Situational decisions
← ALL METRICSSTATTAKE PROPRIETARY METRIC • V1.0-provisional
Coaching Edge
Decision quality and situational execution separated from baseline roster strength.
0–100NATURAL SCALEPENDING
DESIGNED VISUAL METHOD
VERIFIED DATA ONLYActual vs. Expected Dumbbell
PRIMARY VIEW • ACTUAL VS EXPECTED
Expose decision value above or below the game-state baseline.
- Decision baseline
- Observed result
- Context adjustment
FORMAT STACKExpected-versus-actual residual plot • Decision matrix • Coach small multiples
Use confidence intervals around residual estimates.PUBLIC METHODOLOGY
PROPRIETARY MODELWhat it considers
Clock and game management
Adjustments
Execution discipline
Separates decision quality and situational execution from a team's baseline roster strength. Exact weighting, calibration and model code remain private.
2026 NATIONAL BOARD
PROVISIONALCurrent leaderboard
| RK | TEAM | COACHING | STATUS | SAMPLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  USC | 62.6 | PROVISIONAL | 3 |
| 2 |  Houston | 62.0 | PROVISIONAL | 3 |
| 3 |  Texas Tech | 61.8 | PROVISIONAL | 3 |
| 4 |  New Mexico State | 58.5 | PROVISIONAL | 3 |
| 5 |  Wake Forest | 58.3 | PROVISIONAL | 3 |
| 6 |  Miami | 58.3 | PROVISIONAL | 3 |
| 7 |  Hawai'i | 58.0 | PROVISIONAL | 3 |
| 8 |  UNLV | 56.4 | PROVISIONAL | 3 |
| 9 |  Coastal Carolina | 55.0 | PROVISIONAL | 3 |
| 10 |  North Dakota State | 53.8 | PROVISIONAL | 3 |
| 11 |  Memphis | 51.6 | PROVISIONAL | 3 |
| 12 |  Oregon | 46.7 | PROVISIONAL | 3 |
| 13 |  Sacramento State | 46.7 | PROVISIONAL | 3 |
| 14 |  Jacksonville State | 45.4 | PROVISIONAL | 3 |
| 15 |  Pittsburgh | 44.8 | PROVISIONAL | 3 |
| 16 |  Delaware | 38.2 | PROVISIONAL | 3 |
| 17 |  Eastern Michigan | 37.0 | PROVISIONAL | 3 |
| 18 |  Syracuse | 35.0 | PROVISIONAL | 3 |
| 19 |  San José State | 31.9 | PROVISIONAL | 3 |