONAL | 3 |
| 14 |  Miami | 34.9% | PROVISIONAL | 3 |
| 15 |  Jacksonville State | 31.8% | PROVISIONAL | 3 |
| 16 |  Eastern Michigan | 31.4% | PROVISIONAL | 3 |
| 17 |  Houston | 26.6% | PROVISIONAL | 3 |
| 18 |  Texas Tech | 22.7% | PROVISIONAL | 3 |
| 19 |  USC | 15.2% | PROVISIONAL | 3 |