Down-to-down consistency
← ALL METRICSSTATTAKE PROPRIETARY METRIC • V1.0-provisional
Efficiency Score
Down-to-down performance with less credit for isolated, high-variance plays.
0–100NATURAL SCALEPENDING
DESIGNED VISUAL METHOD
VERIFIED DATA ONLYTeam-Logo Quadrant
PRIMARY VIEW • QUADRANT
Separate efficient, explosive, methodical and struggling profiles.
- Offensive efficiency
- Defensive efficiency
- National averages
FORMAT STACKOffense-defense quadrant • Team DNA fingerprint • Percentile bars
Use opponent-adjusted ranges when schedule strength is incomplete.PUBLIC METHODOLOGY
PROPRIETARY MODELWhat it considers
Situational execution
Scoring efficiency
Opponent context
Emphasizes sustainable execution and reduces the influence of isolated, high-variance plays. Exact weighting, calibration and model code remain private.
2026 NATIONAL BOARD
PROVISIONALCurrent leaderboard
| RK | TEAM | EFFICIENCY | STATUS | SAMPLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  USC | 71.5 | PROVISIONAL | 173 |
| 2 |  Virginia | 65.4 | PROVISIONAL | 102 |
| 3 |  North Dakota State | 61.2 | PROVISIONAL | 163 |
| 4 |  North Carolina | 58.7 | PROVISIONAL | 96 |
| 5 |  Pittsburgh | 57.6 | PROVISIONAL | 185 |
| 6 |  Memphis | 53.5 | PROVISIONAL | 177 |
| 7 |  TCU | 52.3 | PROVISIONAL | 124 |
| 8 |  NC State | 52.2 | PROVISIONAL | 69 |
| 9 |  Florida State | 48.9 | PROVISIONAL | 134 |
| 10 |  Stanford | 48.1 | PROVISIONAL | 107 |
| 11 |  Jacksonville State | 47.0 | PROVISIONAL | 161 |
| 12 |  Syracuse | 45.2 | PROVISIONAL | 202 |
| 13 |  New Mexico State | 45.0 | PROVISIONAL | 187 |
| 14 |  San José State | 40.2 | PROVISIONAL | 196 |
| 15 |  Eastern Michigan | 37.8 | PROVISIONAL | 189 |
| 16 |  Sacramento State | 37.7 | PROVISIONAL | 135 |
| 17 |  Hawai'i | 31.5 | PROVISIONAL | 230 |
| 18 |  UNLV | 26.8 | PROVISIONAL | 204 |